Skip to content

make keyword selection more flexible #67

@aappling-usgs

Description

@aappling-usgs

As noted in these comments 1, 2 (in the same thread), we've repeatedly come up against mild keyword pushback from the metadata validator, reviewers, and ScienceBase, including encouragement to use the USGS Keyword Thesaurus. See also #66 for an easily fixable sub-problem within this broader problem.

We may be able to simply update the FGDC metadata template to include expected keywords, but it might also be nice to add the flexibility for users to specify their own keywords more freely, along with more modern examples to help meet these external expectations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions