Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
So on the high level, do I get the idea correctly. Lets say there is a sub-component of a circuit ( I think the idea in general works, but there is a big caveat -- computing hashes in-circuit is really expensive (think at least 300 constraints per input for SNARK-friendly hashes). So if approximately We recently added a cheap way of computing a Pedersen commitment over variables in-circuit (see |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I also updated the pdf file and tried to fix it and explain the idea more clearly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi
I've written a short text about an idea for simplifying components that have a large circuit complexity. I'm not sure if I've explained it well and I don't know if my idea is anything useful. 😅
I'd be more than happy if you take a look and possibly give me some feedback:
https://github.com/aybehrouz/argennon/blob/main/pdf/Selected.pdf
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions