Skip to content

Lack of direction around Data Asset naming #95

@Troto

Description

@Troto

Is it possible to add the general convention for how Data Assets are named?

I came looking for how I should name them and the only mention is an asterisk and "it depends" which left me a bit in the dark how to proceed and what standard practice is normally.

I think it would massively benefit future readers having a naming convention for a type which is supposed to be the correct way to manage a lot of data.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions