@@ -907,29 +907,192 @@ The local strength of ground shaking as determined by damage to structures and
907907
908908---
909909
910- ### Self-Similar Earthquake Scaling
910+ ## The Earthquake Cycle
911+
912+ - Elastic rebound
913+
914+ ![ w:1000px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250407142312.png )
915+
916+ ---
917+
918+ ### Spring-block model ([ notebook] ( codes/spring_slider/ ) )
919+
920+ <!--  -->
921+ ![ 20250407155433 h:200px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250407155433.png )
922+
923+ ![ spring slider h:300px] ( ./assets/Screenshot%202023-08-23%20at%2022.53.46.png )
924+
925+ ---
926+
927+ ### Spring-block model
928+
929+ <video src =" ./assets/GIF_1-BlockEQMachine_Graph.mp4 " controls width =" 80% " ></video >
930+
931+ ---
932+
933+ ## Earthquake recurrence model
934+
935+ ![ h:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250407155751.png )
936+
937+ ---
938+
939+ ## Stress drop
940+
941+ Moment $M_0 = \mu A D$
942+
943+ Stress drop $\Delta \sigma = \sigma_ \text{final} - \sigma_ \text{initial}$
944+
945+ ![ 20250409232116 width:1100px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409232116.png )
946+
947+ ---
948+
949+ ## Circular crack model
950+
951+ ![ 20250409232316 width:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409232316.png )
952+
953+ Moment
954+
955+ $$ M_0 = \mu A D = \mu \pi r^2 D $$
956+
957+ Stress drop
958+
959+ $$ \Delta \sigma = \frac{7 \pi \mu D}{16 r} = \frac{7 M_0}{16 r^3} $$
960+
961+ ---
962+
963+ ## Far-field seismic pulse
964+
965+ Area under displacement pulse $f(h\tau)$ is related to seismic moment $M_0$
966+
967+ Radiation patterns, e.g.:
968+ $$ \mathbf{u}^P(t)=\frac{1}{4 \pi \rho \alpha^3} \sin 2 \theta \cos \phi \frac{1}{r} \dot{M}_0\left(t-\frac{r}{\alpha}\right) \hat{\mathbf{r}} $$
969+
970+ ![ bg right:30% fit] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409232744.png )
971+
972+ ---
973+
974+ ## Far-field seismic pulse shape
975+
976+ ![ 20250409232944 height:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409233012.png )
977+
978+ ---
979+
980+
981+ ## Self-Similar Earthquake Scaling
982+
983+ <div style =" display : flex ; justify-content : space-between ;" >
984+ <img src =" https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409234621.png " width =" 48% " >
985+ <img src =" https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409234815.png " width =" 48% " >
986+ </div >
987+
988+ Assuming dimensions are scaled proportionally, displacement D will increase by b
989+
990+ ---
991+
992+ ## Self-Similar Earthquake Scaling
993+
994+ ![ 20250409234921 height:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409234921.png )
995+
996+
997+ ---
998+
999+ ## Self-Similar Earthquake Scaling
9111000
9121001![ 20250403002414 height:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250403002414.png )
9131002
1003+ ---
1004+
1005+ ## Self-similar Earthquake Scaling
1006+
1007+ Are different sized events self-similar?
1008+
1009+ * Self-similarity predicts smaller events are “shifted” versions of larger events.
1010+
1011+ * Following $\omega^{-3}$ for self-similarity
1012+
1013+
1014+ ![ bg right:50% fit] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409235704.png )
1015+
1016+
1017+ ---
1018+
1019+ ## Self-similar Earthquake Scaling
1020+
1021+ - Stacking spectra following $\omega^{-3}$, spectral shapes are similar within uncertainties.
1022+
1023+ * Self-similarity implies that apparent stress is size independent
1024+
1025+ ![ bg right:50% fit] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409235858.png )
1026+
1027+
1028+ ---
1029+
1030+ ## Bruce model (1970)
1031+
1032+ $$ u(f) = \frac{M_0}{1 + (f/f_c)^2} $$
1033+
1034+ From model fit obtained:
1035+
1036+ - Corner frequency ($f_c$)
1037+ - Radiated energy ($E_s$)
1038+
1039+ ![ bg right:50% fit] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410000033.png )
1040+
1041+ ---
1042+
1043+ ## Corner frequency
1044+
1045+ ![ 20250410000325 height:550px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410000325.png )
1046+
1047+ ---
1048+
1049+ ## Far-field seismic pulse shape
1050+
1051+
1052+ ![ 20250409232623 width:1000px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409232623.png )
1053+
1054+
1055+
9141056---
9151057
9161058### Earthquake Energy Partitioning
9171059
1060+ ![ 20250409234107 height:550px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250409234107.png )
1061+
1062+ ---
1063+
1064+ ### Earthquake Energy Partitioning
1065+
1066+
9181067![ 20250403002307 height:500px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250403002307.png )
9191068
9201069---
9211070
922- ### Earthquake rupture ( [ notebook ] ( codes/spring_slider/ ) )
1071+ ### Earthquake Scaling: static and dynamic
9231072
924- <!--  -->
925- ![ spring slider] ( ./assets/Screenshot%202023-08-23%20at%2022.53.46.png )
1073+ ![ 20250410000604 height:550px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410000604.png )
9261074
9271075---
9281076
929- <video src =" ./assets/GIF_1-BlockEQMachine_Graph.mp4 " controls width =" 80% " ></video >
1077+ ### Stess and Radiated Energy
1078+
1079+ Is the stress drop close to the absolute stress level (weak faults) or just a small portion (strong faults)?
1080+
1081+ ![ bg right:60% fit] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410000726.png )
9301082
9311083---
9321084
1085+ ### Apparent Stress (Abercrombie, 1995)
1086+
1087+ ![ 20250410001145 height:550px] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410001145.png )
1088+
1089+ ---
1090+
1091+ ### Apparent Stress (Ide and Beroza, 2001)
1092+
1093+ ![ 20250410000915] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuwq0/images/main/20250410000915.png )
1094+
1095+ ---
9331096
9341097### Seismic wave propagation ([ notebook] ( codes/wave_propagation/ ) )
9351098
0 commit comments