Consider adjusting wording on Add Additional Payments Methods page

[dmallory42]

Description

We have a task which is shown to the user when they enable UPE (note, this would be rarely seen because UPE is on by default, and the method of disabling it is fairly well hidden/hard to find).

I wonder if we can make the wording more clear here. I am not sure if Enablement complete is very easily understood - I wonder if something like Additional payment method setup complete or Setup complete is clearer? This could be just me, so I decided to open an issue for consideration.

cc. @elizaan36 for thoughts 🙂

Other changes to make to this page:

• Remove the see Terms and Conditions text on the credit/debit card pill - it was introduced in this PR and the solution could be to update client/utils/account-fees.tsx to conditionally only add this text if a param is passed in (so we can control where it shows and where it doesn't)
• Remove the required label, and instead use a disabled checkbox with a tooltip saying required: Consider adjusting wording on Add Additional Payments Methods page #7040 (comment).

[elizaan36]

or Setup complete is clearer

+1. "Setup complete" is what I would use here. Much more clear.

There's one thing that's new that needs to be tweaked a bit. Could you share where this "see Terms and Conditions" was added to the fees pill so I can see the context? There's also a strange "Required" text. The placement of these texts needs to be thought through a bit better.

[dmallory42]

Hi @elizaan36!

That Terms and conditions text looks like an unintended change introduced by this PR - I can create a new issue to handle removing it from this fees pill if you think it should not be there?

I'm not sure where that Required text comes from, but I agree it could be improved.

[elizaan36]

Yes the "see Terms and Conditions" link and the "required" text can be removed. I think the checkbox could be read only with a tooltip that says "Required".

[elizaan36]

I shared an example of a disabled checkbox in this comment paJDYF-9Mc#comment-20578. We don't really have this state built into the component though.

[dmallory42]

Thanks @elizaan36! I updated this issue with those changes as well. 🙂

[zmaglica]

This issue impacts Additional Payment methods, so assigning to team Fusion (based on team responsibilities Pc2DNy-3z-p2) @anu-rock .
Assigning as part of Gamma Triage process PcreKM-yM-p2.

[elizaan36]

This issue has to do with the presentation of fees for users who have the incentive applied. cc @rogermattic for awareness. As we update the fees display will be good to keep in mind what information merchants need to see regarding the incentive.

@dmallory42 In an earlier comment we discussed removing the "Terms and conditions" link, but now I'm wondering is it legally required? cc @vladolaru

[vladolaru]

@elizaan36 As I answered here (pbUcTB-447-p2#comment-9272), the Terms and conditions link is not required on this page as long as we have it the Payment > Overview > Account details section.