Skip to content

[FEATURE] add a token bloat detector #45

@Aditya26189

Description

@Aditya26189

🧠 Feature: Token Bloat Detector

Problem

We’re losing 10–30% of LLM spend to silent token inefficiencies — verbose generations, over-sized context windows, retry storms, and model misuse (e.g. GPT-4 where GPT-3.5 would suffice).
Existing observability tools show token counts; they don’t explain waste or enforce prevention. CrashLens needs to detect, attribute, and enforce token efficiency as policy.

Goals

  • Identify and quantify “token bloat” across requests, routes, and models.
  • Attribute waste to specific prompt templates, model versions, or user flows.
  • Auto-suggest fixes and integrate with CI/CD or runtime policy enforcement.
  • Output audit-grade financial reports showing cost impact per % of bloat.

Detection Logic (initial heuristics)

  • Compare actual tokens used vs. expected tokens (based on prompt length, model efficiency benchmarks).

  • Flag overage thresholds:

    • 25% deviation = warning

    • 50% deviation = violation

  • Classify root causes:

    1. Prompt verbosity – unnecessary or repetitive phrasing.
    2. Context overreach – excessive retrieval/context size.
    3. Model misuse – high-cost model where smaller model suffices.
    4. Retry storms – repeated completions for same intent.

Output & Integration

  • CLI & API endpoints:

    • crashlens detect --bloat → outputs JSON report per route.
    • crashlens enforce --policy token_bloat.yaml → blocks CI/CD merges if threshold exceeded.
  • Dashboard view: cost leakage chart (% of spend wasted).

  • Optional webhook → send alerts to Slack or Grafana.

Example Policy

policies:
  - id: token_bloat_limit
    threshold: 25
    action: block
    message: "Token usage exceeds expected by >25%."

Metrics of Success

  • Detect 90%+ of token inefficiencies with <5% false positives.
  • Reduce token spend by 15–20% in pilot customers.
  • Median detection latency <2s for 1M+ log entries.

Open Questions

  1. Which model metadata (usage, retries, latency) is exposed per vendor?
  2. How do we baseline “expected token use” per model-family?
  3. Should detection run inline (real-time) or as nightly batch job?
  4. How do we integrate fixes with OPA policy layer seamlessly?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions