Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
419 lines (320 loc) · 10.8 KB

compliance-automation.md

File metadata and controls

419 lines (320 loc) · 10.8 KB

Compliance Automation Standards

This document outlines standards and best practices for automating compliance checks and security validations throughout the development lifecycle at Bayat. Following these standards ensures consistent, reliable, and efficient compliance management.

Purpose

Compliance automation aims to:

  1. Reduce Manual Effort: Minimize resource-intensive manual compliance checks
  2. Increase Consistency: Ensure consistent application of compliance requirements
  3. Improve Velocity: Enable rapid development while maintaining compliance
  4. Provide Evidence: Automatically generate compliance evidence and artifacts
  5. Enhance Visibility: Provide real-time compliance status visibility

Compliance as Code

Core Principles

Implement compliance as code using these principles:

  1. Declarative: Define compliance requirements as code
  2. Versioned: Version control compliance definitions
  3. Testable: Validate compliance requirements with automated tests
  4. Reusable: Create reusable compliance components
  5. Documented: Self-document compliance requirements in code

Implementation Approaches

Standardize implementation approaches:

  1. Policy as Code: Define policies in machine-readable formats
  2. Compliance Pipelines: Automate compliance checks in CI/CD
  3. Infrastructure as Code Validation: Validate IaC for compliance
  4. Runtime Monitoring: Continuously validate runtime compliance

Automated Compliance Checks

Continuous Compliance Pipelines

Implement continuous compliance pipelines:

  1. Pre-Commit Checks: Validate basic compliance before code is committed
  2. Pull Request Validation: Comprehensive compliance checks during review
  3. Build-Time Validation: Validate during CI/CD build process
  4. Pre-Deployment Checks: Validate before deployment to any environment
  5. Runtime Monitoring: Continuously monitor compliance in production

Standard Compliance Checks

Implement these standard automated checks:

  1. Security Controls:

    • Secret scanning
    • SAST (Static Application Security Testing)
    • SCA (Software Composition Analysis)
    • Container scanning
    • Infrastructure code scanning

  2. Configuration Validation:

    • Network configuration
    • Access controls
    • Encryption settings
    • Logging configuration

  3. Documentation Checks:

    • Required documentation presence
    • Documentation accuracy
    • Documentation freshness

Compliance Frameworks Integration

Framework Mapping

Map compliance controls to common frameworks:

  1. Industry Standards:

    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • ISO 27001
    • SOC 2
    • HIPAA
    • PCI DSS
    • GDPR

  2. Custom Frameworks:

    • Internal security standards
    • Client-specific requirements
    • Project-specific requirements

Control Mapping Example

Example of control mapping structure:

control:
  id: AC-01
  title: "Access Control Policy and Procedures"
  description: "The organization develops, documents, and disseminates..."
  frameworks:
    - framework: "NIST SP 800-53"
      control_id: "AC-1"
    - framework: "ISO 27001"
      control_id: "A.9.1.1"
    - framework: "SOC 2 (CC)"
      control_id: "CC6.1"
  implementation:
    - type: "Policy Document"
      location: "policies/access-control-policy.md"
    - type: "Automated Check"
      tool: "policy-scanner"
      rule_id: "AC-policy-validator"
      location: "compliance/rules/access-control.yml"

Tools and Technologies

Recommended Tooling

Standard tools for compliance automation:

  1. Policy Definition:

    • Open Policy Agent (OPA)
    • HashiCorp Sentinel
    • AWS Config Rules
    • Azure Policy

  2. Compliance Scanning:

    • Checkov
    • Terrascan
    • Prowler
    • Chef InSpec

  3. Continuous Validation:

    • Kyverno
    • Gatekeeper
    • Cloud Custodian
    • Falco

  4. Evidence Collection:

    • Compliance CLI tools
    • Attestation frameworks
    • Evidence collection agents

Tool Integration

Guidelines for tool integration:

  1. Centralized Configuration: Store configurations in central repository
  2. Consistent Outputs: Standardize tool outputs for unified reporting
  3. Pipeline Integration: Seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines
  4. Evidence Storage: Automated storage of compliance evidence

Implementation Examples

CI/CD Integration Example

Example of CI/CD pipeline integration:

# .github/workflows/compliance.yml
name: Compliance Checks

on:
  pull_request:
  push:
    branches: [main, develop]

jobs:
  compliance:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      
      - name: Secret scanning
        uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
        
      - name: SAST scan
        run: |
          semgrep ci --config=p/security-audit
          
      - name: Dependency scan
        uses: snyk/actions/node@master
        with:
          args: --severity-threshold=high
          
      - name: Infrastructure compliance
        run: |
          checkov -d terraform/ --framework=all
          
      - name: Policy validation
        run: |
          conftest test -p policies/ ./kubernetes/
          
      - name: Generate compliance report
        run: |
          compliance-reporter --output=compliance-report.json
          
      - name: Upload compliance artifacts
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        with:
          name: compliance-evidence
          path: compliance-report.json

Policy as Code Example

Example of OPA policy:

package kubernetes.admission

deny[msg] {
  input.request.kind.kind == "Pod"
  container := input.request.object.spec.containers[_]
  not container.securityContext.runAsNonRoot
  
  msg := sprintf(
    "Container %s must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot = true",
    [container.name]
  )
}

Evidence Collection and Reporting

Evidence Requirements

Standards for compliance evidence:

  1. Completeness: Capture all required evidence
  2. Immutability: Ensure evidence cannot be altered
  3. Traceability: Link evidence to specific requirements
  4. Consistency: Standardize evidence format and metadata

Automated Reporting

Requirements for automated reporting:

  1. Real-Time Dashboard: Current compliance status
  2. Trend Analysis: Compliance status over time
  3. Gap Analysis: Identification of compliance gaps
  4. Evidence Repository: Searchable repository of evidence

Report Structure

Standard compliance report structure:

{
  "report_id": "compliance-2023-06-15-123456",
  "timestamp": "2023-06-15T12:34:56Z",
  "project": "payment-service",
  "environment": "production",
  "overall_status": "compliant",
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "PCI DSS",
      "version": "3.2.1",
      "status": "compliant",
      "controls": [
        {
          "id": "PCI-DSS-1.1.2",
          "description": "Firewall configuration standards",
          "status": "compliant",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "type": "scan_result",
              "tool": "firewall-validator",
              "location": "s3://compliance-evidence/firewall-scan-1234.json",
              "timestamp": "2023-06-15T10:00:00Z"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Compliance Monitoring

Continuous Validation

Requirements for continuous validation:

  1. Runtime Checks: Continuously validate production environment
  2. Drift Detection: Identify deviations from compliant state
  3. Self-Healing: Implement corrective actions where possible
  4. Alert on Violations: Notify when compliance is broken

Monitoring Implementation

Example configuration for continuous monitoring:

# compliance-monitor.yml
monitors:
  - name: "S3 Bucket Policy Check"
    resource: "aws_s3_bucket"
    frequency: "1h"
    remediation: "auto"
    check:
      type: "AWS Config Rule"
      rule: "s3-bucket-public-write-prohibited"
    
  - name: "Kubernetes Pod Security"
    resource: "kubernetes_pod"
    frequency: "5m"
    remediation: "alert"
    check:
      type: "OPA Policy"
      policy: "pod-security-policy"
      
  - name: "Database Encryption"
    resource: "aws_rds_instance"
    frequency: "1d"
    remediation: "ticket"
    check:
      type: "Custom Script"
      script: "scripts/check-rds-encryption.sh"

Governance and Accountability

Roles and Responsibilities

Define roles for compliance automation:

  1. Compliance Engineering Team:

    • Develop and maintain compliance automation
    • Define compliance as code standards
    • Create reusable compliance components

  2. Development Teams:

    • Integrate compliance checks into pipelines
    • Resolve compliance violations
    • Contribute to compliance as code

  3. Security Team:

    • Define security requirements
    • Review compliance automation effectiveness
    • Audit compliance evidence

  4. Audit Team:

    • Verify compliance automation
    • Review evidence collection processes
    • Validate compliance reporting

Change Management

Standards for compliance change management:

  1. Versioning: Version control compliance policies
  2. Review Process: Peer review for compliance changes
  3. Testing: Test compliance rules before deployment
  4. Documentation: Document compliance policy changes
  5. Notification: Communicate changes to affected teams

Implementation Maturity Model

Compliance Automation Maturity Levels

Define maturity levels for implementation:

  1. Level 1: Initial

    • Ad-hoc compliance checks
    • Manual evidence collection
    • Reactive compliance management

  2. Level 2: Managed

    • Basic automated checks
    • Centralized evidence repository
    • Standardized compliance reporting

  3. Level 3: Defined

    • Comprehensive automated checks
    • Integrated with CI/CD pipelines
    • Compliance as code implemented

  4. Level 4: Measured

    • Continuous compliance monitoring
    • Compliance metrics and dashboards
    • Root cause analysis for violations

  5. Level 5: Optimizing

    • Predictive compliance management
    • Self-healing compliance systems
    • Continuous improvement process

Implementation Checklist

Use this checklist when implementing compliance automation:

  • Identify applicable compliance frameworks
  • Map compliance controls to automation opportunities
  • Select appropriate compliance automation tools
  • Develop compliance as code components
  • Integrate compliance checks into CI/CD pipelines
  • Implement evidence collection and reporting
  • Set up continuous compliance monitoring
  • Establish compliance governance process
  • Train teams on compliance automation
  • Measure and improve compliance automation effectiveness

Related Documents

  • \1\2)
  • \1\2)
  • \1\2)
  • \1\2#certificate-and-compliance-automation)
  • \1\2)