[Feature]: Add "Summary/Aggregation" Feature for Side-by-Side Model Comparisons

[mudssky]

Issue Checklist

• I understand that issues are for reporting problems and requesting features, not for off-topic comments, and I will provide as much detail as possible to help resolve the issue.
• I have checked the pinned issues and searched through the existing open issues, closed issues, and discussions and did not find a similar suggestion.
• I have provided a short and descriptive title so that developers can quickly understand the issue when browsing the issue list, rather than vague titles like "A suggestion" or "Stuck."
• The latest version of Cherry Studio does not include the feature I am suggesting.

Platform

Windows

Version

1.6.5

Is your feature request related to an existing issue?

The current side-by-side model comparison feature in Cherry Studio is excellent for visually differentiating responses from various models (like GPT-4, Claude, DeepSeek, etc.) to the same prompt.

However, when the number of models is large or the responses are lengthy, users are required to read through each response individually and mentally synthesize the key points. This process is time-consuming and prone to missing critical information or nuanced differences. An automated feature to summarize the core viewpoints from all model responses would significantly enhance information digestion and decision-making speed.

Desired Solution

Add a "Generate Summary" button above or below the panel containing the model responses.

Trigger: The user clicks this button to initiate a summarization process.

Process: The system uses the text from all current model responses as context and prompts a designated model, skilled in analysis and summarization (e.g., user-selectable or defaulting to a powerful model like GPT-4), to generate a summary.

Output: A structured summary is generated and displayed in a new panel. This summary should include:

Points of Consensus: The main ideas or answers where the models generally agree.

Points of Divergence: The key areas where the models' answers differ, contradict, or offer alternative viewpoints, briefly explaining the nature of the disagreement.

Key Takeaways: A distilled list of the most important and valuable information from all responses.

Unique Insights: Notable points, suggestions, or information provided by one or a few models that others did not mention.

Alternative Solutions

No response

Additional Information

No response

[EurFelux]

Note

This issue/comment/review was translated by Claude.

This feature request makes perfect sense, and I'll consider how to integrate it into the existing architecture starting from version 2.0.

---

Original Content

This feature request makes perfect sense, and I'll consider how to integrate it into the existing architecture starting from version 2.0.

[TianyuDu]

I'd love to see this feature!