Skip to content

Issues: AztecProtocol/barretenberg

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
5 Open 3 Closed
5 Open 3 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Connect subtable commitments between main protocol and merge merge protocol Having to do with the goblin EC op merge protocol
#1270 opened Feb 25, 2025 by ledwards2225
1
Possible Merge/OpQueue improvements merge protocol Having to do with the goblin EC op merge protocol
#1267 opened Feb 24, 2025 by ledwards2225
ClientIVC soundness: HidingCircuit, ECCVM, and Translator must share the transcript bug Something isn't working merge protocol Having to do with the goblin EC op merge protocol
#1262 opened Feb 19, 2025 by iakovenkos
1
@iakovenkos
Avoiding zero in bach muls merge protocol Having to do with the goblin EC op merge protocol
#905 opened Mar 12, 2024 by codygunton
@maramihali
2
Uniform handling of points at infinity in biggroup merge protocol Having to do with the goblin EC op merge protocol
#871 opened Feb 27, 2024 by codygunton
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.