Skip to content

Implicit model in the understanding modelling of engines and modelets? #8

@chcorbato

Description

@chcorbato

I have the feeling the approach explained in D2.2 Undertanding candidate is using a conceptual model of:

modelet input(s) -> Engine -> modelet output

but it should be more explicit, and include the model the Engine uses:

                   ________
                   | model |
                       |
modelet input(s) -> Engine -> modelet output

Activity

alex-quin-gabriel

alex-quin-gabriel commented on May 1, 2025

@alex-quin-gabriel
Member

to my understanding 'modelet input(s)' is what we call 'model'.

chcorbato

chcorbato commented on May 1, 2025

@chcorbato
MemberAuthor

to my understanding 'modelet input(s)' is what we call 'model'.

I think should open a deep, long discussion @rsanz :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

      Participants

      @rsanz@chcorbato@alex-quin-gabriel

      Issue actions

        Implicit model in the understanding modelling of engines and modelets? · Issue #8 · CoreSenseEU/understanding-logic