Discussion with @Simo-climb .
We have adopted a convention that each Vocabulary is titled Type, and classed as skos:Concept.
In most cases, each Vocab is 'owned' by a similarly-named class. We could just the 'owner' as skos:Concept in addition to their other type or subclass properties. This would require bulk rename of the Vocabs in https://github.com/surroundaustralia/dawe-vocabs/tree/master/vocabularies.
But it would neaten things up (and make profiling easier I think?).
For a future revision.
Discussion with @Simo-climb .
We have adopted a convention that each Vocabulary is titled Type, and classed as
skos:Concept.In most cases, each Vocab is 'owned' by a similarly-named class. We could just the 'owner' as
skos:Conceptin addition to their other type or subclass properties. This would require bulk rename of the Vocabs in https://github.com/surroundaustralia/dawe-vocabs/tree/master/vocabularies.But it would neaten things up (and make profiling easier I think?).
For a future revision.