|
| 1 | +<!doctype html> |
| 2 | +<html lang="en"> |
| 3 | +<head> |
| 4 | + <meta charset="utf-8"> |
| 5 | + <title>Implementation Plan: Issue #149 Focused Test Coverage Roadmap</title> |
| 6 | + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> |
| 7 | + <style> |
| 8 | + body { margin: 0; font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", sans-serif; background: #f6f7f9; color: #1f2937; line-height: 1.5; } |
| 9 | + main { max-width: 1100px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 32px; } |
| 10 | + section { background: #fff; border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px; padding: 20px; margin: 16px 0; } |
| 11 | + h1, h2 { line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0; } |
| 12 | + code { background: #f3f4f6; padding: 2px 5px; border-radius: 4px; } |
| 13 | + .badge { display: inline-block; padding: 4px 10px; border-radius: 999px; background: #dcfce7; color: #166534; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 700; } |
| 14 | + .risk { border-left: 4px solid #dc2626; } |
| 15 | + .approval { border-left: 4px solid #d97706; } |
| 16 | + </style> |
| 17 | +</head> |
| 18 | +<body> |
| 19 | +<main> |
| 20 | + <h1>Implementation Plan: Issue #149 Focused Test Coverage Roadmap</h1> |
| 21 | + <p class="badge">Approved and implemented</p> |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + <section> |
| 24 | + <h2>Task Summary</h2> |
| 25 | + <p>Create a current, focused test coverage roadmap for active Health Dashboard behavior. This should update the issue/doc roadmap and add only high-value missing tests, not introduce broad coverage thresholds or slow infrastructure.</p> |
| 26 | + </section> |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + <section> |
| 29 | + <h2>Current Behavior</h2> |
| 30 | + <ul> |
| 31 | + <li>The repository currently has 78 Go test files under <code>internal</code> and related packages.</li> |
| 32 | + <li>Existing tests already cover major active areas: health formulas, readiness evidence, EnergyBank v2, stress validation, Apple Health XML parser fixtures, UI admin contracts, tenant scope, webhook dispatch, and storage writers.</li> |
| 33 | + <li><code>internal/applehealth/testdata</code> already has synthetic, malformed, and empty XML fixtures.</li> |
| 34 | + <li><code>CONTRIBUTING.md</code> states DB-backed tests skip when no Postgres connection is configured and warns against real personal health data in fixtures.</li> |
| 35 | + <li>CI currently runs the full pure test suite under <code>go test ./...</code>.</li> |
| 36 | + </ul> |
| 37 | + </section> |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + <section> |
| 40 | + <h2>Desired Behavior</h2> |
| 41 | + <ul> |
| 42 | + <li>The repo has a short, current roadmap that identifies remaining high-value test gaps instead of implying the test suite is empty.</li> |
| 43 | + <li>New tests target product contracts that change often: readiness freshness, EnergyBank v1/v2 compatibility boundaries, import conflict resolution, and API response stability.</li> |
| 44 | + <li>All tests added in this lane run under the existing default <code>go test ./...</code> path unless explicitly DB-gated and justified.</li> |
| 45 | + <li>No real personal health data is committed.</li> |
| 46 | + </ul> |
| 47 | + </section> |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + <section> |
| 50 | + <h2>Assumptions And Unknowns</h2> |
| 51 | + <ul> |
| 52 | + <li>Assumption: this issue is best handled as a roadmap plus a small first batch of tests, not a large test sweep.</li> |
| 53 | + <li>Assumption: issue #166 should own readiness freshness contract tests if implemented first.</li> |
| 54 | + <li>Unknown: whether the user wants child GitHub issues created for each coverage lane or a single living doc section.</li> |
| 55 | + <li>Unknown: whether coverage measurement should be introduced now; the issue says threshold should wait until there is a meaningful baseline.</li> |
| 56 | + </ul> |
| 57 | + </section> |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + <section> |
| 60 | + <h2>Files Likely To Change</h2> |
| 61 | + <ul> |
| 62 | + <li><code>docs/ARCHITECTURE.md</code>, <code>README.md</code>, or <code>CONTRIBUTING.md</code> - add the current test coverage roadmap.</li> |
| 63 | + <li><code>internal/health/*_test.go</code> - add focused invariant tests only where gaps remain.</li> |
| 64 | + <li><code>internal/applehealth/testdata/*</code> and <code>internal/applehealth/parse_test.go</code> - add a small anonymized fixture only if current fixtures do not cover a real parser risk.</li> |
| 65 | + <li><code>internal/ui/*_test.go</code> - add API response contract tests if readiness/AI/dashboard shapes are changed.</li> |
| 66 | + <li>GitHub issue comments or child issues - optional, if the roadmap should live in GitHub rather than docs.</li> |
| 67 | + </ul> |
| 68 | + </section> |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + <section> |
| 71 | + <h2>Implementation Steps</h2> |
| 72 | + <ol> |
| 73 | + <li>Produce a compact test inventory grouped by package and behavior.</li> |
| 74 | + <li>Map the issue's candidate lanes to current coverage and mark each as covered, partial, or missing.</li> |
| 75 | + <li>Choose a first small batch of tests that protects active product behavior without DB/network requirements.</li> |
| 76 | + <li>Add or update docs with the roadmap and "do not commit personal health data" fixture rule.</li> |
| 77 | + <li>If GitHub child issues are desired, create them after user approval with clear scopes and dependencies.</li> |
| 78 | + <li>Run the default test suite and vet.</li> |
| 79 | + </ol> |
| 80 | + </section> |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + <section> |
| 83 | + <h2>Impact</h2> |
| 84 | + <ul> |
| 85 | + <li><strong>CI:</strong> should remain fast; no coverage threshold or race job in this issue.</li> |
| 86 | + <li><strong>Data:</strong> no production DB changes; fixtures must stay synthetic/anonymized.</li> |
| 87 | + <li><strong>Product behavior:</strong> tests should pin existing behavior unless paired with an approved product change.</li> |
| 88 | + <li><strong>GitHub process:</strong> optional child issues can make the roadmap easier to execute incrementally.</li> |
| 89 | + </ul> |
| 90 | + </section> |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + <section> |
| 93 | + <h2>Test Plan</h2> |
| 94 | + <ul> |
| 95 | + <li><code>go test ./internal/health ./internal/applehealth ./internal/ui ./internal/storage -count=1</code></li> |
| 96 | + <li><code>go test ./...</code></li> |
| 97 | + <li><code>go vet ./...</code></li> |
| 98 | + <li>If fixtures are added: manually inspect fixture content for personal data before commit.</li> |
| 99 | + </ul> |
| 100 | + </section> |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + <section class="risk"> |
| 103 | + <h2>Risks And Edge Cases</h2> |
| 104 | + <ul> |
| 105 | + <li>A generic coverage push can create brittle tests that slow useful development.</li> |
| 106 | + <li>DB-backed tests can become flaky if they assume a developer has a local database; keep them opt-in unless necessary.</li> |
| 107 | + <li>Fixtures can accidentally leak personal data; prefer minimal synthetic XML.</li> |
| 108 | + <li>This issue overlaps with #166 and #152; keep readiness contract tests and race policy in their respective issues where possible.</li> |
| 109 | + </ul> |
| 110 | + </section> |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + <section> |
| 113 | + <h2>Rollback Plan</h2> |
| 114 | + <p>Revert roadmap docs and any added tests. If child issues are created incorrectly, close or relabel them rather than deleting historical context.</p> |
| 115 | + </section> |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | + <section> |
| 118 | + <h2>Open Questions</h2> |
| 119 | + <ul> |
| 120 | + <li>Should the roadmap live in docs, GitHub child issues, or both?</li> |
| 121 | + <li>Which first coverage batch is most valuable after #166: import safety, EnergyBank compatibility, or dashboard API stability?</li> |
| 122 | + <li>Should coverage metrics be measured once as an informational baseline, without enforcing a threshold?</li> |
| 123 | + </ul> |
| 124 | + </section> |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + <section class="approval"> |
| 127 | + <h2>Approval Gate</h2> |
| 128 | + <p>Approved by the user on 2026-06-06 before production code changes.</p> |
| 129 | + </section> |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | + <section> |
| 132 | + <h2>Implementation Result</h2> |
| 133 | + <ul> |
| 134 | + <li>Added <code>docs/TEST_COVERAGE.md</code> as the living focused coverage roadmap.</li> |
| 135 | + <li>Linked the roadmap from <code>CONTRIBUTING.md</code>.</li> |
| 136 | + <li>Added a synthetic Apple Health edge fixture at <code>internal/applehealth/testdata/focused_edge_export.xml</code>.</li> |
| 137 | + <li>Added <code>TestParseXMLFocusedEdgeFixturePinsImportSafety</code> to pin percent normalization boundaries, duration-derived category metrics, stand-hour mapping, unknown quantity fallback, invalid duration rejection, and unsupported correlation skipping.</li> |
| 138 | + <li>No real personal health data was added.</li> |
| 139 | + </ul> |
| 140 | + </section> |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + <section> |
| 143 | + <h2>Verification Run</h2> |
| 144 | + <ul> |
| 145 | + <li><code>go test ./internal/health ./internal/applehealth ./internal/ui ./internal/storage -count=1</code></li> |
| 146 | + <li><code>go test ./...</code></li> |
| 147 | + <li><code>go vet ./...</code></li> |
| 148 | + <li><code>git diff --check</code></li> |
| 149 | + </ul> |
| 150 | + </section> |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + <section> |
| 153 | + <h2>Known Limitations And Follow-Up</h2> |
| 154 | + <ul> |
| 155 | + <li>This PR intentionally does not add a coverage threshold.</li> |
| 156 | + <li>DB-backed coverage remains opt-in unless a product bug requires a focused storage contract test.</li> |
| 157 | + <li>Candidate follow-ups are tracked in <code>docs/TEST_COVERAGE.md</code> rather than created as child issues in this first pass.</li> |
| 158 | + </ul> |
| 159 | + </section> |
| 160 | +</main> |
| 161 | +</body> |
| 162 | +</html> |
0 commit comments