I've been using Fastchess to run some gauntlet matches. Here are some results from Fastchess where Juggernaut 1.55 is playing a range of opponents.
--------------------------------------------------
Rank Name Elo +/- nElo +/- Games Score Draw Ptnml(0-2)
1 Juggernaut 1.55 101.21 42.63 128.22 50.76 180 64.2% 40.0% [5, 5, 36, 22, 22]
2 CT800 v1.46 53.88 134.87 57.12 133.55 26 57.7% 30.8% [1, 3, 4, 1, 4]
3 Fox Chess 1.0 -81.65 75.76 -152.04 133.55 26 38.5% 69.2% [2, 2, 9, 0, 0]
4 Chal 1.4.0 -95.90 115.14 -122.22 133.55 26 36.5% 46.2% [3, 3, 6, 0, 1]
5 Fatalii 0.10.0 -95.90 115.14 -122.22 133.55 26 36.5% 46.2% [4, 1, 6, 2, 0]
6 Juggernaut 1.40 -136.97 110.86 -199.37 139.00 24 31.2% 33.3% [3, 4, 4, 1, 0]
7 Reyna 1.0 -190.85 103.99 -313.17 133.55 26 25.0% 30.8% [4, 5, 4, 0, 0]
8 Juggernaut 1.38 -190.85 131.22 -255.71 133.55 26 25.0% 23.1% [5, 4, 3, 1, 0]
--------------------------------------------------
The Elo is being reported based on the Score %. This is quite misleading. For example, someone could naively think Juggernaut 1.55 is 291 Elo better than v1.38. Can I suggest that the Elo for a gauntlet match are always relative to the engine playing all games (in this case Juggernaut 1.38)?
I've been using Fastchess to run some gauntlet matches. Here are some results from Fastchess where Juggernaut 1.55 is playing a range of opponents.
The Elo is being reported based on the Score %. This is quite misleading. For example, someone could naively think Juggernaut 1.55 is 291 Elo better than v1.38. Can I suggest that the Elo for a gauntlet match are always relative to the engine playing all games (in this case Juggernaut 1.38)?
— Steve