Skip to content

Update module github.com/godror/godror to v0.51.0 - #53235

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-godror-godror-0.x
Open

Update module github.com/godror/godror to v0.51.0#53235
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-godror-godror-0.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
github.com/godror/godror v0.50.0v0.51.0 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

godror/godror (github.com/godror/godror)

v0.51.0

Compare Source

Changed
  • Use ODPI-C v6.0.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Paris)

  • Branch creation
    • At 12:00 AM through 04:59 AM and 10:00 PM through 11:59 PM, Monday through Friday (* 0-4,22-23 * * 1-5)
    • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Jul 6, 2026
@dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c

dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PRApprover will approve and merge this PR, FAQ, #dx-source-code-management

🛠️ PRApproval Status

  • ✅ PR is eligible for auto-approval by rule datadog-agent-renovate - 2026-07-16T21:02:04Z
  • ⬜ CI tests passed
  • ⬜ Approved
  • Manual merge required: this rule does not auto-merge.

➡️ Current phase: CI tests failed. Please fix the failing tests to continue.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Jul 6, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jul 6, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 53c1200b43

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread go.mod
github.com/gocomply/scap v0.1.3
github.com/godbus/dbus/v5 v5.2.2
github.com/godror/godror v0.50.0
github.com/godror/godror v0.51.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Avoid dropping pre-19c Oracle Client support

This bump pulls godror v0.51.0, whose changelog says it uses ODPI-C v6.0.0; ODPI-C 6.0 drops support for Oracle Client libraries before 19c. The Agent routes all tns_alias configs and any oracle_client: true/instant_client config through godror (pkg/collector/corechecks/oracle/connection_handling.go:34-40), while the config example still allows those external-client modes without a 19c minimum (cmd/agent/dist/conf.d/oracle.d/conf.yaml.example:56-96). Existing deployments pinned to Instant Client/Oracle Home 11g/12c/18c will start failing at connect/ping after this dependency-only update, so either keep godror on an ODPI 5.x release or make this a coordinated support/docs/migration change.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verified this against primary sources:

ODPI-C's own release notes (https://odpi-c.readthedocs.io/en/latest/releasenotes.html) confirm the claim — the 6.0.0 entry states verbatim: "Dropped support for Oracle Client libraries before 19c."

Datadog's Database Monitoring docs (https://docs.datadoghq.com/database_monitoring/setup_oracle/selfhosted/) currently list 11g, 12c, 18c, 19c, and 21c as supported Oracle Database versions for self-hosted setups — so this bump does conflict with our documented support matrix, not just a theoretical edge case.

That said, per Oracle's own Lifetime Support Policy (https://endoflife.date/oracle-database), those older releases are already end-of-life on Oracle's side:

Release Extended Support Ended Status
11g R1 Aug 31, 2015 EOL
11g R2 Dec 31, 2020 EOL
12c R1 Jul 31, 2022 EOL
12c R2 never had Extended Support (Innovation Release) EOL
18c never had Extended Support (Innovation Release) EOL
19c Active through Dec 31, 2032

So this is a real, documented support-matrix conflict rather than a false positive — but it's also arguable that Datadog should formally deprecate pre-19c Oracle Client support given those DB versions are already unsupported upstream. Either way, this needs a deliberate decision, not a silent side effect of a routine dependency bump. Looping in @DataDog/database-monitoring (CODEOWNERS for pkg/collector/corechecks/oracle) to weigh in before this merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for looping us in @rdesgroppes! Let me follow up with the team with a path forward here.

@datadog-official

datadog-official Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 51.89% (+0.12%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 1b8eacb | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 61719b2b:

Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.148.1b8eacb.pipeline.124948550-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 61719b2
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.05% of buffer) 750.987 → 750.991 → 758.200
agent_deb_amd64_fips +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.20% of buffer) 705.884 → 705.892 → 709.840
agent_rpm_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.05% of buffer) 750.971 → 750.975 → 758.170
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.20% of buffer) 705.868 → 705.876 → 709.840
agent_rpm_arm64 +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.22% of buffer) 726.055 → 726.063 → 729.660
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.18% of buffer) 684.633 → 684.641 → 688.860
agent_suse_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.05% of buffer) 750.971 → 750.975 → 758.170
agent_suse_amd64_fips +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.20% of buffer) 705.868 → 705.876 → 709.840
agent_suse_arm64 +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.22% of buffer) 726.055 → 726.063 → 729.660
agent_suse_arm64_fips +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.18% of buffer) 684.633 → 684.641 → 688.860
docker_agent_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.10% of buffer) 809.694 → 809.698 → 813.790
docker_agent_arm64 +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.15% of buffer) 809.782 → 809.790 → 815.030
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.10% of buffer) 1000.591 → 1000.595 → 1004.550
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 +8.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.15% of buffer) 989.332 → 989.340 → 994.710
18 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_heroku_amd64 307.705 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 209.881 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.952 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.216 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.367 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 303.100 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 314.592 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.951 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 27.994 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.951 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.951 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 46.194 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.882 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.647 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 46.195 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 46.194 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 4b0a5239-4394-4130-9dd5-147f835a0050

Baseline: 61719b2
Comparison: 1b8eacb
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.64 [-0.31, +1.59] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.40 [+0.15, +0.65] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.29 [+0.24, +0.33] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization +0.17 [+0.11, +0.23] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization +0.11 [+0.02, +0.20] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization -0.02 [-0.06, +0.01] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.25 [-0.34, -0.16] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 146.23MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 732.16KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 9/10 499.63MiB > 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 181.68MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.15MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 362.88 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 388.81MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 29.62 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 301.38MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 63.88 ≤ 80 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 276.32MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 21.55 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 289.63MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load comparison 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has been automatically approved by the DD PR Approver bot.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-06 08:00:26 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-06 08:00:31 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 4h (p90).


2026-07-06 08:03:29 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Retrying because an high priority merge request needed to be processed first. No action is needed from your side.


2026-07-06 08:04:00 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request build was cancelled

regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com cancelled this merge request build

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-godror-godror-0.x branch 5 times, most recently from c89a8d5 to 83bd448 Compare July 8, 2026 20:12
@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes added the stop-updating Prevent auto updates from Renovate label Jul 8, 2026
renovate Bot and others added 2 commits July 16, 2026 09:51
This commit was created from the local commit with hash edd45594a8d8708da06e68dfccb05deb6d7fde6d.
@rdesgroppes
rdesgroppes force-pushed the renovate/github.com-godror-godror-0.x branch from 9305b12 to 1b8eacb Compare July 16, 2026 08:41
rdesgroppes
rdesgroppes previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-16 08:43:08 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-16 08:43:15 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-07-16 09:55:02 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com unqueued this merge request

@rdesgroppes
rdesgroppes dismissed their stale review July 16, 2026 09:58

not my call to make

@rdesgroppes
rdesgroppes requested a review from a team July 16, 2026 09:59
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-16 11:58:57 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-16 11:59:02 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 3h (p90).


2026-07-16 12:00:05 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request build was cancelled

regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com cancelled this merge request build

@github-actions github-actions Bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Jul 16, 2026
@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes added team/database-monitoring ask-review Ask in slack required teams to review this PR and removed changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed labels Jul 16, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-16 14:57:39 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-16 14:57:48 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-07-16 14:59:10 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

regis.desgroppes@datadoghq.com unqueued this merge request

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the past 15 days.

It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this pull request is still relevant, adding a comment or pushing new commits will keep it open. Also, you can always reopen the pull request if you missed the window.

Thank you for your contributions!

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the stale label Aug 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask in slack required teams to review this PR dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation stale stop-updating Prevent auto updates from Renovate team/database-monitoring

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants