You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Retailer IQ recommender work spans architecture, a search-enrichment-hosted recommendation-agent capability, live/demo notebooks, and the root executive UI. It should not remain attached to the documentation-review issue because it changes runtime behavior, API surface, tests, and the primary UI experience.
Acceptance criteria checklist
Define Product IQ, Customer IQ, RecommenderIQ, and Retailer IQ boundaries in the roadmap documentation.
Implement recommendation-agent capability in search-enrichment-agent with candidate, rank, compose, explain, feedback, and model-status surfaces.
Expose recommendation-agent REST and MCP entry points without moving experimental logic into shared lib prematurely.
Add focused Python tests for recommendation candidate generation, ranking, composition, REST, and MCP behavior.
Add Retailer IQ recommender notebooks for live validation and executive demo storytelling.
Update the root UI into an executive Retailer IQ cockpit with explicit recommendation proof controls.
Improve root UI responsiveness by avoiding blocking intro animation, forced snap scrolling, automatic first-load streaming, and eager lower-section API calls.
Validate TypeScript and focused root page rendering.
Risks and dependencies
Depends on search-enrichment-agent remaining the host for the recommendation-agent capability until a dedicated service boundary is justified.
Root UI changes touch first-viewport user experience and must avoid regressing existing drill-down routes.
The recommendation model is a deterministic/classical baseline and should remain replaceable by future managed model lifecycle work.
Live notebook endpoints depend on deployed development environment availability.
Impacted ADRs: ADR-018 for branch naming and PR traceability. Architecture boundaries may require a follow-up ADR if RecommenderIQ graduates from an app-local capability to a dedicated service or shared library contract. No existing ADR is updated in this save-progress commit.
BPMN process section
%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor':'#FFB3BA',
'primaryTextColor':'#000',
'primaryBorderColor':'#FF8B94',
'lineColor':'#BAE1FF',
'secondaryColor':'#BAE1FF',
'tertiaryColor':'#FFFFFF'
}}}%%
flowchart LR
A[Analyze Current Code] --> B[Design Change]
B --> C[Implement on Issue Branch]
C --> D[Open PR]
D --> E[Validation and Fixes]
E --> F[Merge to Main]
F --> G[Monitor Workflows]
G --> H[Close Issue and Cleanup]
Problem statement
The Retailer IQ recommender work spans architecture, a search-enrichment-hosted recommendation-agent capability, live/demo notebooks, and the root executive UI. It should not remain attached to the documentation-review issue because it changes runtime behavior, API surface, tests, and the primary UI experience.
Acceptance criteria checklist
Risks and dependencies
Evidence links
ADR impact
Impacted ADRs: ADR-018 for branch naming and PR traceability. Architecture boundaries may require a follow-up ADR if RecommenderIQ graduates from an app-local capability to a dedicated service or shared library contract. No existing ADR is updated in this save-progress commit.
BPMN process section
%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor':'#FFB3BA', 'primaryTextColor':'#000', 'primaryBorderColor':'#FF8B94', 'lineColor':'#BAE1FF', 'secondaryColor':'#BAE1FF', 'tertiaryColor':'#FFFFFF' }}}%% flowchart LR A[Analyze Current Code] --> B[Design Change] B --> C[Implement on Issue Branch] C --> D[Open PR] D --> E[Validation and Fixes] E --> F[Merge to Main] F --> G[Monitor Workflows] G --> H[Close Issue and Cleanup]