Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
854 lines (634 loc) · 26.8 KB

upgrade-strategies.md

File metadata and controls

854 lines (634 loc) · 26.8 KB

Dependency Management and Upgrade Strategies

This document outlines the best practices and standards for managing and upgrading dependencies across Bayat projects.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Effective dependency management is crucial for maintaining secure, stable, and maintainable software projects. This document provides guidelines for selecting, managing, upgrading, and auditing dependencies in a consistent and efficient manner.

Why Dependency Management Matters

  • Security: Outdated dependencies often contain known vulnerabilities
  • Performance: Newer versions often include performance improvements
  • Features: Stay current with latest features and capabilities
  • Compatibility: Ensure continued compatibility with other components
  • Technical Debt: Prevent accumulation of debt from outdated dependencies
  • Support: Vendors eventually drop support for older versions

Dependency Management Principles

Core Principles

  1. Minimalism: Use as few dependencies as necessary
  2. Intentionality: Every dependency should serve a clear purpose
  3. Sustainability: Prefer actively maintained dependencies
  4. Stability: Balance staying current with maintaining stability
  5. Visibility: Maintain a clear inventory of all dependencies
  6. Consistency: Use consistent versions across projects when possible
  7. Security-First: Prioritize security updates over feature updates

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Dependency Hell: Accumulating too many interdependent packages
  2. Version Freezing: Never updating dependencies
  3. Update Anxiety: Constant major version updates without testing
  4. Transitive Dependency Blindness: Not knowing what your dependencies depend on
  5. Overly Optimistic Versioning: Using * or latest instead of specific versions
  6. Overly Pessimistic Versioning: Pinning to exact versions without room for patches

Dependency Selection Criteria

When evaluating a new dependency, consider:

Technical Factors

  1. Feature Match: How well it meets functional requirements
  2. Performance: Resource usage and efficiency
  3. Bundle Size: Impact on application size
  4. API Design: Quality and intuitiveness of the API
  5. Extensibility: Ability to extend or customize behavior
  6. Documentation: Quality and completeness of documentation
  7. Type Definitions: Availability of type definitions (for typed languages)
  8. Test Coverage: Extent and quality of test coverage

Community and Support Factors

  1. Maintenance Activity: Frequency of updates
  2. Community Size: Adoption in the developer community
  3. Issue Resolution: Response time to issues and PRs
  4. Bus Factor: Number of active maintainers
  5. Commercial Support: Availability of paid support if needed
  6. Stack Overflow Activity: Community knowledge base
  7. Release Cadence: Predictable, well-managed releases

Organizational Factors

  1. Licensing: Compliance with organizational license policies
  2. Security History: Track record of security issues
  3. Alignment: Strategic fit with technology roadmap
  4. Internal Expertise: Team familiarity with the dependency
  5. Long-term Viability: Expected longevity of the dependency

Decision Matrix Template

Criteria Weight Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Feature completeness High ★★★★☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★
Performance Medium ★★★★★ ★★★★☆ ★★☆☆☆
Maintenance activity High ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
Bundle size Medium ★★★★☆ ★★★★★ ★★☆☆☆
Community support Medium ★★★★☆ ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆
License compatibility High ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★
Documentation Medium ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
TOTAL 75% 86% 70%

Versioning and Constraints

Semantic Versioning

All Bayat projects should follow and respect Semantic Versioning (SemVer):

  • Major version (1.0.0): Incompatible API changes
  • Minor version (0.1.0): Add functionality in a backward-compatible manner
  • Patch version (0.0.1): Backward-compatible bug fixes

Version Constraints

Use appropriate version constraints based on the stability of the dependency:

Constraint Type Example Use When Risk Level
Exact 1.2.3 For mission-critical dependencies with specific tested versions Low risk, high stability
Patch Range 1.2.x or ~1.2.3 For stable dependencies where patches are low risk Low-medium risk
Minor Range 1.x or ^1.2.3 For reliable dependencies with good backward compatibility Medium risk
Major Range >=1.2.3 Generally not recommended except for development tools High risk
Unbounded * or latest Never use in production code Extremely high risk

Version Resolution Strategy

  1. Lock Files: Always commit lock files (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, Pipfile.lock, etc.)
  2. Resolution Strategy: In case of version conflicts, document the resolution strategy
  3. Peer Dependencies: Be aware of and document peer dependency requirements

Dependency Evaluation Framework

Establish a structured framework for evaluating dependencies:

Initial Evaluation

For new dependencies, complete the Dependency Evaluation Form:

Dependency Evaluation Form
--------------------------
Package Name: 
Purpose: 
Alternative Packages Considered:
Version Selected:
License:
Security Scan Results:
Bundle Size Impact:
Maintenance Activity:
Major Contributors:
Test Coverage:
Documentation Quality:
Breaking Change History:
Approved By:
Date:

Periodic Re-Evaluation

Re-evaluate critical dependencies regularly:

  1. Mission-Critical: Every 3 months
  2. Important: Every 6 months
  3. Standard: Annually

Health Score Calculation

Calculate a Dependency Health Score using:

  • Months since last release (fewer is better)
  • Number of open issues vs. closed issues
  • Number of active contributors
  • Security vulnerabilities history
  • Breaking changes frequency
  • Test coverage percentage
  • Documentation completeness

Dependency Inventory and Auditing

Dependency Inventory

Maintain a comprehensive inventory of dependencies:

  1. Direct Dependencies: Dependencies explicitly included in your project
  2. Transitive Dependencies: Dependencies of your dependencies
  3. Development Dependencies: Used only during development
  4. Optional Dependencies: Used in specific configurations

Regular Auditing

Perform regular dependency audits:

  1. Security Audit: Check for known vulnerabilities
  2. License Audit: Ensure license compliance
  3. Usage Audit: Identify unused or duplicate dependencies
  4. Update Audit: Identify outdated dependencies

Dependency Visualization

Use visualization tools to understand dependency relationships:

  1. Dependency Graphs: Visualize the hierarchy of dependencies
  2. Impact Analysis: Understand the impact of updating a specific dependency

Update Strategies

Update Frequency

Establish a regular cadence for dependency updates:

  1. Security Updates: Immediate
  2. Patch Updates: Monthly
  3. Minor Updates: Quarterly
  4. Major Updates: Planned with feature releases

Update Approaches

Choose the appropriate update approach based on project phase and criticality:

  1. Continuous Updates: Regularly update to latest compatible versions

    • Best for: Active development, lower criticality systems
    • Advantages: Stay current, avoid large migrations
    • Challenges: Requires good test coverage, more frequent integration work
  2. Scheduled Batch Updates: Update groups of dependencies on a schedule

    • Best for: Stable systems, medium criticality
    • Advantages: Predictable, controlled impact
    • Challenges: Can create larger change sets
  3. LTS Alignment: Align with Long-Term Support versions of key dependencies

    • Best for: High criticality systems, regulated environments
    • Advantages: Stability, security, vendor support
    • Challenges: Can fall significantly behind latest features
  4. Feature-Driven Updates: Update when new features are needed

    • Best for: Mature, feature-stable products
    • Advantages: Clear business justification
    • Challenges: Can accumulate technical debt

Gradual Rollout Strategy for Major Updates

For major dependency updates, follow a gradual rollout:

  1. Research Phase: Understand breaking changes and migration path
  2. Prototype Phase: Create a proof-of-concept with the update
  3. Migration Planning: Develop a detailed migration plan
  4. Testing Environment: Apply the update in testing environment
  5. Canary Deployment: Deploy to a subset of production
  6. Full Rollout: Complete the migration
  7. Monitoring Period: Monitor for unexpected issues
  8. Retrospective: Document lessons learned

Security Vulnerability Management

Vulnerability Monitoring

Implement continuous monitoring for security vulnerabilities:

  1. Automated Scans: Use automated security scanning tools
  2. Vulnerability Databases: Monitor CVE databases and security advisories
  3. Vendor Security Bulletins: Subscribe to security notifications from vendors

Vulnerability Response Process

When a vulnerability is discovered:

  1. Assessment: Evaluate the severity and applicability
  2. Prioritization: Prioritize based on CVSS score and exposure
  3. Mitigation: Apply updates, patches, or workarounds
  4. Verification: Verify the vulnerability is resolved
  5. Documentation: Document the response for compliance purposes

Vulnerability Severity Levels and Response Times

Severity Level CVSS Score Response Time Update Window
Critical 9.0-10.0 Immediate 24 hours
High 7.0-8.9 Within 1 day 3 days
Medium 4.0-6.9 Within 1 week 2 weeks
Low 0.1-3.9 Within 30 days Next release

Breaking Changes Management

Breaking Change Identification

Techniques for identifying potential breaking changes:

  1. Release Notes Review: Thoroughly read release notes for new versions
  2. Changelog Analysis: Review detailed changelogs
  3. API Comparison: Use tools to compare API signatures between versions
  4. Test Coverage Analysis: Identify tests that will verify compatibility

Pre-Update Impact Analysis

Before applying breaking changes:

  1. Usage Analysis: Identify where and how the dependency is used
  2. Compatibility Testing: Test in a controlled environment
  3. Migration Planning: Document required code changes
  4. Rollback Planning: Establish a rollback plan

Post-Update Validation

After applying breaking changes:

  1. Regression Testing: Run comprehensive regression tests
  2. Integration Testing: Verify interactions with other components
  3. Performance Testing: Check for performance regressions
  4. Monitoring: Implement additional monitoring during transition

Automated Tooling

Recommended Automation Tools

Implement these tools to automate dependency management:

  1. Dependency Updates:

    • Dependabot
    • Renovate
    • npm-check-updates
    • pip-upgrader
    • Gradle Version Catalog
  2. Vulnerability Scanning:

    • OWASP Dependency-Check
    • Snyk
    • WhiteSource
    • GitHub Security Alerts
    • npm audit / yarn audit
  3. License Compliance:

    • FOSSA
    • WhiteSource
    • Black Duck
    • License Finder
  4. Dependency Analysis:

    • npm-ls
    • pipdeptree
    • Gradle buildDependents
    • Maven dependency:analyze

Automation Configuration Guidelines

Standard configurations for automated tools:

  1. Update Frequency: Configure automatic updates based on dependency type
  2. Grouping Rules: Group related dependencies for updating together
  3. Schedule Settings: Set update schedules to minimize disruption
  4. Approval Workflows: Configure approval requirements for different update types

Language-Specific Guidelines

JavaScript/TypeScript

  1. Package Manager: Use yarn or npm with strict lockfiles
  2. Type Definitions: Prefer packages with built-in TypeScript definitions
  3. Version Constraints: Use caret ranges (^1.2.3) for most dependencies
  4. Peer Dependencies: Be explicit about peer dependency requirements
  5. Tools: Use npm-check-updates, depcheck for dependency management
// Example package.json configuration
{
  "name": "bayat-project",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "dependencies": {
    "react": "^18.2.0",
    "react-dom": "^18.2.0"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "typescript": "^5.0.0",
    "jest": "^29.0.0"
  },
  "resolutions": {
    "critical-package": "1.2.3"
  },
  "engines": {
    "node": ">=18.0.0"
  }
}

Python

  1. Dependency Management: Use Poetry or Pipenv with lock files
  2. Virtual Environments: Always use virtual environments
  3. Version Constraints: Use compatible release specifiers (~=1.2.3)
  4. Tools: Use pip-audit, pip-requirements-check
# Example pyproject.toml with Poetry
[tool.poetry]
name = "bayat-project"
version = "1.0.0"

[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = "^3.10"
django = "^4.2"
requests = "^2.28"

[tool.poetry.dev-dependencies]
pytest = "^7.0"
mypy = "^1.0"

[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies]
black = "^23.0"

Java/Kotlin

  1. Build Tool: Use Gradle with version catalogs
  2. BOM: Utilize Bill of Materials for version consistency
  3. Version Constraints: Use strict version ranges for critical dependencies
  4. Tools: Use Gradle Versions Plugin, OWASP Dependency-Check
// Example Gradle version catalog (libs.versions.toml)
[versions]
spring-boot = "3.1.0"
kotlin = "1.8.21"
jackson = "2.14.2"

[libraries]
spring-boot-starter = { module = "org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter", version.ref = "spring-boot" }
spring-boot-starter-web = { module = "org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web", version.ref = "spring-boot" }
kotlin-stdlib = { module = "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib", version.ref = "kotlin" }
jackson-databind = { module = "com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind", version.ref = "jackson" }

[bundles]
spring = ["spring-boot-starter", "spring-boot-starter-web"]

[plugins]
spring-boot = { id = "org.springframework.boot", version.ref = "spring-boot" }
kotlin-jvm = { id = "org.jetbrains.kotlin.jvm", version.ref = "kotlin" }

C# and .NET

  1. Package Management: Use NuGet with PackageReference format
  2. Version Constraints: Use version ranges with minimum versions
  3. Central Package Management: Use Directory.Packages.props for multi-project solutions
  4. Tools: Use NuGet Package Explorer, dotnet outdated
<!-- Example Directory.Packages.props for centralized versioning -->
<Project>
  <PropertyGroup>
    <ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>true</ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>
  </PropertyGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
    <PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.App" Version="7.0.0" />
    <PackageVersion Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="13.0.3" />
    <PackageVersion Include="Serilog" Version="3.0.1" />
  </ItemGroup>
</Project>

<!-- In individual project files -->
<ItemGroup>
  <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.App" />
  <PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</ItemGroup>

Go

  1. Modules: Use Go modules (go.mod) for dependency management
  2. Version Selection: Use specific versions or commit hashes
  3. Vendoring: Consider vendoring dependencies for critical projects
  4. Tools: Use govulncheck, go mod tidy
// Example go.mod file
module github.com/bayat/project

go 1.20

require (
    github.com/gin-gonic/gin v1.9.1
    github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.7.1
    github.com/sirupsen/logrus v1.9.3
)

// Pin indirect dependencies when necessary
replace (
    github.com/critical-dependency/lib v1.2.3 => github.com/critical-dependency/lib v1.2.4
)

PHP

  1. Composer: Use Composer with specific version constraints
  2. Platform Requirements: Define PHP version and extension requirements
  3. Version Constraints: Use caret version constraints (^1.2.3)
  4. Tools: Use composer-require-checker, composer-unused
// Example composer.json
{
  "name": "bayat/project",
  "require": {
    "php": "^8.1",
    "laravel/framework": "^10.0",
    "guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.5"
  },
  "require-dev": {
    "phpunit/phpunit": "^10.0",
    "phpstan/phpstan": "^1.10"
  },
  "config": {
    "sort-packages": true
  }
}

Monorepo Dependency Management

Monorepo-Specific Challenges

  1. Version Consistency: Ensuring consistent versions across packages
  2. Interdependencies: Managing internal package dependencies
  3. Selective Updates: Updating dependencies for specific packages
  4. Hoisting: Handling dependency hoisting to reduce duplication

Monorepo Best Practices

  1. Centralized Version Management:

    • Use tools like Lerna, nx, or Yarn workspaces
    • Define shared dependencies in a root configuration
    • Implement version resolution strategies
  2. Dependency Graph Analysis:

    • Visualize internal dependency relationships
    • Analyze impact of updates on the entire repository
    • Identify circular dependencies
  3. Staged Updates:

    • Update shared dependencies first
    • Test affected packages
    • Update package-specific dependencies
  4. Release Coordination:

    • Coordinate releases of interrelated packages
    • Version internal dependencies appropriately
    • Document breaking changes across packages

Dependencies in CI/CD

CI/CD Pipeline Integration

  1. Dependency Installation: Optimize for CI/CD performance

    • Use dependency caching
    • Consider offline installations
  2. Automated Checks:

    • Verify lock file integrity
    • Scan for vulnerabilities
    • Check for outdated dependencies
    • Validate license compliance
  3. Integration Testing:

    • Test compatibility with updated dependencies
    • Run integration tests with latest dependencies

Dependency-Aware Deployment

  1. Verify Dependencies Before Deployment:

    • Ensure all dependencies are resolvable
    • Verify dependencies match lock files
  2. Dependency Considerations in Rollback Strategy:

    • Include dependency state in rollback procedures
    • Test rollbacks with dependency changes
  3. Environment Parity:

    • Ensure development, staging, and production use identical dependencies
    • Document any environment-specific dependency configurations

Dependency Documentation

Required Documentation

For each project, document:

  1. Core Dependencies List:

    • Purpose of each major dependency
    • Version selection rationale
    • Alternatives considered
  2. Dependency Update Policy:

    • Update frequency for different types of dependencies
    • Approval process for updates
    • Testing requirements for updates
  3. Known Issues and Workarounds:

    • Document known issues with specific versions
    • Include any applied patches or workarounds
  4. Version Constraints Rationale:

    • Explain unusual version constraints
    • Document version pinning reasons

Documentation Template

# Project Dependencies

## Core Dependencies

| Dependency | Version | Purpose | Alternatives Considered | Update Policy |
|------------|---------|---------|-------------------------|---------------|
| React | ^18.2.0 | UI framework | Vue, Angular | Quarterly minor updates |
| axios | ^1.3.0 | HTTP client | fetch API, SuperAgent | Monthly patch updates |

## Dependency Management

- **Update Schedule**: Security patches immediately, minor versions monthly, major versions quarterly
- **Update Responsibility**: DevOps team handles infrastructure dependencies, development team handles application dependencies
- **Pre-Update Testing**: Full test suite must pass before merging dependency updates

## Known Issues

- **[email protected]**: Memory leak in `_.debounce()` function. Workaround in `src/utils/debounce.js`
- **[email protected]**: Incompatible with our custom loaders. Pinned to 5.69.1 until fixed

## Custom Patches

- Applied custom patch to `node_modules/problem-package/index.js` for compatibility. See `patches/problem-package+1.0.0.patch`

Development Dependencies vs. Production Dependencies

Separating Development and Production Dependencies

  1. Clear Separation:

    • Clearly separate development and production dependencies
    • Use appropriate configuration in package managers
  2. Development Dependencies:

    • Testing frameworks and tools
    • Linters and formatters
    • Build tools
    • Development servers
    • Documentation generators
  3. Production Dependencies:

    • Runtime libraries
    • Application frameworks
    • Data processing libraries
    • API clients

Environment-Specific Dependencies

  1. Define Environment Tiers:

    • Development
    • Testing
    • Staging
    • Production
  2. Dependencies by Environment:

    • Document dependencies used in each environment
    • Validate environment parity for production dependencies

Self-Hosted vs. Third-Party Services

Evaluating Self-Hosted Options

When choosing between self-hosted and third-party dependencies:

  1. Evaluation Criteria:

    • Operational overhead
    • Security implications
    • Cost analysis
    • Reliability requirements
    • Customization needs
  2. Documentation Requirements:

    • Deployment requirements for self-hosted options
    • SLA and support terms for third-party services
    • Migration path between options
  3. Hybrid Approaches:

    • Using official Docker images for self-hosting
    • Self-hosting with vendor support
    • Cloud-managed open-source services

Legacy Project Considerations

Managing Dependencies in Legacy Projects

  1. Dependency Archaeology:

    • Document historical dependency decisions
    • Map current dependencies and their interactions
  2. Gradual Modernization Strategy:

    • Prioritize security updates
    • Create a phased update plan
    • Establish test coverage before major updates
  3. Working with Outdated Dependencies:

    • Vendor forking strategy when necessary
    • Minimal patching approach
    • Encapsulation to limit exposure to outdated code

Dealing with Unsupported Dependencies

When a dependency is no longer maintained:

  1. Risk Assessment:

    • Evaluate security implications
    • Assess functional risks
    • Consider future compatibility issues
  2. Action Plan:

    • Replace with an alternative
    • Fork and maintain internally
    • Encapsulate and isolate
    • Plan for gradual replacement

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Major Framework Update

Project: Customer Portal Application

Challenge: Upgrading from Angular 11 to Angular 15

Approach:

  1. Created a comprehensive inventory of all Angular dependencies
  2. Developed a test plan focusing on critical user journeys
  3. Implemented step-by-step upgrade through each major version
  4. Used feature flags to enable incremental migration
  5. Maintained dual implementations of critical components during transition

Results:

  • Successful migration with minimal user disruption
  • Improved performance metrics by 30%
  • Better maintainability and developer experience
  • Documented process for future framework updates

Case Study 2: Security Vulnerability Response

Project: Payment Processing Service

Challenge: Critical vulnerability in a core cryptography library

Approach:

  1. Implemented temporary mitigation measures
  2. Tested patch in isolated environment
  3. Deployed emergency update to all environments
  4. Conducted post-update security audit
  5. Improved dependency monitoring process

Results:

  • Vulnerability addressed within 4 hours of disclosure
  • No security breaches detected
  • Improved automated vulnerability scanning
  • Established clear security update protocols

Case Study 3: Reducing Dependency Bloat

Project: Mobile Application

Challenge: App size and startup time issues due to dependency bloat

Approach:

  1. Conducted comprehensive dependency audit
  2. Identified and removed unused dependencies
  3. Replaced heavy libraries with lighter alternatives
  4. Implemented code splitting and lazy loading
  5. Established dependency size budgets

Results:

  • Reduced app size by 40%
  • Improved startup time by 35%
  • Simplified maintenance requirements
  • Created clear guidelines for adding new dependencies

Appendix: Useful Tools

Dependency Management Tools

For JavaScript/TypeScript

  • npm/yarn/pnpm for package management
  • npm-check-updates for finding updates
  • depcheck for finding unused dependencies
  • bundlephobia for analyzing bundle size impact
  • npm audit for security checks

For Python

  • Poetry or Pipenv for dependency management
  • pip-audit for security checks
  • pipdeptree for visualizing dependencies
  • pyup.io for automated updates

For Java/Kotlin

  • Gradle Versions Plugin for finding updates
  • Maven Versions Plugin for Maven projects
  • Dependency-Track for security monitoring
  • JFrog Xray for deep dependency analysis

For .NET

  • NuGet Package Explorer
  • dotnet outdated
  • OWASP Dependency-Check
  • Snyk for .NET

For Go

  • govulncheck for vulnerability scanning
  • deps.dev for dependency insights
  • go mod why for understanding why a dependency is included
  • Renovate for automated updates

Dependency Visualization

  • npm-dependency-graph
  • Graphviz (with custom scripts)
  • dependency-cruiser
  • Snyk Dependency Tree
  • npm ls --all

Dependency Monitoring Services

  • Dependabot
  • Renovate
  • Snyk
  • FOSSA
  • WhiteSource
  • Debricked
  • Socket.dev

Automated Update Services

  • Dependabot
  • Renovate
  • Greenkeeper (for npm)
  • PyUp.io (for Python)
  • Gradle Release Plugin
  • Scala Steward (for Scala)