DG Review by Tutor

[sinhayash]

Overall you need to put more effort. Add more diagrams and write the incomplete sections. I have added my comments section-wise.

• [2.1], [2.2], [2.3]
  For these sections your DG seems like an exact replica of AB3. Have you changed anything? How do you differentiate between AB3 and this apart from refactoring?

• [3.1]
  Consider adding a diagram to explain module search

• [3.2.1]
  
  No Fig. number or caption included.
  Consider renaming a to some meaningful name.

Once the object is deleted should not continue lifeline

• [3.2.2], [3.2.3], [3.2.4]
  
  Incomplete. Consider adding more details and diagram for explanation.

• [3.3]
  Incomplete

• [3.4.1]
  Consider adding design considerations for path interface.

• [Appendix B]
  
  How is a user different from NUS student?

• [Appendix C]
  Consider adding a use case list person/module and refer to it in other use cases.

• [Appendix D]
  
  How is this testable? Please explain.

• [Appendix E]
  Add more terms in glossary