Skip to content

[release] Update last stable to 7.82.1 - #54653

Open
temporal-github-worker-1[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
7.82.1/update-last-stable-019feb17-b861-7088-ab08-ea1cadfa8c82_232
Open

[release] Update last stable to 7.82.1#54653
temporal-github-worker-1[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
7.82.1/update-last-stable-019feb17-b861-7088-ab08-ea1cadfa8c82_232

Conversation

@temporal-github-worker-1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@temporal-github-worker-1
temporal-github-worker-1 Bot requested review from a team as code owners August 10, 2026 15:43
@temporal-github-worker-1 temporal-github-worker-1 Bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-delivery labels Aug 10, 2026
@AliDatadog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-10 15:43:50 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-10 15:43:56 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

  • Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
  • Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-10 20:30:28 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-build labels Aug 10, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Aug 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 5fcb9f95:

Results for datadog-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.226.b02384a.pipeline.131268996-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.226.b02384a.pipeline.131268996-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 5fcb9f9
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

33 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 760.218 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 713.079 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 312.557 MiB
agent_msi 644.203 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 760.201 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 713.062 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 735.966 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 692.153 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 760.201 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 713.062 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 735.966 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 692.153 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 818.833 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 819.642 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1009.731 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 999.192 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 210.475 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 223.456 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.439 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.482 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.560 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 305.814 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 317.125 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.224 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.247 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.224 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.224 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 46.475 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 43.127 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.910 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 46.476 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 46.475 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: afe47c55-83f6-4ea0-8821-5a4a4e169c02

Baseline: fec92d8
Comparison: b02384a
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.99 [+0.74, +1.24] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization +0.08 [-0.06, +0.22] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.01 [-0.04, +0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization -0.07 [-0.17, +0.03] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory utilization -0.07 [-0.19, +0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.08 [-0.20, +0.04] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization -0.15 [-0.23, -0.08] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.03 [-1.89, -0.18] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 4 = 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 171.54MiB ≤ 178MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 745.25KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 4 = 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 518.89MiB ≤ 538MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.14MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 18 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 207.11MiB ≤ 229MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.23MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 362.51 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 18 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 422.36MiB ≤ 439MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory_usage 10/10 71.45MiB ≤ 76MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 26.58 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 322.01MiB ≤ 335MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 60.80 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 301.55MiB ≤ 314MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 20.32 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 307.86MiB ≤ 343MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@rdesgroppes

rdesgroppes commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I've reported the failing dd-gitlab/Service catalog metadata validation.

Tentative fix: #54910.

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Set `parent_environments` to `["staging"]` on the `stable-nightly-build` and `main-nightly-build` targets of the `datadog-agent-nightly` conductor.

This does not address why a check advertised as not mandatory fails the merge queue, which `#sre-core-observability` is investigating.

### Motivation
The `validate-service-metadata` job went red and [puzzled its readers](https://dd.slack.com/archives/C06PBHLD4DQ/p1786712886965919), while [blocking the merge](https://dd.slack.com/archives/C0701E5KYSX/p1786719308338409) of #54653.

Asked for advice, its owners confirmed the check is not mandatory, which seems to hold for the `Merge` button but not for the merge queue, and [recommended fixing the file meanwhile](https://dd.slack.com/archives/C03BZTDFUKY/p1786722568536699).

The failure code is [`conductor_no_parent_environments`](gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1952249035).

### Describe how you validated your changes
Relying on CI: the validator runs as an Atlas workflow, and its offline counterpart lives in `dd-source`.

### Additional Notes
Being unaware of what the nightly targets feed, I picked "staging" to mirror the sibling `build_only` target `beta-build-publish-image`, out of `prod`, `staging`, `gov` and `dr`, so **owners should confirm**.

Co-authored-by: regis.desgroppes <regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com>
@AliDatadog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-17 10:18:53 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-17 10:19:05 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

  • Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
  • Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-17 10:19:47 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

ali.benabdallah@datadoghq.com unqueued this merge request

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed flow-maintained internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-build team/agent-delivery team/agent-devx team/agent-integrations

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants