Use full name when cross referencing a class from a different module

[kexugit]

• Package Name: azure-storage-queue
• Package Version: 12.12.0
• Operating System:
• Python Version:

Describe the bug
Azure API reference doc has unresolved xref links (example). This is because when cross referencing classes from another module, full class name was not used (example).

According to EngHub FAQ, when partners are cross referencing a class that does not exist in the same module, the full name of referred class is required for resolving this xref correctly.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/python/api/azure-storage-queue//azure.storage.queue.aio.queueclient?view=azure-python&branch=main#keyword-only-parameters
2. Notice the unresolved xref links.

Expected behavior
Xref links are properly resolved.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the feedback! We are routing this to the appropriate team for follow-up. cc @jalauzon-msft @vincenttran-msft.

[github-actions]

Hi @kexugit, I'm an AI Support assistant here to help with your issue. While the Azure SDK team reviews your request, I wanted to provide some possible tips and documentation that might help you in the meantime.

• The xref links are unresolved because the reference does not use the full, fully qualified class name when referring to classes from another module.
• According to the EngHub FAQ, when cross referencing a class that exists outside the current module, the full class name is required.
• The example in _queue_client.py shows the reference without the fully qualified name, which leads to the unresolved xref link issue.
• Updating the documentation to reference the full class name should resolve the xref links as expected.

The Azure SDK team will respond to your issue shortly. I hope these suggestions are helpful in the meantime. If this comment helped you, please give it a 👍. If the suggestion was not helpful or incorrect, please give it a 👎. Your feedback helps us improve!

[kristapratico]

Thanks for pointing this out @kexugit! The team will get this fixed as soon as possible.