forked from rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathquiz.json
More file actions
78 lines (78 loc) · 3.05 KB
/
Copy pathquiz.json
File metadata and controls
78 lines (78 loc) · 3.05 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
{
"lesson": "26-model-system-dataset-cards",
"title": "Model, System, and Dataset Cards",
"questions": [
{
"stage": "pre",
"question": "Which best describes the original Mitchell et al. (2019) Model Card?",
"options": [
"An OpenAPI specification",
"A 'nutrition label' for ML models: training data, intended use, factors, metrics, evaluation data, quantitative disaggregated analyses, ethical considerations, caveats",
"A model checkpoint manifest only",
"A regulatory legal contract"
],
"correct": 1,
"explanation": ""
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "What did Oreamuno et al. (2023) find about ethical-considerations adoption in Hugging Face model cards?",
"options": [
"Approximately 0.3% document ethical considerations",
"Approximately 80% document ethical considerations",
"No model card has any text at all",
"All model cards document them"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": ""
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "What does Pushkarna et al. (Google 2022) Data Cards' telescopic / periscopic / microscopic layering provide?",
"options": [
"A boundary-object framing where the same document serves different readers (non-experts, ML practitioners, auditors) via three zoom levels of detail",
"A pre-RLHF audit checklist",
"A telescope-themed visualization library",
"A privacy-preserving query interface"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": ""
},
{
"stage": "check",
"question": "What scope does a System Card cover that Model Cards do not?",
"options": [
"End-to-end AI system: model + safety stack + deployment context, including security capabilities, prompt-injection protection, data-exfiltration detection, alignment, and incident response",
"Only the dataset",
"Only the prompt template",
"Only the tokenizer"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": ""
},
{
"stage": "post",
"question": "What did Liang et al. (2024) report about model-card detail and Hugging Face download rate?",
"options": [
"Detailed model cards drive a +29.0% weekly download lift on HF for the treatment group vs control (diff-in-diff); adoption pressure is now market-driven, not only compliance-driven",
"Only ethical-considerations sections affected downloads",
"Detail had no effect on downloads",
"Detail decreased download rates"
],
"correct": 0,
"explanation": ""
},
{
"stage": "post",
"question": "What does Laminator (Duddu et al. 2024) contribute to documentation?",
"options": [
"An automated benchmarking harness",
"Verifiable attestations via hardware TEE / cryptographic signatures, so the card can carry a proof-of-claim instead of just a claim",
"A replacement for the Datasheets standard",
"An LLM-based summary generator"
],
"correct": 1,
"explanation": ""
}
]
}