|
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | # MedSci Skills |
4 | 4 |
|
5 | | -**47 skills that actually work.** Built by a physician-researcher, tested on real publications. |
| 5 | +**48 skills that actually work.** Built by a physician-researcher, tested on real publications. |
6 | 6 |
|
7 | 7 | *MedSci Skills is a submission-grade clinical manuscript workflow, not a generic biomedical skill catalog. Its moat is the compliance layer — 38 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools, reference/citation verification, and deterministic integrity gates, before peer review sees the manuscript. It competes on clinical submission reliability, not skill count.* |
8 | 8 |
|
9 | 9 | [](LICENSE) |
10 | 10 | [](https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/releases/latest) |
11 | 11 | [](https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/actions/workflows/validate.yml) |
12 | | - |
| 12 | + |
13 | 13 | [](https://www.npmjs.com/package/medsci-skills) |
14 | 14 | [](https://youtu.be/MclQ_RIofpE) |
15 | 15 | [](https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/contribute) |
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ ma-scout -> search-lit -> fulltext-retrieval -> design-study ──> write-proto |
453 | 453 | | **design-ai-benchmarking** | Design and validity review for benchmarking AI system(s) against a human-expert panel: evaluation-question and arm definition, decoupled multi-dimensional rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes (positive-control / known-bad / instability / mechanism-contradiction), reviewer-panel construction with per-reviewer randomization, inter-rater reliability targets with separate control-item reliability, LLM-as-judge vs human-as-judge adjudication, construct-independence guards, and a structured JSON rating-export schema. Locks the rubric before data collection. | |
454 | 454 | | **model-validation** | Design or audit the clinical-validation study for an engineer-built medical-imaging model (segmentation / classification / detection): patient-level split disjointness and the data-leakage taxonomy, tuning-on-test, internal vs genuine external validation, comparator design, single-run vs multi-seed variance, task-correct metric selection (Metrics Reloaded), test-set sizing, and CLAIM 2024 / TRIPOD+AI / STARD-AI reporting fit. Ships a deterministic split-leakage gate that proves patient disjointness by set arithmetic on the emitted split table. Integrates with MONAI / nnU-Net — does not replace them. | |
455 | 455 | | **model-scaffold** | Generate a reproducible, runnable PyTorch training repo for a medical-imaging segmentation task — the missing middle link between choosing an architecture and validating a trained model. Emits a patient-level seed-locked split as an auditable artifact, a configurable U-Net, train/evaluate scripts that seed every RNG and infer under eval mode, a config, requirements, a reproducibility record, and a Methods stub with VERIFY placeholders (no fabricated numbers). Reproducibility holds by construction; ships a `check_training_hygiene` AST gate + a network-free build→validate challenge. Integrates with MONAI / nnU-Net / TorchIO — does not reimplement them. | |
| 456 | +| **architecture-zoo** | "Which architecture for which research question" decision tool: maps task (classification / segmentation / detection / transfer), modality, data scale, and class imbalance to a paper-grounded architecture shortlist. Curates the foundational curriculum (ResNet / DenseNet / EfficientNet / ViT / Swin; U-Net / 3-D U-Net / Attention & Residual U-Net / nnU-Net / Mask R-CNN; SAM/MedSAM / TotalSegmentator / BiomedCLIP / DINO / MAE / SimCLR) — each with core idea, when-to-use, medical-imaging use, reference implementation, validation setup, and the matching model-scaffold template. Advisory; teaches archetypes, not a live SOTA leaderboard. | |
456 | 457 | | **intake-project** | Classifies new research projects, summarizes current state, identifies missing inputs, and recommends next steps. | |
457 | 458 | | **grant-builder** | Structures grant proposals: significance, innovation, approach, milestones, and consortium roles. | |
458 | 459 | | **present-paper** | Academic presentation preparation: paper analysis, supporting research, speaker scripts, slide note injection, and Q&A prep. | |
|
0 commit comments