You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An approximate empirical formula has been derived for $\log_{10} A_0(X)$ at different ranges.
687
+
The local magnitude can be calculated by
688
+
$$
689
+
M_L = \log_{10} A(X) + 2.56 \log_{10} X - 1.67
690
+
$$
691
+
where $A(X)$ is the displacement amplitude in microns (10$^{-6}$ m) and X is in kilometers.
692
+
693
+
* Events below about $M_L 3$ are generally not felt
694
+
* Significant damage to structures in California begins to occur at about $M_L 5.5$
695
+
* A $M_L 6.0$ earthquake implies amplitude 100 times greater than a $M_L 4.0$ event.
671
696
672
697
---
673
698
699
+
### Global earthquakes: body wave magnitude $m_b$
700
+
701
+
702
+
$$
703
+
m_b = \log_{10} (A/T) + Q(h, \Delta)
704
+
$$
705
+
706
+
where A is the ground displacement in microns, T is the dominant period of the measured waves, $\Delta$ is the epicentral distance in degrees, and Q is an empirical function of range and event depth h.
674
707
708
+
* Why $A/T$?
709
+
* h?
675
710
676
711
---
677
712
713
+
### Global earthquakes: surface wave magnitude $M_s$
The saturation of the and scales for large events helped motivate development of the moment magnitude $M_w$
807
+
808
+
$$
809
+
M_w = \frac{2}{3} (\log_{10} M_0 - 9.1)
810
+
$$
811
+
where is the moment measured in N-m.
812
+
813
+
* The advantage of the scale is that it is clearly related to a physical property of the source and it does not saturate for even the largest earthquakes.
814
+
* One unit increase in $M_w$ corresponds to a $10^{3/2} \approx 32$ times increase in the moment.
815
+
* A $M_w 7$ earthquake releases about 1000 times more energy than a $M_w 5$ event.
0 commit comments