is it possible to add Flux w/loras and i2i?

[KINGLIFER]

xxxxxxxxxxx

[BetaDoggo]

Sure, here's an example workflow:

Make sure that you're using the newest version and that the dependencies are also all installed. The lora_url should be a direct download link (you can usually get this by right clicking the download button and selecting copy link). Also keep in mind that the required strength value varies a lot by the style of the image. Let me know if you have any issues.

[BetaDoggo]

@KINGLIFER I'm an idiot, I just realized that my image conversion code was also converting the image to greyscale. I copied it from a previous project but forgot to remove that part. This was also an issue in the vision model nodes. Thank you so much for helping me catch this. I've pushed the fix now so you'll have to update.

[BetaDoggo]

Yes it was fixed in aadf07b
When I set the strength to 0.01 I get a nearly identical image (it's stretched because of the set generation resolution)

What method are you using to update the extension?

[BetaDoggo]

Sorry I've been busy the last week. As far as a know the only cause of this would be that the version you have is out of date. You should try reinstalling the extension completely (deleting the folder) and trying this again. Otherwise I'm not sure if there's anything else I can do, I can't replicate this issue anymore on a clean install.

[BetaDoggo]

In the example above I set my strength to 0.01 and it produced an almost identical image to the input (stretched to match the generation resolution). Here are two with the regular image2image node:

[BetaDoggo]

@KINGLIFER Sorry for the late response, as far as I can tell i2i only works with a single image, you're probably thinking of ipadapter, controlnet or one of the other model extensions that has gotten flux support in the last few months. I don't really use this project anymore so it's a pretty low priority, but I'll see if I can throw together a node based on the flux-general and flux-general/image-to-image endpoints this weekend.

[BetaDoggo]

Oh ok yeah that shouldn't be too hard, I should be able to add that to the existing nodes. Rather than adding 4 outputs to the node I'll probably make another node to split the output so that it's an optional feature.

[BetaDoggo]

I've just pushed support for multiple image outputs. It outputs as comfyui's normal multi-image format and can be split by a new node (SplitImages) into up to 4 individual images. I've added it to the falfluxAPI, falfluxi2iAPI, and falfluxloraAPI nodes. I might add it to all of the other image output nodes later but I don't feel like retesting every single one right now, let me know if there's a specific node you want it on.

I didn't find the time to make a flux/general node this weekend and I'm not sure if I'll do it just based on the pricing of the images (13/$1). I might still make nodes based on the redux endpoints since they're still relatively affordable, but that would have to wait until next weekend.

[BetaDoggo]

@KINGLIFER You might be running an outdated version of comfy manager. Comfy Manager switched to using the official ComfyUI Registry not too long ago. The list that the older versions are using is outdated.

If you're running the newest version the search should look something like this:

You also need to select the specific 1.0.5 version or it will complain about security settings:

[KINGLIFER]

Please add this node... fal-ai/veo2/image-to-video
Love it. I was hoping you could add this one as well. I know you put a lot of work into these things for free so I am saying thank you.

[KINGLIFER]

:(

[BetaDoggo]

Sorry I was busy last week and couldn't get to this until now. I don't think I'm going to add veo support due to the cost. It's $2.50 per 5 seconds so it would be very expensive to test properly. I think Google's pricing is absurd since I believe they also offer a certain number of free generations through their own AIstudio platform.

[KINGLIFER]

I have no problem testing for you in needed. Or is there another img to video that's cheaper?

…

On Sun, Apr 27, 2025, 6:33 p.m. BetaDoggo ***@***.***> wrote: *BetaDoggo* left a comment (BetaDoggo/ComfyUI-Cloud-APIs#4) <#4 (comment)> Sorry I was busy last week and couldn't get to this until now. I don't think I'm going to add veo support due to the cost. It's $2.50 per 5 seconds so it would be very expensive to test properly. I think Google's pricing is absurd since I believe they also offer a certain number of free generations through their own AIstudio platform. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXS5XKY6H7KY774X66GUZJD23VLNNAVCNFSM6AAAAABNO7AEWWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQMZTGY3TCMZYHE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>