Skip to content

Commit c0a0839

Browse files
github-actions[bot]github-actions[bot]
authored
Merge pull request #281 from DiogoRibeiro7/feat/reserve_branche
chore: new article
2 parents a9310a2 + 0d1471a commit c0a0839

6 files changed

+1091
-9
lines changed

‎_posts/-_ideas/2030-01-01-data_model_drift.md‎

Lines changed: 0 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,11 +13,6 @@ tags: []
1313

1414
## Article Ideas on Data Drift and Model Drift
1515

16-
17-
### 5. **Model Retraining Strategies to Handle Data Drift**
18-
- **Overview**: Provide strategies for handling data drift through **incremental learning**, **active learning**, or **periodic retraining**.
19-
- **Focus**: Pros and cons of different retraining approaches, and how to avoid overfitting or underfitting when adapting models to new data distributions.
20-
2116
### 6. **Data Drift vs. Concept Drift: Understanding the Differences and Implications**
2217
- **Overview**: Differentiate between **data drift** (changes in the input data distribution) and **concept drift** (changes in the underlying relationships between inputs and outputs).
2318
- **Focus**: Provide real-world examples to illustrate how each type of drift affects model performance and decision-making.

‎_posts/-_ideas/2030-01-01-future_articles_time_series.md‎

Lines changed: 0 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,10 +16,6 @@ tags: []
1616
Here are several article ideas that would complement the ARIMAX time series model article, expanding on related topics within time series analysis, forecasting, and statistical modeling:
1717

1818

19-
<!-- TODO: 2. **"Time Series Forecasting with SARIMA: Seasonal ARIMA Explained"**
20-
- Introduce SARIMA (Seasonal ARIMA) and its relevance to time series with strong seasonal patterns.
21-
- Explain how SARIMA extends ARIMA by modeling seasonality, including parameter selection and interpretation.
22-
- Provide real-world examples and R or Python code for implementation. -->
2319

2420

2521

‎_posts/2024-09-12-confusion_matrix_classification_metrics_complete_guide.md‎

Lines changed: 353 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
1+
---
2+
author_profile: false
3+
categories:
4+
- machine-learning
5+
- model-evaluation
6+
classes: wide
7+
date: '2024-09-12'
8+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
9+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
10+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
11+
header:
12+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
13+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
14+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
15+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
16+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
17+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
18+
keywords:
19+
- Confusion matrix
20+
- Precision vs recall
21+
- Classification metrics
22+
- Model evaluation
23+
- Threshold tuning
24+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
25+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
26+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
27+
seo_type: article
28+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
29+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
30+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
31+
real-world case studies.
32+
tags:
33+
- Confusion-matrix
34+
- Precision
35+
- Recall
36+
- F1-score
37+
- Model-performance
38+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
39+
---
40+
41+
In machine learning, assessing a classification model is as important as building it. A classic way to visualize and quantify a classifier’s performance is through the **confusion matrix**. It shows exactly where the model succeeds and where it fails.
42+
43+
This article explores in detail what a confusion matrix is, how to derive key metrics from it, and in which real-world scenarios you should prioritize one metric over another. By the end, you will see practical examples, threshold-tuning tips, and guidelines for choosing the right metric based on the cost of each type of error.
44+
45+
---
46+
author_profile: false
47+
categories:
48+
- machine-learning
49+
- model-evaluation
50+
classes: wide
51+
date: '2024-09-12'
52+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
53+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
54+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
55+
header:
56+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
57+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
58+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
59+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
60+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
61+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
62+
keywords:
63+
- Confusion matrix
64+
- Precision vs recall
65+
- Classification metrics
66+
- Model evaluation
67+
- Threshold tuning
68+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
69+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
70+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
71+
seo_type: article
72+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
73+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
74+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
75+
real-world case studies.
76+
tags:
77+
- Confusion-matrix
78+
- Precision
79+
- Recall
80+
- F1-score
81+
- Model-performance
82+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
83+
---
84+
85+
## 2. Key Metrics Derived from the Confusion Matrix
86+
87+
The values TP, FP, FN, and TN form the basis for various evaluation metrics:
88+
89+
**Accuracy** measures the proportion of total correct predictions:
90+
$$
91+
\text{Accuracy} = \frac{TP + TN}{TP + TN + FP + FN}
92+
$$
93+
94+
**Precision**, or Positive Predictive Value, measures the correctness of positive predictions:
95+
$$
96+
\text{Precision} = \frac{TP}{TP + FP}
97+
$$
98+
99+
**Recall**, also known as Sensitivity or True Positive Rate, measures the model's ability to capture positive cases:
100+
$$
101+
\text{Recall} = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}
102+
$$
103+
104+
**Specificity**, or True Negative Rate, indicates how well the model detects negatives:
105+
$$
106+
\text{Specificity} = \frac{TN}{TN + FP}
107+
$$
108+
109+
**F1-Score** balances precision and recall:
110+
$$
111+
F1 = 2 \times \frac{\text{Precision} \times \text{Recall}}{\text{Precision} + \text{Recall}}
112+
$$
113+
114+
Other related rates include the **False Positive Rate (FPR)**, calculated as $1 - \text{Specificity}$, and **False Negative Rate (FNR)**, calculated as $1 - \text{Recall}$.
115+
116+
---
117+
author_profile: false
118+
categories:
119+
- machine-learning
120+
- model-evaluation
121+
classes: wide
122+
date: '2024-09-12'
123+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
124+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
125+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
126+
header:
127+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
128+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
129+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
130+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
131+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
132+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
133+
keywords:
134+
- Confusion matrix
135+
- Precision vs recall
136+
- Classification metrics
137+
- Model evaluation
138+
- Threshold tuning
139+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
140+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
141+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
142+
seo_type: article
143+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
144+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
145+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
146+
real-world case studies.
147+
tags:
148+
- Confusion-matrix
149+
- Precision
150+
- Recall
151+
- F1-score
152+
- Model-performance
153+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
154+
---
155+
156+
## 4. When to Optimize Each Metric
157+
158+
Each metric serves a different purpose depending on the real-world costs of misclassification. Let’s explore when you should prioritize each.
159+
160+
### 4.1 Optimizing Recall (Minimize FN)
161+
162+
In high-stakes applications like medical screening, missing a positive case (false negative) can be disastrous. Prioritizing recall ensures fewer missed cases, even if it means more false alarms. Lowering the classification threshold typically boosts recall.
163+
164+
### 4.2 Optimizing Precision (Minimize FP)
165+
166+
When false positives lead to significant costs—such as in fraud detection—precision takes priority. High precision ensures that when the model flags an instance, it's usually correct. This is achieved by raising the threshold and being more conservative in positive predictions.
167+
168+
### 4.3 Optimizing Specificity (Minimize FP among Negatives)
169+
170+
Specificity becomes critical in scenarios like airport security, where a high number of false positives among the majority class (non-threats) can cause operational bottlenecks. A high specificity model ensures minimal disruption.
171+
172+
### 4.4 Optimizing Accuracy
173+
174+
Accuracy is suitable when classes are balanced and the cost of errors is symmetric. In such cases, optimizing for overall correctness makes sense. A default threshold (typically 0.5) often suffices.
175+
176+
### 4.5 Optimizing F1-Score (Balance Precision & Recall)
177+
178+
In imbalanced datasets like spam detection or rare event classification, neither precision nor recall alone is sufficient. F1-score provides a harmonic mean, offering a balanced measure especially when both false positives and false negatives are undesirable.
179+
180+
---
181+
author_profile: false
182+
categories:
183+
- machine-learning
184+
- model-evaluation
185+
classes: wide
186+
date: '2024-09-12'
187+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
188+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
189+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
190+
header:
191+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
192+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
193+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
194+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
195+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
196+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
197+
keywords:
198+
- Confusion matrix
199+
- Precision vs recall
200+
- Classification metrics
201+
- Model evaluation
202+
- Threshold tuning
203+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
204+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
205+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
206+
seo_type: article
207+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
208+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
209+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
210+
real-world case studies.
211+
tags:
212+
- Confusion-matrix
213+
- Precision
214+
- Recall
215+
- F1-score
216+
- Model-performance
217+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
218+
---
219+
220+
## 6. Threshold Tuning and Performance Curves
221+
222+
Most classifiers output probabilities rather than hard labels. A **decision threshold** converts these into binary predictions. Adjusting this threshold shifts the trade-off between TP, FP, FN, and TN.
223+
224+
### 6.1 ROC Curve
225+
226+
The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve plots the **True Positive Rate (Recall)** against the **False Positive Rate (1 - Specificity)** across different thresholds.
227+
228+
- AUC (Area Under Curve) quantifies the model’s ability to discriminate between classes. A perfect model has AUC = 1.0.
229+
230+
### 6.2 Precision–Recall Curve
231+
232+
The PR curve is more informative for imbalanced datasets. It plots **Precision** vs. **Recall**, highlighting the trade-off between capturing positives and avoiding false alarms.
233+
234+
### 6.3 Practical Steps
235+
236+
To fine-tune thresholds:
237+
238+
1. Generate probability scores on a validation set.
239+
2. Compute metrics (precision, recall, F1) at various thresholds.
240+
3. Plot ROC and PR curves.
241+
4. Choose the threshold that aligns with business goals.
242+
243+
---
244+
author_profile: false
245+
categories:
246+
- machine-learning
247+
- model-evaluation
248+
classes: wide
249+
date: '2024-09-12'
250+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
251+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
252+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
253+
header:
254+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
255+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
256+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
257+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
258+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
259+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
260+
keywords:
261+
- Confusion matrix
262+
- Precision vs recall
263+
- Classification metrics
264+
- Model evaluation
265+
- Threshold tuning
266+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
267+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
268+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
269+
seo_type: article
270+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
271+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
272+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
273+
real-world case studies.
274+
tags:
275+
- Confusion-matrix
276+
- Precision
277+
- Recall
278+
- F1-score
279+
- Model-performance
280+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
281+
---
282+
283+
## 8. Best Practices
284+
285+
To ensure meaningful evaluation:
286+
287+
- Always visualize the confusion matrix—it reveals misclassification patterns.
288+
- Frame metrics in terms of business impact: what does a false negative or false positive cost?
289+
- Use cross-validation to avoid overfitting to a specific validation set.
290+
- Report multiple metrics, not just accuracy.
291+
- Communicate model performance clearly, especially to non-technical stakeholders.
292+
293+
---
294+
author_profile: false
295+
categories:
296+
- machine-learning
297+
- model-evaluation
298+
classes: wide
299+
date: '2024-09-12'
300+
excerpt: A detailed guide on the confusion matrix and performance metrics in machine
301+
learning. Learn when to use accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and how to fine-tune
302+
classification thresholds for real-world impact.
303+
header:
304+
image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
305+
og_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
306+
overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
307+
show_overlay_excerpt: false
308+
teaser: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
309+
twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_9.jpg
310+
keywords:
311+
- Confusion matrix
312+
- Precision vs recall
313+
- Classification metrics
314+
- Model evaluation
315+
- Threshold tuning
316+
seo_description: Understand the confusion matrix, key classification metrics like
317+
precision and recall, and when to use each based on real-world cost trade-offs.
318+
seo_title: 'Confusion Matrix Explained: Metrics, Use Cases, and Trade-Offs'
319+
seo_type: article
320+
summary: This guide explores the confusion matrix, explains how to calculate accuracy,
321+
precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, and discusses when to optimize each
322+
metric based on the application context. Includes threshold tuning techniques and
323+
real-world case studies.
324+
tags:
325+
- Confusion-matrix
326+
- Precision
327+
- Recall
328+
- F1-score
329+
- Model-performance
330+
title: 'Confusion Matrix and Classification Metrics: A Complete Guide'
331+
---
332+
333+
## 10. Summary of Trade-Offs
334+
335+
| Metric | Optimise When | Trade-Off Accepted |
336+
|--------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
337+
| **Recall** | Missing positives is very costly | More false positives |
338+
| **Precision**| False alarms are costly | More missed positives |
339+
| **Specificity**| False alarms among negatives unacceptable | Some positives may slip through|
340+
| **Accuracy** | Balanced classes, symmetric costs | Hides imbalance effects |
341+
| **F1-Score** | Need balance on imbalanced data | Accepts both FP and FN |
342+
343+
---
344+
345+
The confusion matrix is fundamental for diagnosing classification models. Each derived metric—accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-score—serves a purpose. Choose based on real-world cost of errors:
346+
347+
- In medicine, prioritize recall to avoid missed diagnoses.
348+
- For fraud detection, precision minimizes unnecessary investigations.
349+
- In security, a multi-threshold approach balances sensitivity and disruption.
350+
- For balanced datasets, accuracy may suffice.
351+
- For imbalanced tasks, use F1-score and PR curves.
352+
353+
Always validate thresholds on independent data, relate metrics to business impact, and visualize results to support decisions. With these strategies, your model evaluations will be aligned with real-world needs and deliver actionable insights.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)