| name | llm-serving-auto-benchmark |
|---|---|
| description | Framework-independent LLM serving benchmark skill for comparing SGLang, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, TokenSpeed, or another serving framework. Use when a user wants to find the best deployment command for one model across multiple serving frameworks under the same workload, GPU budget, and latency SLA. |
Use this skill to compare LLM serving frameworks such as SGLang, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and TokenSpeed for the same model and workload.
Use a config-driven workflow:
- keep launch-only capacity choices in each framework's
base_server_flags - put the search knobs in
search_space - run the same dataset scenarios for every framework
- generate a bounded candidate list from
search_space, with the baseline candidate included first - keep failed candidates in the result file
- pick the best SLA-passing candidate after normalizing the results
For model-specific starting points, prefer the shipped configs in
configs/cookbook-llm/. They define a framework-neutral LLM serving cookbook
model set and translate each entry into framework-native SGLang, vLLM, and
TensorRT-LLM, and TokenSpeed server flags. Validate those configs before a real
run:
python skills/llm-serving-auto-benchmark/scripts/validate_cookbook_configs.py \
skills/llm-serving-auto-benchmark/configs/cookbook-llm/*.yamlIf you have captured target-environment --help files, add
--help-dir <artifact-help-dir>. That check only loads configs, verifies the
server flag names, and renders candidate commands; it does not launch model
servers.
Prefer native tooling when it gives better coverage:
- SGLang:
python -m sglang.auto_benchmarkwhen available, otherwisepython -m sglang.bench_serving - vLLM:
vllm bench sweep servefor server-parameter sweeps, otherwisevllm serveplusvllm bench serve - TensorRT-LLM:
trtllm-servefor the OpenAI-compatible server plus the TensorRT-LLM serving benchmark client or a common OpenAI-compatible benchmark client - TokenSpeed:
tokenspeed servefor the OpenAI-compatible server plustokenspeed bench serveor the same OpenAI-compatible benchmark client used for the other frameworks
TensorRT-LLM has one hard scope rule in this skill: the server backend is fixed
to trtllm-serve serve --backend pytorch. Do not search TensorRT-LLM backend
choice. If a request, config, or candidate asks for trt, an engine backend, or
any other non-PyTorch TensorRT-LLM server backend, reject that candidate as
unsupported for this skill and record the reason. This does not change the
benchmark client backend; the TensorRT-LLM benchmark client still uses
OpenAI-compatible modes such as --backend openai or --backend openai-chat.
Only pick a winner after each requested framework has had its main serving knobs tuned.
Framework selection is caller-controlled. If the caller explicitly supplies a framework list, benchmark only those enabled frameworks. Do not silently add TensorRT-LLM or TokenSpeed just because cookbook configs or history docs exist; record omitted frameworks as user-excluded, not unsupported.
The parameter lists in this skill are not a compatibility contract. They are
version-sensitive candidate knob families. Before every real run, record the
exact framework version or git commit and verify the concrete CLI flag names
with --help in the target environment.
The default search style is framework-neutral: start from a mostly pure-TP baseline, sweep a small set of high-impact runtime knobs, and cap the first pass around 10 candidates per framework. Do not search memory fractions by default.
This skill is target-agnostic. It assumes any one of the following is available, and nothing more:
- a local GPU host with Docker/Podman and the target framework images pulled;
- a remote GPU host reached via
ssh <host>with the framework images already running in a container there; - a CI runner that can exec into a pre-built image for each framework.
Do not assume a specific operator host name inside this skill's own workflow. The concrete SSH wiring, container names, workspace paths, and HF token plumbing for a given box live in operator-side per-host skills; this skill only requires that the caller can reach a shell inside a container with the requested framework installed.
Reference files are optional and version-sensitive. Treat historical flag notes as evidence from one image, not as a compatibility guarantee for the next run.
Additional H100 validation on 2026-05-01 used two 2-card models with a
bounded search of two SGLang memory-fraction candidates and two vLLM
memory-utilization candidates. The workload was random input 512, output
64, 8 prompts, and 2 warmup requests, only to prove the search and summary
path can finish quickly.
| Model | GPUs | Best SGLang | Best vLLM | Artifact root |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Qwen/Qwen3-8B |
2x H100, TP=2 | sglang_mem086, 21.64 req/s, 1385.05 output tok/s, mean TTFT 70.54 ms |
vllm_mem080, 22.88 req/s, 1464.25 output tok/s, mean TTFT 60.56 ms |
/data/bbuf/validate/core_skill_validation_20260501/qwen3_8b/auto_benchmark |
mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 |
2x H100, TP=2 | sglang_mem080, 24.09 req/s, 1541.92 output tok/s, mean TTFT 61.47 ms |
vllm_mem090, 24.76 req/s, 1584.54 output tok/s, mean TTFT 58.63 ms |
/data/bbuf/validate/core_skill_validation_20260501/mistral_7b_instruct_v03/auto_benchmark |
Additional B200 smoke validation on 2026-06-27 used GPUC5A6
(cirrascale-gpuc5a6) in container sglang_bbuf, artifact root
/data/bbuf/ai_infra_skills_pr72_20260627. The target image had SGLang
0.5.13.post1 installed, but no vllm, trtllm-serve, or tokenspeed
CLI in that container, so only SGLang was model-smoked and the missing
frameworks were recorded as environment gaps, not as unsupported frameworks.
| Model | GPU | Result |
|---|---|---|
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct |
1x B200 | 5 random prompts completed; GPU memory returned to 0 MiB |
Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct |
1x B200 | 5 random prompts completed; GPU memory returned to 0 MiB |
Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct |
1x B200 | 5 random prompts completed; GPU memory returned to 0 MiB |
Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct |
1x B200 | 5 random prompts completed; GPU memory returned to 0 MiB |
Qwen/Qwen3-8B |
1x B200 | 5 random prompts completed; GPU memory returned to 0 MiB |
The same B200 refresh ran the cookbook validator against captured help
snapshots. Missing-command help captures such as trtllm-serve_missing.txt
are now ignored unless at least one real --flag is present, preventing a
missing framework binary from being misreported as hundreds of unsupported
framework flags.
This skill is a playbook plus a config+validator toolchain, not a turn-key orchestrator. The operator still launches servers, drives workloads, and writes one normalized JSONL row per candidate.
The scripts/ directory contains exactly two tools:
validate_cookbook_configs.py: load cookbook YAML, render bounded candidate server commands, and check flag names against captured--helpsnapshots without launching servers.compare_benchmark_results.py: turn normalized per-candidate JSONL into the markdown and optional CSV tables described in the Output Contract.
Cookbook configs under configs/cookbook-llm/ must pass the validator. The
shorter references/example-plan.yaml is a
one-off runtime-plan skeleton and is not expected to pass as-is. Use
references/result-schema.md as the single source
of truth for SLA key names.
Collect these before a long run:
- model and tokenizer path, target frameworks, GPU model/count, multi-node allowance, precision, and quantization constraints
- endpoint shape, workload source, dataset scenarios, SLA target, search budget, and artifact output directory
- version manifest: framework package version or git commit, container/Python
environment,
--helpsnapshots, and whether each search parameter was accepted by that exact CLI
If real production traffic is the goal, use the real request distribution. A synthetic workload is fine for bring-up and first-pass comparison, but it is not enough for a production choice.
Record each scenario's input/output length distribution in the normalized
result rows. This is now part of the profiler handoff contract: if SGLang is
slower and sglang-sota-humanize-loop invokes llm-torch-profiler-analysis,
the profiler workload must reuse the slow SGLang benchmark scenario lengths
instead of falling back to its generic prefill 4090->1 and decode 1->2048
defaults.
Short list of failure modes that have bitten past validation runs. Check these before starting a long sweep.
- SGLang
fa3attention backends need Hopper or newer. On A100, L40S, RTX 5090, and older GPUs, dropfa3from the SGLangsearch_spaceand keepflashinfer(ortritonwhen FlashInfer is unavailable). - SGLang
bench_servinghas two SGLang-facing backends:--backend sglangfor the native/generateendpoint and--backend sglang-oaifor the OpenAI-compatible endpoint. For cross-framework comparisons, prefersglang-oaiso every framework is measured on the same request path. - vLLM
--enable-dboonly works when the target vLLM image is built with a supported all2all backend. Keep DBO out of the default candidate list unless the operator has verified the image. - vLLM
--max-num-partial-prefills > 1is model- and runtime-gated. Keep1in the default pass; raise only after a preflight with the actual model. - vLLM current mainline was checked on 2026-06-27 at
091d13976c1c246714bb2112dd2e208561dda6a3and includes PR#46735fixing CUDA graph capture in Triton / NVFP4-emulation MoE. If a target image predates it, treat Triton-MoE graph-capture failures or eager fallback as an image/runtime issue before scoring it against SGLang. - The same vLLM refresh includes PR
#44800(VLLM_GPU_SYNC_CHECK). For sync-heavy profiler rows, record whether the target image exposes this debug knob before labeling the gap as kernel-local. - TensorRT-LLM mainline was checked on 2026-06-27 at
aaffa2f9fef3025e0f698d978385a73460344e0b. Keepkv_cache_free_gpu_memory_fractionin shipped configs until the targettrtllm-serve serve --helpproves a shorter alias is accepted. - TensorRT-LLM current mainline includes PR
#11685and PR#15546, which affect KV block eviction and KV block-offset host staging. If a target image predates them, record stale-runtime risk when cache pressure, block-offset races, or prefix/KV residency affect benchmark rows. - The historical TensorRT-LLM 1.0.0 multi-GPU PyTorch-backend validation used
--ipc=host,--ulimit memlock=-1,--ulimit stack=67108864,--shm-size=16g, andNCCL_IB_DISABLE=1(for single-node) or an equivalent NCCL setup. Keep these as a starting point, not as a version-independent requirement. - TensorRT-LLM current mainline still exposes benchmark client backends
openaiandopenai-chat, nottrtllm. This is separate from the server backend, which is pinned topytorchby this skill. trtllmbenchmark_serving --dataset-name randomsilently falls back to ShareGPT sampling without--random-ids(or--download-path).- TokenSpeed is a fast-moving engine. Current mainline checked on 2026-06-27 at
lightseekorg/tokenspeed@d0a7faddb5ec0d4c6d037c4c3e6a781d2c5164a8exposestokenspeed serve,tokenspeed bench,tokenspeed env, andtokenspeed version. Its server command istokenspeed serve <model>, not apython -m tokenspeedentrypoint. - TokenSpeed's SGLang/vLLM-compatible parameter names are not always identical
in meaning. Prefer
--max-model-len,--max-num-seqs,--chunked-prefill-size,--max-prefill-tokens,--max-total-tokens,--tensor-parallel-size,--attn-tp-size,--moe-tp-size,--enable-expert-parallel,--attention-backend,--moe-backend,--kv-cache-dtype, and speculative flags only after confirming the targettokenspeed serve --helpoutput. - TokenSpeed has an agentic benchmark path in-tree. When the workload is
multi-turn or tool-heavy, add a TokenSpeed-native
tokenspeed bench serveor EvalScope-style run beside the common OpenAI-compatible client and record both result files in the same normalized row set. max_seq_len/max_model_len/context_lengthcandidates must covermax(input_len + output_len)across every scenario, including values insidesearch_space, not just the baseline. The validator checks this; do not bypass it.
- Never print
HF_TOKEN,HUGGINGFACE_HUB_TOKEN, or any upstream API key into a saved artifact. Pass them through container-e VAR(unquoted on the right side so the host value is inherited) and keep them out ofserver_commandandbenchmark_commandfields written to the result JSONL. - When a framework echoes the full argv at startup, scrub the log or redact token-shaped substrings before uploading the artifact.
Use these rules throughout the benchmark:
- Run every framework on the same GPU type, GPU count, model weights, tokenizer, precision, quantization policy, prompt distribution, output length target, and sampling settings.
- Record framework version, git commit, container image, CUDA/NCCL versions, GPU driver, visible GPU ids, launch command, and benchmark command.
- Warm the server before measuring. Restart or clear state between candidate configurations when cache effects would bias the comparison.
- Compare steady-state fixed-QPS runs separately from burst throughput runs.
- Keep failed candidates in the final results with their failure reason.
- Report both raw throughput and SLA-passing throughput. The fastest failing candidate is not the best deployment command.
Verify SGLang plus all requested comparison frameworks before starting a search. Run only the commands for the requested framework set:
python -m sglang.launch_server --help
python -m sglang.bench_serving --help
vllm serve --help
vllm serve --help=all
vllm bench serve --help
vllm bench serve --help=all
vllm bench sweep serve --help=all
trtllm-serve serve --help
python -m tensorrt_llm.serve.scripts.benchmark_serving --help
tokenspeed serve --help
tokenspeed bench --help
tokenspeed bench serve --helpUse the framework-specific --help output in the target environment as the
source of truth. Do not keep a stale launch flag just because it appears in an
old note.
vLLM 0.19 and newer use grouped help. Plain vllm serve --help only shows the
groups, so capture --help=all before deciding whether a search knob exists.
Save these --help outputs into the run artifact directory. If a listed search
knob is missing from the current CLI, remove or translate that knob before
running the benchmark. Do not silently pass unknown flags.
For TensorRT-LLM, also confirm that trtllm-serve serve --help accepts
--backend pytorch. If it does not, mark TensorRT-LLM unsupported in that
environment rather than falling back to a different server backend.
For TokenSpeed, confirm both the server and benchmark entrypoints because some
installations alias the binary as ts. Record the exact binary used in
server_command.
For each framework, launch a minimal server, confirm /v1/models or the native
model-info endpoint, send one streaming request, run one tiny benchmark with at
least 5 requests, then save the launch command, benchmark command, server log,
and benchmark output.
Before any GPU-backed smoke run, check the requested GPU ids directly with
nvidia-smi. If a requested GPU is already in use, stop and record that fact.
Do not silently borrow a different GPU count for a performance comparison. It is
fine to run a smaller one-GPU smoke only when the result is clearly labeled as a
flow check rather than a fair throughput comparison.
If the target environment runs through containers, follow references/container-runbook.md and save image tags, pull commands, launch/benchmark logs, and cleanup commands.
Use one canonical workload for all frameworks. Recommended JSONL row shape:
{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this text."}], "output_len": 256}
{"prompt": "Write a short explanation of CUDA graphs.", "output_len": 128}Optional fields:
{
"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "Use low temperature."}],
"output_len": 256,
"extra_request_body": {"temperature": 0.0, "top_p": 0.95},
"metadata": {"source": "prod-sample"}
}When converting user data:
- inspect at least 3 rows before conversion
- preserve request-level sampling options in
extra_request_body - do not include the final assistant answer in the prompt when that answer is the target completion
- keep multimodal or tool-call payloads only if all requested frameworks support the chosen endpoint shape
For synthetic bring-up, use the shipped two-scenario shape:
dataset:
kind: random
num_prompts: 80
scenario_names: [chat, summarization]
input_len: [1000, 8000]
output_len: [1000, 1000]Each aligned input_len / output_len pair is one scenario. Do not take the
cartesian product unless the user asks for that.
Name each scenario and keep the aligned pair in the artifacts. For custom
datasets, compute or record representative input_len and output_len
buckets, at least p50 and p95 when possible, so later profiler runs can match
the slow bucket rather than profiling an unrelated synthetic shape.
Before searching any sequence-length limit, compute the largest
input_len + output_len in the dataset. SGLang context_length, vLLM
max_model_len, TensorRT-LLM max_seq_len, and TokenSpeed max_model_len
must be at least that value for every candidate that is expected to run all
scenarios.
Use the smallest tier that can answer the user's question:
- Tier 1: smoke and sanity. One baseline plus a few high-impact knobs.
- Tier 2: default. A bounded sweep over the most likely server settings.
- Tier 3: exhaustive. Only when the search space is already tight and the user accepts a long run.
Default budget:
num_prompts: 80for the default cross-framework comparison;num_prompts: 20per scenario is acceptable for a smoke/flow check and must be labeled as such in the artifact (not as a performance result).search.max_candidates_per_framework: 10for the first useful pass- candidate generation: baseline first, then a bounded product or ordered
candidate list from
search_space - at most 5 QPS search rounds unless the user asks for more
- stop early when every candidate in one framework is clearly OOM or fails the basic health check
Keep these in base_server_flags unless the user specifically wants a capacity
or memory study:
- SGLang
mem_fraction_static - SGLang
schedule_policy - vLLM
gpu_memory_utilization - TensorRT-LLM
kv_cache_free_gpu_memory_fraction - TokenSpeed
gpu_memory_utilization
These are real knobs, but they widen the search quickly and often turn a serving comparison into a memory-limit study.
Prefer the SGLang auto-benchmark runner when the target checkout supports it:
python -m sglang.auto_benchmark run --config /path/to/sglang.yamlOtherwise launch the server manually and benchmark with:
python -m sglang.bench_serving \
--backend sglang \
--dataset-name random \
--random-input-len 1024 \
--random-output-len 256 \
--num-prompts 80 \
--request-rate 8 \
--output-file /path/to/sglang/results.json \
--output-detailsVersion-sensitive SGLang knob families to verify:
tp_size,pp_size,dp_size,ep_sizeattention_backend,prefill_attention_backend,decode_attention_backendsampling_backendmax_running_requests,max_queued_requestschunked_prefill_size,prefill_max_requests,max_prefill_tokensmax_total_tokens,page_size- CUDA graph and piecewise CUDA graph settings
- speculative or EAGLE settings only after the non-speculative baseline is tuned
Keep mem_fraction_static and schedule_policy pinned in the default pass,
matching the shared cookbook config style.
For quick smoke tests, it is reasonable to disable CUDA graph and piecewise CUDA graph startup work if the goal is only to prove the framework flow. Record those flags in the artifact. Do not carry that smoke setting into a performance winner unless the user asked to tune eager-mode serving.
Use vLLM's sweep runner when available:
vllm bench sweep serve \
--serve-cmd 'vllm serve <model> --port 8000' \
--bench-cmd 'vllm bench serve --backend vllm --model <model> --port 8000 --dataset-name random --num-prompts 80' \
--serve-params /path/to/vllm_serve_params.json \
--bench-params /path/to/vllm_bench_params.json \
--output-dir /path/to/vllm_resultsIf sweep support is unavailable, run vllm serve for each candidate and measure
with vllm bench serve.
Version-sensitive vLLM knob families to verify:
- tensor, pipeline, data, decode-context, and expert parallelism
gpu_memory_utilizationmax_num_seqsmax_num_batched_tokensmax_model_lenenable_chunked_prefill, partial prefill limits, and DBO thresholds- KV cache dtype and block size
- dtype and quantization settings
- CUDA graph capture sizes or eager-mode toggles when relevant
- prefix cache and speculative decoding settings only when the workload needs those features
vLLM should get a normal sweep, not one baseline command. See
references/framework-reference.md for
native command templates and cross-framework knob families. Confirm each flag on
the target image's --help before a run.
Keep gpu_memory_utilization in the baseline for the default pass. Search it
only when the question is explicitly about fitting the model or trading capacity
against throughput.
Keep DBO and all2all backend settings out of the default pass unless the target
vLLM environment is already set up for them. They are real tuning knobs, but a
candidate can fail at startup if the required all2all backend is not available.
Also preflight concurrent partial prefill before raising
max_num_partial_prefills above 1; some model/runtime combinations reject it at
startup.
Use trtllm-serve serve as the server entrypoint when the target environment
supports it:
trtllm-serve serve <model> \
--backend pytorch \
--tp_size <tp> \
--pp_size <pp> \
--kv_cache_free_gpu_memory_fraction 0.75 \
--host 0.0.0.0 \
--port 8000Then benchmark the OpenAI-compatible endpoint with the TensorRT-LLM serving benchmark client or with the same OpenAI-compatible client used for the other frameworks.
In the historical TensorRT-LLM 1.0.0 validation image,
benchmark_serving --dataset-name random sampled from ShareGPT unless either
--download-path or --random-ids was passed. For a fast synthetic smoke test,
pass --random-ids, then confirm the behavior on the target TensorRT-LLM image.
TensorRT-LLM flag names are especially version-sensitive. In the validated
TensorRT-LLM 1.0.0 image, the KV-cache memory flag accepted by
trtllm-serve serve was --kv_cache_free_gpu_memory_fraction, not
--free_gpu_memory_fraction. Current mainline was rechecked at
aaffa2f9fef3025e0f698d978385a73460344e0b on 2026-06-27. Always verify flags
with trtllm-serve serve --help before running a search on any GPU target.
TensorRT-LLM backend policy for this skill:
- launch the server with
--backend pytorch - keep
backend: pytorchinbase_server_flags - do not add
backendtosearch_space - reject
trt, engine-backed serving, or any other non-PyTorch TensorRT-LLM server backend as unsupported for this skill
Version-sensitive TensorRT-LLM knob families to verify:
tp_size,pp_size, andep_size- max batch size, max sequence length, max number of tokens, and KV-cache budget
- inflight batching and scheduler options
- extra LLM API options YAML used by
trtllm-servewith the PyTorch backend
The trtllm-serve serve CLI exposes fewer direct runtime knobs than SGLang or
vLLM. Use direct flags when they exist, then use --extra_llm_api_options for
PyTorch-backend settings that are not top-level CLI flags. Keep unsupported
backend or engine requests in the failure table instead of translating them.
Keep kv_cache_free_gpu_memory_fraction in the baseline for the default pass.
Search max_batch_size, max_num_tokens, max_seq_len, and validated
PyTorch-backend config options first. The server backend remains fixed to
pytorch.
Use TokenSpeed as a first-class comparison framework, especially for agentic or multi-turn workloads where it may be the strongest non-SGLang baseline:
tokenspeed serve <model> \
--host 0.0.0.0 \
--port 8000 \
--tensor-parallel-size <tp> \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \
--max-model-len 12288 \
--max-num-seqs 64 \
--chunked-prefill-size 8192 \
--kv-cache-dtype auto \
--trust-remote-codeBenchmark either with TokenSpeed's native online serving benchmark:
tokenspeed bench serve \
--base-url http://127.0.0.1:8000 \
--model <model> \
--dataset-name random \
--random-input-len 1024 \
--random-output-len 256 \
--num-prompts 80or with the same OpenAI-compatible client used for the other frameworks. When TokenSpeed is a likely leader and profiler handoff will be needed, the native benchmark can also arm torch profiling for the same request shape:
tokenspeed bench serve \
--base-url http://127.0.0.1:8000 \
--model <model> \
--dataset-name random \
--random-input-len 1024 \
--random-output-len 256 \
--num-prompts 80 \
--profile \
--profile-num-steps 5 \
--extra-body '{"output_dir":"/data/bbuf/profiles/tokenspeed","activities":["CPU","GPU"],"with_stack":true,"profile_id":"ts-bench"}'If output_dir is not supplied, TokenSpeed writes under
TOKENSPEED_PROFILER_DIR, defaulting to /tmp.
For large MoE or agentic checkpoints, validate these TokenSpeed knobs before adding them to the search:
tensor_parallel_size,attn_tp_size,moe_tp_size, andenable_expert_parallelattention_backend,drafter_attention_backend,moe_backend, anddraft_moe_backendmax_num_seqs,chunked_prefill_size,max_prefill_tokens, andmax_total_tokenskv_cache_dtype,quantization, and prefix-cache controls- speculative flags such as
speculative_algorithm,speculative_num_steps, andspeculative_num_draft_tokens comm_fusion_max_num_tokens,enable_allreduce_fusion, and related communication-fusion flags only after a target-image smoke run
If a TokenSpeed-native agentic config exists for the same model family, run it
as an additional workload lane rather than replacing the common cross-framework
scenario. Normalize its result rows with the same schema and mark
workload.kind accordingly.
Keep gpu_memory_utilization pinned in the default pass. Search it only when
the user explicitly wants a capacity study.
Write one JSONL row per candidate using the schema in references/result-schema.md. Then run:
python skills/llm-serving-auto-benchmark/scripts/compare_benchmark_results.py \
--input /path/to/candidates.jsonl \
--output /path/to/summary.mdRank candidates in this order:
- SLA passed
- highest request throughput or goodput
- highest output token throughput
- lower p50 TTFT
- lower p50 TPOT/ITL
- lower GPU count or simpler deployment if performance is close
Keep the SLA gate itself unchanged. In the cookbook configs and normalized
result schema, TTFT SLA still uses max_p50_ttft_ms and TPOT SLA still uses
max_p50_tpot_ms; only the default cross-candidate comparison order switches
to p50 TTFT and p50 TPOT.
Return a compact report with workload/SLA, hardware and framework versions, best deployment-command tables per framework/scenario, one cross-framework comparison table, exact launch and benchmark commands for winners, and artifact paths for workload, raw/normalized results, CSV or markdown summary, and server logs.
When SGLang is not the winner, include a profiler handoff note with the slow
SGLang scenario name and the exact input/output lengths or percentile bucket to
pass to llm-torch-profiler-analysis.
When a candidate uses speculative decoding, prefix cache, offload, or an agentic workload, record the optional normalized fields for accept length, pre-scheduler time, cache hit rate, and memory residency. The summary script will display those columns when present.
Include failed or excluded candidates with reasons. Explain that this table is a record of tried configs that were not selected: candidates that failed, were skipped by policy, or completed but missed the SLA. Add caveats for synthetic workloads, incomplete fair searches, or framework-specific parameter substitutions.
Use references/framework-reference.md when you need command templates, source links, or knob-family mappings. Use references/example-plan.yaml as the starting point for a full cross-framework run plan.