-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Expand file tree
/
Copy path10_qc_scenarios.py
More file actions
246 lines (195 loc) · 7.78 KB
/
10_qc_scenarios.py
File metadata and controls
246 lines (195 loc) · 7.78 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
RAPTOR QC Stress Test - 4 Scenarios
Tests all QC components with realistic RNA-seq problems.
Author: Ayeh Bolouki
"""
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import json
import os
import sys
# Setup
sys.path.insert(0, '.')
from raptor.quality_assessment import DataQualityAssessor
def create_output(name):
path = f'test_run/scenario_{name}'
os.makedirs(path, exist_ok=True)
return path
# =============================================================================
# SCENARIO 1: High-Quality Data (Gold Standard)
# 8 samples, clear condition effect, no batch effect, no outliers
# Expected: Score > 85, all components green
# =============================================================================
print("=" * 70)
print("SCENARIO 1: High-Quality RNA-seq Data")
print("=" * 70)
np.random.seed(42)
n_genes = 2000
n_per_group = 4
# Base expression with realistic distribution
base_expr = np.random.gamma(shape=2, scale=200, size=n_genes)
# Create counts with clear DE signal (200 DE genes, 2x fold change)
counts1 = {}
for i in range(n_per_group):
counts1[f'Control_{i+1}'] = np.random.negative_binomial(
10, 10 / (10 + base_expr)
).astype(int)
de_genes = np.zeros(n_genes)
de_genes[:200] = 1 # First 200 genes are DE
for i in range(n_per_group):
modified_expr = base_expr.copy()
modified_expr[:200] *= 2.0 # 2x fold change for DE genes
counts1[f'Treatment_{i+1}'] = np.random.negative_binomial(
10, 10 / (10 + modified_expr)
).astype(int)
df1 = pd.DataFrame(counts1, index=[f'Gene_{i+1}' for i in range(n_genes)])
# Metadata with condition only (no batch confounding)
meta1 = pd.DataFrame({
'sample_id': df1.columns,
'condition': ['Control']*4 + ['Treatment']*4,
'batch': ['B1','B1','B2','B2','B1','B1','B2','B2']
})
out1 = create_output('1_high_quality')
df1.to_csv(f'{out1}/counts.csv')
meta1.to_csv(f'{out1}/metadata.csv', index=False)
assessor1 = DataQualityAssessor(df1, meta1)
result1 = assessor1.assess_quality()
print(f" Overall Score: {result1['overall']['score']:.1f}/100")
print(f" Status: {result1['overall']['status']}")
for name, comp in result1['components'].items():
print(f" {name:25s}: {comp['score']:.1f} [{comp['status']}]")
if comp.get('flags'):
for f in comp['flags']:
print(f" -> {f}")
with open(f'{out1}/qc_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(result1, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f" Saved to: {out1}/")
# =============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Outlier Sample + Varying Library Sizes
# 1 sample has 10x lower counts, library sizes vary 5x
# Expected: Outlier detected, library quality warning
# =============================================================================
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("SCENARIO 2: Outlier Sample + Varying Library Sizes")
print("=" * 70)
np.random.seed(123)
df2 = df1.copy()
# Make Sample Treatment_4 a clear outlier (10x lower expression)
df2['Treatment_4'] = (df2['Treatment_4'] * 0.1).astype(int)
# Make library sizes vary dramatically
df2['Control_1'] = (df2['Control_1'] * 3.0).astype(int) # 3x bigger
df2['Control_2'] = (df2['Control_2'] * 0.3).astype(int) # 3x smaller
meta2 = meta1.copy()
out2 = create_output('2_outlier_libsize')
df2.to_csv(f'{out2}/counts.csv')
meta2.to_csv(f'{out2}/metadata.csv', index=False)
assessor2 = DataQualityAssessor(df2, meta2)
result2 = assessor2.assess_quality()
print(f" Overall Score: {result2['overall']['score']:.1f}/100")
print(f" Status: {result2['overall']['status']}")
for name, comp in result2['components'].items():
print(f" {name:25s}: {comp['score']:.1f} [{comp['status']}]")
if comp.get('flags'):
for f in comp['flags']:
print(f" -> {f}")
with open(f'{out2}/qc_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(result2, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f" Saved to: {out2}/")
# =============================================================================
# SCENARIO 3: Strong Batch Effect (Confounded with Condition)
# Batch1 = all Controls, Batch2 = all Treatments
# Expected: Batch effect detected, confounding warning
# =============================================================================
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("SCENARIO 3: Confounded Batch Effect")
print("=" * 70)
np.random.seed(456)
df3 = df1.copy()
# Add strong batch effect: Batch2 samples get 1.5x expression globally
batch2_samples = ['Control_3', 'Control_4', 'Treatment_3', 'Treatment_4']
for s in batch2_samples:
df3[s] = (df3[s] * 1.5).astype(int)
# Confounded metadata: batch perfectly correlates with condition
meta3 = pd.DataFrame({
'sample_id': df3.columns,
'condition': ['Control']*4 + ['Treatment']*4,
'batch': ['Batch1']*4 + ['Batch2']*4 # Perfectly confounded!
})
out3 = create_output('3_batch_confounded')
df3.to_csv(f'{out3}/counts.csv')
meta3.to_csv(f'{out3}/metadata.csv', index=False)
assessor3 = DataQualityAssessor(df3, meta3)
result3 = assessor3.assess_quality()
print(f" Overall Score: {result3['overall']['score']:.1f}/100")
print(f" Status: {result3['overall']['status']}")
for name, comp in result3['components'].items():
print(f" {name:25s}: {comp['score']:.1f} [{comp['status']}]")
if comp.get('flags'):
for f in comp['flags']:
print(f" -> {f}")
with open(f'{out3}/qc_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(result3, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f" Saved to: {out3}/")
# =============================================================================
# SCENARIO 4: Sparse Data (High Zero Inflation)
# 70% zeros, low gene detection, few samples
# Expected: Low gene detection score, warnings about sparsity
# =============================================================================
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("SCENARIO 4: Sparse / Low-Quality Data")
print("=" * 70)
np.random.seed(789)
n_genes4 = 3000
n_samples4 = 4
# Low expression with high zeros
base4 = np.random.gamma(shape=0.5, scale=20, size=n_genes4)
counts4 = {}
for i in range(n_samples4):
c = np.random.negative_binomial(5, 5 / (5 + base4))
# Add 70% zeros
mask = np.random.random(n_genes4) < 0.70
c[mask] = 0
counts4[f'Sample_{i+1}'] = c.astype(int)
df4 = pd.DataFrame(counts4, index=[f'Gene_{i+1}' for i in range(n_genes4)])
meta4 = pd.DataFrame({
'sample_id': df4.columns,
'condition': ['A', 'A', 'B', 'B'],
'batch': ['B1'] * 4
})
out4 = create_output('4_sparse_data')
df4.to_csv(f'{out4}/counts.csv')
meta4.to_csv(f'{out4}/metadata.csv', index=False)
assessor4 = DataQualityAssessor(df4, meta4)
result4 = assessor4.assess_quality()
print(f" Overall Score: {result4['overall']['score']:.1f}/100")
print(f" Status: {result4['overall']['status']}")
for name, comp in result4['components'].items():
print(f" {name:25s}: {comp['score']:.1f} [{comp['status']}]")
if comp.get('flags'):
for f in comp['flags']:
print(f" -> {f}")
with open(f'{out4}/qc_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(result4, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f" Saved to: {out4}/")
# =============================================================================
# SUMMARY TABLE
# =============================================================================
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("SUMMARY: All 4 Scenarios")
print("=" * 70)
print(f"{'Scenario':<40} {'Score':>6} {'Status':<10}")
print("-" * 60)
scenarios = [
("1. High-Quality (Gold Standard)", result1),
("2. Outlier + Library Size Issues", result2),
("3. Confounded Batch Effect", result3),
("4. Sparse / Low-Quality", result4),
]
for name, r in scenarios:
score = r['overall']['score']
status = r['overall']['status']
print(f" {name:<38} {score:>5.1f} {status}")
print("-" * 60)
print("\nAll scenario results saved to test_run/scenario_*/")
print("Each folder contains: counts.csv, metadata.csv, qc_results.json")