Skip to content

Add Pangea provider to Guardrails hook #10775

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ryanmeans
Copy link

Title

Add Pangea provider to Guardrails hook

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
  • I have added a screenshot of my new test passing locally
  • My PR passes all unit tests on make test-unit
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem

Type

🆕 New Feature

Changes

Adds Pangea AI Guard to guardail hooks

Supports prompt injection on both the request and response to the upstream LLM.

Test Screenshot

Screenshot 2025-05-12 at 4 12 45 PM

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 12, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 13, 2025 7:27pm

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 12, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@krrishdholakia
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ryanmeans thanks for this PR. Just confirming - were you able to verify this worked for you via manual qa as well?

@krrishdholakia
Copy link
Contributor

You should also probably add docs for this in here - https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/tree/5fbcd2260499d525d0e3f621cdc6dc8816412452/docs/my-website/docs/proxy/guardrails

And in the sidebar -

label: "[Beta] Guardrails",

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants