Rename ChainID to ?

[P1sar]

We really should start the discussion about renaming ChainID param in Chainbridge that conflicts with the EIP-155's ChainID and brings a lot of confusion. This param should be renamed in both Chainbridge and Solidity. I this thread is great start if anyone has any ideas!

[P1sar]

mu suggestions are: bridgeID or domainID

[GregTheGreek]

BridgeId sounds more explicit but I'm indifferent.

[GregTheGreek]

We may also look to the CAIP standards being led by members from walletconnect, metamask and others.

If it makes sense we should arguably even participate in the discussions with them.

[ansermino]

I personally like the term domainId. This seems very appropriate and flexible for multiple chains (or even potentially non-blockchain entities in the future) and for multiple deployments on a single chain.

(bridgeId I think would be too inflexible as it could be interpreted as defining a bridge, but really it's only defining a single point on a potentially multidirectional bridge)

[P1sar]

Ok, so we decide to use domainID instead of chainID for now