Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
@evripidis, I believe the meteor detection module does that, and our to-do list includes adding a mask for auto-exposure. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If we wanted a more accurate reading of the brightness of the exposed part of an image, i.e., not the black borders that are on many allsky images, a mask could temporarily be applied while calculating the brightness. That mask would not show up in the final image. The RPi capture program does this to determine what auto-exposure to use - it uses a circular mask that's 1/3 the width of the image. The ZWO capture program is similar. One of our to-do items is to allow users to specify the mask to use. We could probably also modify the Having said that, I'm not sure a more accurate average brightness is needed, other than to be able to compare it to the Right now, the What are your thoughts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is it somehow possible to use a mask (like the documentation says) but not be visible on the website?
The mask should be applied to be able to run all the calculations for the modules, but the user will have to decide with an ON/OFF option, to stay hidden from the end user.
If we have a perfect circle for mask is ok. But if we have a mask which we are trying to cover up trees etc. it is not so appealing.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions