Open
Description
CASA Editorial 17 Nov
PRs to refine/move to close
- quick merge - accept injector protection CAIP as draft for now
- merge it!
- CAIP-10 + 19 update - last last call!
- merge it!
- session identifier CAIP - any objections to merging once a regexp/maximum length is in place and
token
generalized toidentifier
to generalize the semantics?- note: caips#170, which was a straw man for a universal session object across both architectures, will stay draft if not be closed altogether-- too soon, no point :D
- Ligi: Discussions-To should point to a GH discussion about 170 and 171 !
- Ritave opened one! :D CAIP-171 General Discussion CAIPs#176
- merge 173 close 171 leave 174 open!
- VC CAIP
Ongoing projects/topics
- lifecycle overhaul for web publishing
- should we get explicit about
review
qua time limit, as per EIP precedent? otherwise, how to timebox stages in lifecycle?- sergey: 6months since breaking change/changelog entry?
- retroactively apply to all open REVIEW CAIPs
- start using "14 day close" tag now that most workstreams are biweekly?
- start changelogging after status hits
draft
,review
, orfinal
?- add lifecycle section to CAIP-1 which mentions changelog practice
- should we get explicit about
- PRs not ready, still being flushed out
- CAIPs#162 - DagJWS - generalizing cap obj will make more ready?
- merge when zach says it's ready!
- CAIPs#167 - StreamSync - still feels v Ceramic-specific, how to generalize?
- merge when zach says it's ready!
- CAIPs#168 - IPLD timestamp proof - I still want my block height parameter for this to be bidirectional 🤣
- CAIPs#162 - DagJWS - generalizing cap obj will make more ready?
- CAIP-25 almost there?
- 3 version of CAIP-171: original flavor, wordsmithed and generalized but more explicit, and opinionated/constrained version extension of 173
- leaving 174 open lets syntax get hammered out later
- remaining nits for next RPC session (next week):
- error defs and assumptions around
accounts
- session management - may stay open until session objects get standardized?
- namespacing wallet methods
- snaps... OOB or namespaced?
- - juan hassan and olaf will talk before next RPC!
- extensions versus full flat versus idempotent caip-2 style - can prepare a PR for next meeting if it would help move things along
- error defs and assumptions around
- licensing minutae
- CC-0 license in CAIPs and Namespaces at repo-level?
- does it really matter at repo level?
- Olaf: so that we don't have to refer to CC website
- Olaf or Juan will add LICENSE file
- Juan will replace external links with internal links (and in CAIP and CAN templates!)
- Sergey: what about the j'ekyll code tho?
- Olaf: CC0 doesn't work for software ; dual-license CC0/mit0
- Community specification and CLA-bot per GH account for new UCAN interop repo?
- CC-0 license in CAIPs and Namespaces at repo-level?
- what the heck happened to CAIP-50? I'm getting pinged about it at multiformats and that seems urgent now becuz of IETF
Backlog
- fix hedera and hive namespaces (now legal post- #160)
- anyone heard from Jared at Auth0 lately? anything we can do to get that moving?
- olaf: i'll ping thread cuz snaps implementers have been asking about exactly this!
- all of namespaces 😞
Next Steps
- rocco will ping juan when namespaces#25 is gtg
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels