Correct a typo.

This affected whether we checked with the user if a plan was not
comprehensive for all images.

Author: manthey

imagedephi/main.py

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
         "--profile",
         type=click.Choice([choice.value for choice in ProfileChoice], case_sensitive=False),
         help="Select a redaction profile. This determines the base rule set used for a run of the"
-        " program.\n\nThe 'strict' profile currently only supports tiff and svs files, and will "
+        " program.\n\nThe 'strict' profile currently only supports tiff and svs files, and will"
         " keep only metadata necessary to conform to the tiff standard.\n\nThe 'dates' profile will"
         " fuzz dates and times by setting to January 1st or midnight.\n\nThe 'default' profile uses"
         " our standard base rules, and is the default profile used.",

imagedephi/redact/redact.py

@@ -391,10 +391,11 @@ def show_redaction_plan(
         logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
 
     global tags_used
+    global missing_rules
+    missing_rules = False
 
     def _create_redaction_plan_report():
         global missing_rules
-        missing_rules = False
         global unprocessable_image_messages
         unprocessable_image_messages = []
         with logging_redirect_tqdm(loggers=[logger]):
@@ -422,8 +423,8 @@ def _create_redaction_plan_report():
                     continue
                 logger.info(f"Redaction plan for {image_path.name}:")
                 redaction_plan_report.update(redaction_plan.report_plan())  # type: ignore
-            if not redaction_plan.is_comprehensive():
-                missing_rules = True
+                if not redaction_plan.is_comprehensive():
+                    missing_rules = True
 
     if not update:
         global redaction_plan_report