Hello,
you have done a nice job here and very well documented.
However I still have a question concerning the documentation of the pre-trained models.
Within the readme.md (downloaded with the pre-trained weights), the training data are listed as 89 images of 9 ha each, randomly sampled within Germany with a resolution of 20 cm.
In the paper (Individual tree crown delineation in high-resolution remote sensing images based on U-Net) two other datasets are listed. The Bengaluru satellite images (35 tiles of 9 ha each with 30 cm resolution) and Germany aerial images (39 tiles of 2500 m² each with 5 cm resolution).
So my questions is, are the data used for the pre-trained models actually different to the one documented in the paper?
Hello,
you have done a nice job here and very well documented.
However I still have a question concerning the documentation of the pre-trained models.
Within the readme.md (downloaded with the pre-trained weights), the training data are listed as 89 images of 9 ha each, randomly sampled within Germany with a resolution of 20 cm.
In the paper (Individual tree crown delineation in high-resolution remote sensing images based on U-Net) two other datasets are listed. The Bengaluru satellite images (35 tiles of 9 ha each with 30 cm resolution) and Germany aerial images (39 tiles of 2500 m² each with 5 cm resolution).
So my questions is, are the data used for the pre-trained models actually different to the one documented in the paper?