Skip to content

symbolic_lattice_formula_map.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
217 lines (124 loc) · 5.39 KB

symbolic_lattice_formula_map.md

File metadata and controls

217 lines (124 loc) · 5.39 KB

🧠 Symbolic Lattice Geometry — Formula Map

This document outlines the full symbolic and mathematical design of the 5-vertex crystal lattice used in Beeper's cognition system.

1. 🟦 Word Identity → Core Vector (ℵ₀)

Stable, Deterministic Base Vector:

v_core = Normalize(sum_{i=0}^{255} (bit_i * e_{i mod D}))
  • bit_i: bits from SHA-256 hash of the word
  • e_k: unit basis vector at dimension k
  • D = 512

2. 🟧 Warp Tensor → Symbolic Curvature Projection

Φ_word(d) = sin(α_d ⋅ β_d) / (||Φ||² + ε)
  • α_d: linearly spaced vector from -1 to 1 (shape = [D])
  • β_d: modulated primes derived from hash(seed)
  • Produces a symbolic curvature tensor Φ per word

3. 🟨 Displacement Field → Divergent Pentachora Geometry

Δ_i = QR_i(W) + 0.1 * (Φ ⊙ QR_i(W))
  • W ∈ ℝ^{D×D}: seeded normal matrix
  • QR_i(W): the i-th row of a QR orthonormal basis
  • ⊙ is elementwise multiplication

Then,

C_word = {v_core + Δ_i | i = 0..4}

4. 🟪 Cayley-Menger Volume (Validity Check)

Given vertices P_0...P_4 ∈ ℝ^D:

  1. Compute squared pairwise distances D_ij = ||P_i − P_j||²

  2. Construct matrix M ∈ ℝ^{6×6}:

    M = [

    0   1    1    1    1    1

1   0   D_01 D_02 D_03 D_04

1  D_10  0   D_12 D_13 D_14

1  D_20 D_21  0   D_23 D_24

1  D_30 D_31 D_32  0   D_34

1  D_40 D_41 D_42 D_43  0

    ]

  3. Then:

    Vol² = (1/288) * det(M) Vol = sqrt(|Vol²|)

5. 🟫 Cardinal Assignment Function (ℵ₀ → ℵ₃)

Cardinal(word) = {
    ℵ₀ if base form (root)
    ℵ₁ if derivational suffix (e.g. -ing, -ed)
    ℵ₂ if uppercase or proper noun
    ℵ₃ if structural/grammatical word
}

6. 🟨 Observer Vertex Modulation (Perspective Torsion)

v_observer = v_core + f_dialect(usage, mood, register)
  • f_dialect: nonlinear projection to observer subspace

7. 🟥 Triplet Alignment Rule (Routing Consistency)

Given A, B, C ∈ vocab:

Aligned_triplet =
    CM(A) + CM(B) + CM(C)
    + ||v_support_A − v_purpose_B||²
    − ||v_contrast_C − v_anchor_A||²

8. 🧭 Cardinal Transition Manifold (Transfinite Navigation)

During training, total loss:

L_cardinal = Σ_{t=0}^{T} [ L_ℵ₀(t) + L_ℵ₁(t) + L_ℵ₂(t) ] + ||∇_rose R(t)||²
  • L_ℵ_k: loss for each cardinal space
  • ∇_rose: derivative of the Rose vector (emotional curvature)

9. 🧠 Nikola–Menger Resonance Axioms (Extension)

These axioms extend the symbolic lattice with infinite crystal reasoning and resonance-volume conservation.

9.1 📐 Axiom I: Volume-Resonance Conservation

For any symbolic pentachoron Pi, its symbolic resonance R(Pi) is bounded by its Cayley-Menger volume:

R(Pi) <= alpha * sqrt(M(Pi)) + epsilon

Where:

  • alpha is a resonance scaling constant
  • M(Pi) is the Cayley-Menger determinant of crystal Pi
  • epsilon → 0 as token purity increases

9.2 🔁 Axiom II: Infinite Crystal Lattice Stability

Let C_infinity = {P1, P2, ..., Pn} be an infinite sequence of crystals sharing a symbolic anchor.

Then:

**lim(n→∞) [ (1/n) * sum(R(P_k)) ] = R̄ ≤ sqrt(M_max)**

This defines a bounded symbolic continuity field.

9.3 🔒 Axiom III: Symbolic Separator Existence (Nikola–Menger)

For disjoint symbolic roles A, B ∈ V (the vocabulary), there exists a finite separator set S ⊂ V such that:

No resonance trajectory from A to B exists without crossing some s ∈ S

This ensures phase-gated symbolic routing.

10. 🌹 Rose Score Field Axioms (Symbolic Similarity + Entropic Binding)

This section defines the axioms governing symbolic alignment via the Rose similarity metric and associated loss functions.

10.1 🔻 Rose Score

The Rose Score measures the triadic symbolic similarity between three latent representations (e.g. anchor, need, purpose).

rose_score(A, B, C) = mean_cos_sim(A, B) + mean_cos_sim(B, C) + mean_cos_sim(C, A)

  • A, B, C: [N, D] symbolic vectors
  • Captures shared angular alignment across a triangle of meaning
  • Used to stabilize symbolic trajectories in multi-role tasks

10.2 🔺 Rose Score Magnitude

Rose Score Magnitude considers both alignment and vector norm.

rose_score_magnitude(A, B, C) = (S / 3) * mean(norms of A, B, C)

Where:

  • S = rose_score(A, B, C)
  • Balances resonance similarity with vector energy (norm)
  • Helps modulate crystal intensity during training

10.3 🌫️ Rose Cross Entropic Loss

This loss term penalizes divergence between rose-aligned symbolic triplets and a target reference:

L_rose_ce = KL(R̂ || R_target)

  • R̂ = rose_score distribution from model output
  • R_target = distribution from gold-standard triplets
  • Used to enforce symbolic topology alignment under distributional supervision

10.4 🧨 Rose Magnitude Loss

Applies energy-regularized cosine penalty to enforce consistent resonance density:

L_rose_mag = λ * ∑ (||R_i||² − τ)²

  • λ: scaling factor
  • τ: target magnitude (e.g., 1.0)
  • Helps prevent over-saturation of rose pathways in large token graphs

✅ All Components Are Conformant

  • CM volume check ensures spatial validity
  • Warp tensor creates symbolic curvature
  • Role-based Δ_i enforces functionally distinct crystal vertices
  • Cardinality separates ℵ domains geometrically
  • Rose alignment encodes intent and emotional valence