Edad_con_salud_outcome_vars.bib

@article{moms_consortium_1989,
	title = {The {Consortium} to {Establish} a {Registry} for {Alzheimer}'s {Disease} ({CERAD}). {Part} {I}. {Clinical} and neuropsychological assesment of {Alzheimer}'s disease},
	volume = {39},
	copyright = {© 1989 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.},
	issn = {0028-3878, 1526-632X},
	url = {https://n.neurology.org/content/39/9/1159},
	doi = {10.1212/WNL.39.9.1159},
	abstract = {The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) has developed brief, comprehensive, and reliable batteries of clinical and neuropsychological tests for assessment of patients with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We administered these batteries in a standardized manner to more than 350 subjects with a diagnosis of AD and 275 control subjects who were enrolled in a nationwide registry by a consortium of 16 university medical centers. The tests selected for this study measured the primary cognitive manifestations of AD across a range of severity of the disorder, and discriminated between normal subjects and those with mild and moderate dementia. The batteries also detected deterioration of language, memory, praxis, and general intellectual status in subjects returning for reassessment 1 year later. Interrater and testretest reliabilities were substantial. Long-term observations of this cohort are in progress in an effort to validate the clinical and neuropsychological assessments and to confirm the diagnosis by postmortem examinations. Although information on validation is limited thus far, the CERAD batteries appear to fill a need for a standardized, easily administered, and reliable instrument for evaluating persons with AD in multicenter research studies as well as in clinical practice.},
	language = {en},
	number = {9},
	urldate = {2021-06-07},
	journal = {Neurology},
	author = {Moms, J. C. and Heyman, A. and Mohs, R. C. and Hughes, J. P. and Belle, G. van and Fillenbaum, G. and Mellits, E. D. and Clark, C.},
	month = sep,
	year = {1989},
	pmid = {2771064},
	note = {Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology
Section: Articles},
	pages = {1159--1159},
}

@book{wechsler_wais-iii_1997,
	address = {San Antonio, TX},
	title = {{WAIS}-{III}  - {WMS}-{III}  technical  manual},
	abstract = {Measures an adult’s intellectual ability},
	language = {en-US},
	urldate = {2021-06-07},
	publisher = {The Psychological Corporation},
	author = {Wechsler, D.},
	year = {1997},
}

@techreport{he_shades_2012,
	title = {Shades of {Gray}: {A} {Cross}-{Country} {Study} of {Health} and {Well}-{Being} of the {Older} {Populations} in {SAGE} {Countries}, 2007–2010},
	language = {en},
	number = {P95/12-01},
	institution = {U.S. Census Bureau},
	author = {He, Wan and Muenchrath, Mark N and Kowal, Paul},
	month = may,
	year = {2012},
	pages = {76},
}

@article{bedard_zarit_2001,
	title = {The {Zarit} {Burden} {Interview}: {A} {New} {Short} {Version} and {Screening} {Version}},
	volume = {41},
	issn = {0016-9013},
	shorttitle = {The {Zarit} {Burden} {Interview}},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.652},
	doi = {10.1093/geront/41.5.652},
	abstract = {Purpose: The purpose of the study was to develop a short and a screening version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) that would be suitable across diagnostic groups of cognitively impaired older adults, and that could be used for cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies. Design and Methods: We used data from 413 caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults referred to a memory clinic. We collected information on caregiver burden with the 22-item ZBI, and information about dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and the frequency of problem behaviors among care recipients. We used factor analysis and item–total correlations to reduce the number of items while taking into consideration diagnosis and change scores. Results: We produced a 12-item version (short) and a 4-item version (screening) of the ZBI. Correlations between the short and the full version ranged from 0.92 to 0.97, and from 0.83 to 0.93 for the screening version. Correlations between the three versions and ADL and problem behaviors were similar. We further investigated the behavior of the short version with a two-way analysis of variance and found that it produced identical results to the full version. Implications: The short and screening versions of the ZBI produced results comparable to those of the full version. Reducing the number of items did not affect the properties of the ZBI, and it may lead to easier administration of the instrument.},
	number = {5},
	urldate = {2021-03-17},
	journal = {The Gerontologist},
	author = {Bédard, Michel and Molloy, D. William and Squire, Larry and Dubois, Sacha and Lever, Judith A. and O'Donnell, Martin},
	month = oct,
	year = {2001},
	pages = {652--657},
}

@techreport{world_health_organization_global_2012,
	address = {20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland},
	title = {Global {Physical} {Activity} {Questionnaire}  ({GPAQ}) {Analysis} {Guide}},
	shorttitle = {{QPAQ}},
	url = {https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/resources/GPAQ_Analysis_Guide.pdf},
	language = {Inglés},
	urldate = {2021-05-17},
	institution = {World Health Organization, Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Department},
	author = {{World Health Organization}},
	year = {2012},
	note = {20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland},
	pages = {23},
}

@article{stern_what_2002,
	title = {What is cognitive reserve? {Theory} and research application of the reserve concept},
	volume = {8},
	issn = {1469-7661, 1355-6177},
	shorttitle = {What is cognitive reserve?},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-neuropsychological-society/article/abs/what-is-cognitive-reserve-theory-and-research-application-of-the-reserve-concept/B6524DF8FC814A462004141F7B19BCF4},
	doi = {10.1017/S1355617702813248},
	abstract = {The idea of reserve against brain damage stems from the repeated 
observation that there does not appear to be a direct relationship 
between the degree of brain pathology or brain damage and the 
clinical manifestation of that damage. This paper attempts to 
develop a coherent theoretical account of reserve. One convenient 
subdivision of reserve models revolves around whether they envision 
reserve as a passive process, such as in brain reserve or 
threshold, or see the brain as actively attempting to cope with 
or compensate for pathology, as in cognitive reserve. Cognitive 
reserve may be based on more efficient utilization of brain 
networks or of enhanced ability to recruit alternate brain networks 
as needed. A distinction is suggested between reserve, the ability 
to optimize or maximize normal performance, and compensation, 
an attempt to maximize performance in the face of brain damage 
by using brain structures or networks not engaged when the brain 
is not damaged. Epidemiologic and imaging data that help to 
develop and support the concept of reserve are presented. 
(JINS, 2002, 8, 448–460.)},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2021-07-27},
	journal = {Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society},
	author = {Stern, Yaakov},
	month = mar,
	year = {2002},
	note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},
	keywords = {Epidemiology, Alzheimer's disease, Brain damage, Compensation, Functional imaging},
	pages = {448--460},
}

@article{rami_gonzalez_cuestionario_2011,
	title = {Cuestionario de reserva cognitiva. {Valores} obtenidos en población anciana sana y con enfermedad de {Alzheimer}},
	volume = {52},
	issn = {0210-0010},
	url = {https://www.neurologia.com/articulo/2010478},
	doi = {10.33588/rn.5204.2010478},
	language = {es},
	number = {04},
	urldate = {2020-07-16},
	journal = {Revista de Neurología},
	author = {Rami González, Lorena and Valls Pedret, Cinta and Bartrés Faz, David and Caprile Elola-Olaso, Claudia and Solé Padullés, Cristina and Castellví Sampol, Magdalena and Olives Cladera, Jaume and Bosch Capdevila, Beatriz and Molinuevo Guix, José Luis},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Cognitive reserve},
	pages = {195},
}

@article{chalmers_mirt_2012,
	title = {mirt: {A} multidimensional item response theory package for the {R} environment},
	volume = {48},
	copyright = {Copyright (c) 2011 R. Philip Chalmers},
	issn = {1548-7660},
	shorttitle = {mirt},
	url = {http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i06/},
	doi = {10.18637/jss.v048.i06},
	language = {en},
	number = {6},
	urldate = {2018-07-05},
	journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
	author = {Chalmers, R. Philip},
	month = may,
	year = {2012},
	note = {Number: 1},
}

@article{wilson_improving_2006,
	title = {Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach},
	volume = {21},
	issn = {0268-1153, 1465-3648},
	shorttitle = {Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling},
	url = {https://academic.oup.com/her/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/her/cyl053},
	doi = {10.1093/her/cyl053},
	language = {en},
	number = {Supplement 1},
	urldate = {2021-04-15},
	journal = {Health Education Research},
	author = {Wilson, M. and Allen, D. D. and Li, J. C.},
	month = oct,
	year = {2006},
	pages = {i19--i32},
}

@book{murray_health_2003,
	address = {Geneva},
	title = {Health {Systems} {Performance} {Assessment}: {Debates}, {Methods} and {Empiricism}},
	isbn = {978-92-4-156245-4},
	shorttitle = {Health {Systems} {Performance} {Assessment}},
	abstract = {This volume reports on a large body of work led by the World Health Organization that is intended to strengthen the foundations for evidence-based policies aimed at health systems development. This has included work to develop a common conceptual framework for health systems performance assessment, to encourage the development of tools to measure its components, and to collaborate with countries in applying these tools to measure and then to improve health systems performance. It began with the enunciation of a framework that specified a parsimonious set of key goals to which health systems contribute, and the first set of figures on goal attainment and health system efficiency in countries that were Members of the Organization was published in The World Health Report 2000.  This book provides a uniquely comprehensive exploration of many different facets of health systems performance assessment. It will be relevant for researchers, students and decision-makers seeking a more detailed understanding of concepts, methods and the latest empirical findings. While most authors in this volume take a global perspective, the findings have important implications for the development of national performance frameworks and the creation of a culture of accountability.},
	language = {en},
	publisher = {World Health Organization},
	author = {Murray, Christopher J. L. and Evans, David B. and {Organisation mondiale de la santé}},
	month = nov,
	year = {2003},
	keywords = {Health \& Fitness / General, Health \& Fitness / Health Care Issues, Law / Health, Political Science / Public Policy / Social Services \& Welfare},
}

@incollection{salomon_quantifying_2003,
	address = {Geneva},
	title = {Quantifying {Individual} {Levels} of {Health}:  {Definitions}, {Concepts}, and {Measurement}  {Issues}},
	isbn = {978-92-4-156245-4},
	url = {https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.644.6014&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=336},
	language = {EN},
	booktitle = {Health {Systems} {Performance} {Assessment}: {Debates}, {Methods} and {Empiricism}},
	publisher = {World Health Organization},
	author = {Salomon, Joshua A. and Mathers, Colin D. and Chatterji, Somnath and Sadana, Ritu and Üstün, T. Bedirhan and Murray, Christopher J. L.},
	editor = {Murray, Christopher J. L. and Evans, David B.},
	month = nov,
	year = {2003},
	pages = {301--318},
}

@article{brugha_list_1990,
	title = {The {List} of {Threatening} {Experiences}: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire},
	volume = {82},
	issn = {1600-0447},
	shorttitle = {The {List} of {Threatening} {Experiences}},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.x},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.x},
	abstract = {During the 23 years since the original work of Holmes \& Rahe, research into stressful life events on human subjects has tended towards the development of longer and more complex inventories. The List of Threatening Experiences (LTE) of Brugha et al., by virtue of its brevity, overcomes difficulties of clinical application. In a study of 50 psychiatric patients and informants, the questionnaire version of the list (LTE-Q) was shown to have high test-retest reliability, and good agreement with informant information. Concurrent validity, based on the criterion of independently rated adversity derived from a semistructured life events interview, making use of the Life Events and Difficulties Scales (LEDS) method developed by Brown \& Harris, showed both high specificity and sensitivity. The LTE-Q is particularly recommended for use in psychiatric, psychological and social studies in which other intervening variables such as social support, coping, and cognitive variables are of interest, and resources do not allow for the use of extensive interview measures of stress.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2020-07-10},
	journal = {Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica},
	author = {Brugha, T. S. and Cragg, D.},
	year = {1990},
	note = {\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.x},
	keywords = {validity, life event, questionnaire, reliability},
	pages = {77--81},
}

@article{garcia-nieto_protocolo_2012,
	title = {Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio: fiabilidad interexaminadores},
	volume = {5},
	issn = {1888-9891},
	shorttitle = {Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989111001479},
	doi = {10.1016/j.rpsm.2011.10.001},
	abstract = {Resumen
Introducción
El acuerdo entre-examinadores es un aspecto fundamental en la planificación de cualquier trabajo de investigación donde la principal herramienta diagnóstica es la entrevista clínica. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar el acuerdo entre-examinadores de un instrumento de evaluación de la conducta suicida (Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio) utilizando las valoraciones de múltiples observadores en una sola sesión.
Método
Durante la fase piloto de un estudio clínico multicéntrico centrado en la monitorización de intentos de suicidio, 32 examinadores evaluaron el vídeo de la entrevista clínica a un paciente simulado con conducta suicida. Para identificar los ítems en los que existía una mayor discordancia y a los examinadores cuyo criterio se alejaba más del acuerdo general, se utilizó el método Detection Of Multiple Examiners Not In Consensus (DOMENIC).
Resultado
El acuerdo interexaminadores osciló entre pobre ({\textless}70\%) y excelente (90-100\%). En la escala de acontecimientos vitales estresantes el nivel de acuerdo osciló entre 48,4 y 97\%; en la escala problemas psicosociales del DSM-IV, entre 75,5 y 100\%; en la escala de evaluación de la actividad global fue de 82,58\%; en la escala de intencionalidad suicida, osciló entre 67,5 y 97\%; en la escala de ideación suicida, entre 63,5 y 100\% y en la escala de letalidad del intento de suicidio fue de 88,39\%. En general, los examinadores mostraron un nivel de acuerdo adecuado tanto en las puntuaciones globales de cada escala como en cada ítem en particular.
Conclusiones
El diseño propuesto permite evaluar el acuerdo entre-examinadores de una forma eficiente (en una única sesión). Además, con respecto al Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio, el acuerdo entre-examinadores fue apropiado.
Introduction
Inter-rater agreement is a crucial aspect in the planning and performance of a clinical trial in which the main assessment tool is the clinical interview. The main objectives of this study are to study the inter-rater agreement of a tool for the assessment of suicidal behavior (Brief Suicide Questionnaire) and to examine whether the inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject is an efficient method to assess the reliability of an instrument.
Method
In the context of designing a multicenter clinical trial, 32 psychiatrists assessed a videotaped clinical interview of a patient with suicidal behavior. In order to identify those items in which a greater level of discordance existed and detect the examiners whose ratings differed significantly from the average ratings, we used the DOMENIC method (Detecion of Multiple Examiners Not in Consensus).
Results
Inter-rater agreement was between poor ({\textless}70\%) to excelent (90-100\%. Inter-rater agreement in Brugha's list of threatening experiences ranged from 75.5 and 100\%; in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale was 82.58\%; in the Beck's Suicidal Intent Scale, ranged from 67.5 and 97\%; in the Beck's Scale for Suicide Ideation, ranged from 63.5 and 100\%; and in the Lethality Rating Scale was 88.39\%. On the whole, the level of agreement among raters, both in general scores and in particular items, was appropriate.
Conclusion
The proposed design allows the assessment of the inter-rater agreement in an efficient way (only in one session). In addition, regarding the Brief Suicide Questionnaire, inter-raters agreement was appropriate.},
	language = {es},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2020-07-10},
	journal = {Revista de Psiquiatría  y Salud Mental},
	author = {García-Nieto, Rebeca and Parra Uribe, Isabel and Palao, Diego and Lopez-Castroman, Jorge and Sáiz, Pilar Alejandra and García-Portilla, María Paz and Saiz Ruiz, Jerónimo and Ibañez, Angela and Tiana, Thais and Durán Sindreu, Santiago and Perez Sola, Victor and de Diego-Otero, Yolanda and Pérez-Costillas, Lucia and Fernández García-Andrade, Rafael and Saiz-González, Dolores and Jiménez Arriero, Miguel Angel and Navío Acosta, Mercedes and Giner, Lucas and Guija, Julio Antonio and Escobar, José Luis and Cervilla, Jorge Antonio and Quesada, Marta and Braquehais, Dolores and Blasco-Fontecilla, Hilario and Legido-Gil, Teresa and Aroca, Fuensanta and Baca-García, Enrique},
	month = jan,
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {Psychometrics, Statistics, Psicometría, Estadística, Acuerdo entre-examinadores, Clinical rating scales, Clinical trials, Ensayos clínicos, Escalas clínicas, Intentos de suicidio, Inter-rater agreement, Suicide, Suicide attempt, Suicidio},
	pages = {24--36},
}

@book{benedet_evaluacion_2013,
	address = {Madrid},
	series = {Instrumentos de evaluación neuropsicológica 1},
	title = {Evaluación de las alteraciones de la memoria, de la flexibilidad mental, de las gnosias espaciales: {TEMEDI}, {Test} de {Memoria} {Discursiva}, {TMT}, {Test} de {Trazado} de un {Camino}, {BPB}, {Batería} {Pariental} de {Boston}},
	isbn = {978-84-7869-915-5},
	shorttitle = {Evaluación de las alteraciones de la memoria, de la flexibilidad mental, de las gnosias espaciales},
	abstract = {Contiene: manual (149 p.), cuadernillo de registro y aplicación (39 p.)},
	language = {spa},
	publisher = {CEPE},
	author = {Benedet, María Jesús},
	year = {2013},
	keywords = {Neuropsicología; Psicología de la salud},
}

@techreport{world_health_organization_icd-10_1992,
	title = {The {ICD}-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders : clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines},
	shorttitle = {The {ICD}-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders},
	url = {https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37958},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-10-11},
	institution = {World Health Organization},
	author = {{World Health Organization}},
	year = {1992},
	note = {ISBN: 9787117019576
number-of-pages: 362},
}

@book{worldhealthorganization2019,
	title = {International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (11th ed.)},
	author = {World Health Organization, },
	year = {2019},
	date = {2019},
	edition = {11},
	url = {https://icd.who.int/}
}