Commit 56e6bda
docs: mark the EEPROM claim as inference, not specification (#392)
The WIT guide asserted 'All other writable VPP registers ARE written to EEPROM'
as though Growatt had said so. They have not. The only statement in any document
we hold is the 'Not storage' annotation on 30101, 30154 and 30407-30409; the
claim about everything else is our reasoning from that annotation's existence.
A reporter building a price-driven TOU controller read our docs carefully, could
not find the spec behind the claim, and asked whether one existed. It does not,
and the wording should not have implied it did.
The advice is unchanged - write infrequently to anything not marked 'Not storage'
- but it is now labelled as caution rather than a documented limit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent fe21b51 commit 56e6bda
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 1 deletion
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
79 | 79 | | |
80 | 80 | | |
81 | 81 | | |
82 | | - | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
83 | 91 | | |
84 | 92 | | |
85 | 93 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments