Skip to content

RATY-357 stuck Dependabot workflows#305

Open
mikkojamG wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/RATY-357-stuck-dependabot-workflows
Open

RATY-357 stuck Dependabot workflows#305
mikkojamG wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/RATY-357-stuck-dependabot-workflows

Conversation

@mikkojamG

@mikkojamG mikkojamG commented Jul 6, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description ✨

Solves multiple dependencies that are currently breaking Dependabot update workflows.

Issues 🐛

Closes 🙅‍♀️

DEV-XXX:

Related 🤝

Testing ⚗️

Automated tests ⚙️️

Manual testing 👷‍♂️

Screenshots 📸

Additional notes 🗒️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project tooling requirements to a newer package manager version.
    • Refreshed several dependencies and workspace constraints to keep the project aligned with current versions and maintain consistency.

@mikkojamG mikkojamG requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2026 11:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@mikkojamG, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 53 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8fbdb440-3727-4da8-979a-2402be35e201

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2828852 and 80feac5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates package.json to bump the pnpm package manager/engine constraint to 11.9.0 and Sentry dependencies (@sentry/browser, @sentry/core, @sentry/nextjs) from ^10.56.0 to ^10.62.0. It also reformats YAML quoting in pnpm-workspace.yaml overrides and minimumReleaseAgeExclude without changing values.

Changes

Dependency and Workspace Configuration Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Package manager, engine, and Sentry version bumps
package.json		 Bumps packageManager/engines.pnpm to 11.9.0 and Sentry dependencies to ^10.62.0.
Workspace YAML quoting reformat
pnpm-workspace.yaml		 Reformats quoting in overrides and minimumReleaseAgeExclude entries while preserving the same packages and version ranges.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the main change: fixing Dependabot workflow issues tied to dependency bumps.
Description check ✅ Passed The description follows the template and covers the main change, though testing and issue details are mostly left as placeholders.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/RATY-357-stuck-dependabot-workflows

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LINKEDREGISTRATIONS-UI branch is deployed to platta: https://linkedregistrations-pr305-ui.dev.hel.ninja 🚀🚀🚀

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

e2e tests result is success for https://linkedregistrations-pr305-ui.dev.hel.ninja 😆🎉🎉🎉

@mikkojamG

mikkojamG commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Jul 6, 2026
View reviewed changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents 
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 5-8: The Dockerfile’s pinned pnpm version is out of sync with the
version declared in package.json. Update the Dockerfile’s pnpm install pin to
match the packageManager and engines.pnpm requirement of pnpm@11.9.0, using the
same container setup path that currently installs pnpm so the build stays
consistent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a8e6eb48-a445-4755-a60d-af7f6fec66d3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64489d7 and 2828852.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml

Comment thread package.json
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LINKEDREGISTRATIONS-UI branch is deployed to platta: https://linkedregistrations-pr305-ui.dev.hel.ninja 🚀🚀🚀

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

e2e tests result is success for https://linkedregistrations-pr305-ui.dev.hel.ninja 😆🎉🎉🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@mikkojamG