Skip to content

refactor: rewrite http ratelimiting to be dynamic #947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EmmmaTech
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR rewrites http ratelimiting to be more dynamic.
Closes #663.

I'm not sure whether to declare this PR as feature or breaking for the changelog entry, so please let me know which one it should be.

Checklist

  • If code changes were made, then they have been tested
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes
    • I have formatted the code properly by running task lint
    • I have type-checked the code by running task pyright
  • This PR fixes an issue
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters)
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed)
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, ...)

@shiftinv shiftinv added s: needs review Issue/PR is awaiting reviews t: refactor/typing/lint Refactors, typing changes and/or linting changes labels Feb 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Skelmis Skelmis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a possible race condition here given the original lock and then the one used in subsequent requests are going to be seperate Lock objects? Just given if there is a bucket from within the request it will generate a new lock object and use that for subsequent requests from what I can see

@EmmmaTech
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there a possible race condition here given the original lock and then the one used in subsequent requests are going to be seperate Lock objects? Just given if there is a bucket from within the request it will generate a new lock object and use that for subsequent requests from what I can see

That could be a possibility, yeah.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
s: needs review Issue/PR is awaiting reviews t: refactor/typing/lint Refactors, typing changes and/or linting changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rewrite ratelimit handling to use X-Ratelimit-Bucket
3 participants