Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
186 lines (148 loc) · 6.8 KB

File metadata and controls

186 lines (148 loc) · 6.8 KB

Implementation Summary: End-to-End Keeper Chaos Testing

Issue #244: Add End-to-End Keeper Chaos Testing for Network and RPC Faults

Contributor Focus: [Resilience Testing] Validate how the backend behaves under realistic failure conditions
ETA: 2 days
Status: COMPLETED ✅

What Was Implemented

1. ChaosRpcServer (src/chaosRpcServer.js)

  • Extends the existing mock RPC server with fault injection capabilities
  • Supports multiple fault types:
    • Latency injection: Add delays to RPC responses
    • Failure injection: Return error responses
    • Partial failures: Some methods fail while others work
    • Rate limiting: Enforce request limits
    • Flaky behavior: Periodic availability
    • Gradual degradation: Increasing failure probability over time
  • Dynamic configuration updates
  • Comprehensive logging

2. ChaosTestHarness (src/chaosTestHarness.js)

  • Orchestrates chaos scenarios and collects observations
  • Predefined realistic failure scenarios:
    • Latency Spikes
    • Partial RPC Failure
    • Rate Limiting
    • Flaky Network
    • Gradual Degradation
    • Complete Outage
  • Automated evaluation against expected behaviors
  • Metrics collection and reporting
  • Recommendation generation based on test results

3. Chaos Test Suite (__tests__/chaos.test.js)

  • Integrated with existing Jest test framework
  • 7 comprehensive test cases:
    1. RPC latency spike handling
    2. Partial RPC failure handling
    3. Rate limiting and backoff behavior
    4. Circuit breaker tripping during outages
    5. Retry logic with error classification
    6. End-to-end chaos scenario suite
    7. Health reporting during chaos
  • Can be run standalone or as part of test suite

4. Command-Line Tool (scripts/chaos-test.js)

  • User-friendly interface for running chaos tests
  • Multiple output formats (console, JSON, markdown)
  • Scenario selection and filtering
  • Report generation and file export
  • Integration with npm scripts

5. Documentation (docs/CHAOS_TESTING.md)

  • Comprehensive guide to chaos testing
  • Scenario descriptions and expected behaviors
  • Usage examples and best practices
  • Troubleshooting guide
  • Integration instructions

6. Examples (examples/chaos-demo.js)

  • Interactive demonstration of chaos testing
  • Example scenarios and configurations
  • Programmatic usage patterns

7. Package Integration

  • Added npm scripts to package.json:
    • npm run chaos-test - Run all chaos scenarios
    • npm run chaos-test:list - List available scenarios
    • npm run chaos-test:single - Run single scenario
    • npm run test:chaos - Run chaos tests via Jest
  • Updated README with chaos testing section

Acceptance Criteria Met

✅ The backend can be tested under realistic degraded dependency conditions

  • Implemented: 6 realistic fault scenarios covering common production issues
  • Verified: Each scenario injects specific, measurable faults
  • Testable: Scenarios can be run individually or as a suite

✅ Recovery behavior is observable and repeatable

  • Implemented: Comprehensive metrics collection (requests, failures, latency, circuit state)
  • Observable: Real-time logging and health reporting
  • Repeatable: Deterministic fault injection with configurable probabilities

✅ The test setup teaches contributors about resilience expectations

  • Implemented: Detailed documentation with expected behaviors
  • Educational: Each scenario documents what should happen
  • Actionable: Recommendations generated from test results

✅ Findings can be turned into concrete follow-up work

  • Implemented: Automated recommendation generation
  • Prioritized: Recommendations categorized by severity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM)
  • Actionable: Specific actions suggested for each finding

Key Features

Realistic Fault Injection

  • Not just binary success/failure - includes partial failures, degradation, flakiness
  • Configurable probabilities and intensities
  • Time-based behaviors (gradual degradation, periodic flakiness)

Comprehensive Observability

  • Metrics collection at multiple levels (RPC, circuit breaker, retry logic)
  • Health state tracking during chaos
  • Detailed logs for debugging

Integration Ready

  • Works with existing Jest test framework
  • Compatible with current RPC wrapper and circuit breaker
  • Minimal dependencies on existing code

Practical and Maintainable

  • Configurable scenario durations (short for CI, longer for manual testing)
  • Easy to add new fault types or scenarios
  • Clear separation between test infrastructure and application code

Usage Examples

Running Tests

# Run all chaos scenarios
npm run chaos-test

# Run specific scenarios
npm run chaos-test -- --scenario=latency,ratelimit

# Run via Jest
npm test -- chaos.test.js

# Generate JSON report
npm run chaos-test -- --output=json --file=report.json

Programmatic Usage

const { ChaosTestHarness } = require('./src/chaosTestHarness');

async function testResilience() {
  const harness = new ChaosTestHarness();
  const results = await harness.runAllScenarios();
  
  console.log(`Passed ${results.summary.passedScenarios}/${results.summary.totalScenarios}`);
  
  if (results.summary.failedScenarios > 0) {
    const report = harness.generateReport(results);
    console.log('Recommendations:', report.recommendations);
  }
}

Files Created/Modified

New Files

  1. src/chaosRpcServer.js - Fault-injecting RPC server
  2. src/chaosTestHarness.js - Chaos test orchestration
  3. __tests__/chaos.test.js - Chaos test suite
  4. scripts/chaos-test.js - Command-line tool
  5. docs/CHAOS_TESTING.md - Comprehensive documentation
  6. examples/chaos-demo.js - Interactive demo
  7. IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY_CHAOS_TESTING.md - This summary

Modified Files

  1. package.json - Added chaos testing scripts
  2. README.md - Added chaos testing section to table of contents and documentation

Testing Coverage

The implementation provides:

  • Unit tests: Individual component testing
  • Integration tests: Component interaction testing
  • Scenario tests: Realistic failure pattern testing
  • End-to-end tests: Full system behavior under chaos

Next Steps for Contributors

  1. Run the chaos tests to establish baseline resilience
  2. Review recommendations from test reports
  3. Add new scenarios for specific failure modes encountered in production
  4. Integrate into CI/CD to catch resilience regressions
  5. Extend fault injection to cover new dependency types (resolvers, databases, etc.)

Conclusion

The chaos testing framework successfully addresses Issue #244 by providing a comprehensive, practical, and maintainable way to test keeper resilience under realistic failure conditions. The implementation meets all acceptance criteria and provides a solid foundation for ongoing resilience testing and improvement.