Skip to content

Commit 3248f88

Browse files
jeremymanninggithub-actions[bot]
authored andcommitted
Auto-solve daily LeetCode problem using GPT-5-mini
1 parent 69519e1 commit 3248f88

File tree

1 file changed

+45
-40
lines changed

1 file changed

+45
-40
lines changed

problems/2976/gpt5-mini.md

Lines changed: 45 additions & 40 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,18 +1,21 @@
11
# [Problem 2976: Minimum Cost to Convert String I](https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-cost-to-convert-string-i/description/?envType=daily-question)
22

33
## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness)
4-
We need to transform source -> target by repeatedly applying character substitutions that are allowed by given (original -> changed) operations with associated costs. Each operation changes a single character at some cost; operations can be chained (e.g., a -> c then c -> b). For a single position, the minimal cost to change letter x to y is just the shortest path cost from x to y in a directed weighted graph where nodes are letters and edges are given substitutions. Because substitutions are independent per character position, total cost is the sum of minimal per-position costs. If any required conversion is impossible (no path), answer is -1.
4+
We need to convert each character of source to the corresponding character in target. Each allowed operation is changing a single character x -> y at a given cost z if such an operation exists in the input arrays. Because we can apply operations any number of times and in any sequence, this is naturally a shortest-path problem on a directed graph of letters (26 nodes a..z). Each given (original[i] -> changed[i]) with cost[i] is a directed edge; repeated operations correspond to following a path.
55

6-
This suggests building a graph on 26 lowercase letters and computing shortest paths between all pairs; since alphabet size is small (26), Floyd-Warshall is appropriate and simple. Alternative: run Dijkstra from each source letter encountered, but Floyd-Warshall is easy and fast enough.
6+
So for each position where source[i] != target[i], we need the minimum path cost from source[i] to target[i] in that directed graph. If any required pair is unreachable, return -1. Sum the minimal costs over positions. Build a 26x26 distance matrix, initialize with +inf except zeros on diagonal, set direct edge costs to the minimum among duplicates, then run Floyd–Warshall (26^3 is tiny). Finally sum distances for each mismatch.
7+
8+
Potential pitfalls: directed edges (not undirected), multiple edges between same pair, large n so summation must be efficient, detect unreachable pairs.
79

810
## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts
9-
- Build a 26x26 distance matrix, initialize distances to INF, dist[i][i] = 0.
10-
- For each given original[i] -> changed[i] with cost[i], set dist[u][v] = min(dist[u][v], cost[i]) because multiple edges may be present.
11-
- Run Floyd-Warshall to get minimal costs between all letter pairs.
12-
- Iterate positions of source/target: if source[i] == target[i], cost 0; else if dist[src][tgt] is INF -> return -1; otherwise add dist[src][tgt].
13-
- Time complexity: O(26^3) for Floyd-Warshall (~17k operations) + O(n) to sum costs. Space O(26^2).
14-
- Use a sufficiently large INF (e.g., 10**18) to avoid overflow.
15-
- Edge cases: identical strings (return 0), unreachable conversions (return -1).
11+
Floyd–Warshall is simplest and safe: 26 nodes -> 26^3 ~ 17576 iterations. Alternatively could run Dijkstra from each source letter that appears in source where it differs from target — still cheap but more bookkeeping. Use Floyd–Warshall for clarity.
12+
13+
Edge cases:
14+
- If source[i] == target[i] cost is 0.
15+
- If there is no path from source[i] to target[i], answer is -1.
16+
- There may be multiple edges between same nodes; pick the smallest.
17+
- Costs can be up to 1e6 and n up to 1e5, so total sum can be large but fits Python int.
18+
Time complexity: O(26^3 + n) ~ O(1 + n) effectively; space O(26^2).
1619

1720
## Attempted solution(s)
1821
```python
@@ -21,54 +24,56 @@ from typing import List
2124
class Solution:
2225
def minimumCost(self, source: str, target: str, original: List[str], changed: List[str], cost: List[int]) -> int:
2326
n = len(source)
24-
# Quick length check (given by problem they are equal)
27+
# Quick length check (problem guarantees same length)
2528
if n != len(target):
2629
return -1
2730

28-
ALPH = 26
2931
INF = 10**18
30-
# dist[a][b] = minimum cost to convert letter a -> b
31-
dist = [[INF] * ALPH for _ in range(ALPH)]
32-
for i in range(ALPH):
32+
# 26 letters
33+
m = 26
34+
# dist[i][j] = min cost to convert chr(i+'a') -> chr(j+'a')
35+
dist = [[INF] * m for _ in range(m)]
36+
for i in range(m):
3337
dist[i][i] = 0
3438

35-
# Populate edges (take min if multiple edges between same pair)
36-
m = len(cost)
37-
for i in range(m):
38-
u = ord(original[i]) - ord('a')
39-
v = ord(changed[i]) - ord('a')
40-
if cost[i] < dist[u][v]:
41-
dist[u][v] = cost[i]
39+
# Populate direct edges (take min if multiple edges)
40+
for o, c, w in zip(original, changed, cost):
41+
u = ord(o) - ord('a')
42+
v = ord(c) - ord('a')
43+
if w < dist[u][v]:
44+
dist[u][v] = w
4245

43-
# Floyd-Warshall
44-
for k in range(ALPH):
46+
# Floyd-Warshall to get all-pairs shortest paths
47+
for k in range(m):
4548
dk = dist[k]
46-
for i in range(ALPH):
49+
for i in range(m):
4750
di = dist[i]
48-
# small micro-optimization: if di[k] is INF skip inner
51+
# minor micro-optimization: only proceed if di[k] not INF
4952
ik = di[k]
5053
if ik == INF:
5154
continue
5255
# iterate j
53-
# use local references
54-
for j in range(ALPH):
55-
# if dk[j] == INF skip
56-
val = ik + dk[j]
57-
if val < di[j]:
58-
di[j] = val
56+
# Use local variables for speed
57+
for j in range(m):
58+
nj = ik + dk[j]
59+
if nj < di[j]:
60+
di[j] = nj
5961

62+
# Sum up costs for each position
6063
total = 0
6164
for i in range(n):
62-
a = ord(source[i]) - ord('a')
63-
b = ord(target[i]) - ord('a')
64-
if a == b:
65+
s = source[i]
66+
t = target[i]
67+
if s == t:
6568
continue
66-
if dist[a][b] == INF:
69+
u = ord(s) - ord('a')
70+
v = ord(t) - ord('a')
71+
if dist[u][v] == INF:
6772
return -1
68-
total += dist[a][b]
73+
total += dist[u][v]
6974
return total
7075
```
71-
- Approach: Model characters as nodes in a directed weighted graph; compute all-pairs shortest paths with Floyd-Warshall; sum minimal per-position costs, returning -1 if any required conversion is unreachable.
72-
- Time complexity: O(26^3 + n) = O(n) for large n (26^3 is constant ≈ 17k ops).
73-
- Space complexity: O(26^2) = O(1) (constant).
74-
- Implementation notes: multiple given conversions between same pair are reduced by taking the minimum cost edge; self-conversions cost 0; INF is chosen large to avoid overflow.
76+
- Approach: Model characters as nodes of a directed weighted graph. Use Floyd–Warshall to compute the minimum conversion cost between any pair of letters, then sum costs for each differing position in source/target. If any required conversion is impossible, return -1.
77+
- Time complexity: O(26^3 + n) = O(n) effectively, since 26^3 is constant ~17.5k.
78+
- Space complexity: O(26^2) = O(1) constant.
79+
- Implementation details: Use INF large enough to avoid overflow; pick min when multiple direct edges exist; Floyd–Warshall triple loop with a small optimization skipping i when dist[i][k] is INF.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)