Add an attribute to mix traditional and combinatorial data #93
Open
Description
Essentially, I'm looking to be able to hand write values for some test parameters while combinatorially populating others. This would allow more control over e.g. int
values than the existing range options or the veto option proposed in #3.
An (albeit useless) toy example:
/// Assumption: a > b
[Theory]
[InlineData(10, 0, true)]
[InlineData(10, 0, false)]
[InlineData(5, 2, true)]
[InlineData(5, 2, false)]
public void Example(int a, int b, bool c)
{
// body
}
In this example, the values for a
and b
are hand-picked, but should be tested for both values of c
. I assume it may not be possible to build this functionality on top of the existing InlineData
attribute, but supposing a new keyword-style equivalent that replaced any omitted parameters with their combinatorial definitions, it could look like this:
/// Assumption: a > b
[Theory, CombinatorialData]
[PartialInlineData(10, 0)]
[PartialInlineData(10, 0)]
[PartialInlineData(5, 2)]
[PartialInlineData(5, 2)]
public void Example(int a, int b, [CombinatorialValues(true, false)] bool c)
{
// body
}
and could also support cases where we don't want the combinatorics a la #3
[PartialInlineData(6, 2, false)]
// No need to veto [PartialInlineData(6, 2, true)] if you don't want it
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels