Looking through changes in #66 has made it clear that setting off MPI jobs as separate processes in the testing means their tests do not get picked up by the coverage checking. Not sure how to proceed with this, but some means of accounting for the testing done there would be good - maybe check what, if anything MPI.jl does?
Looking through changes in #66 has made it clear that setting off MPI jobs as separate processes in the testing means their tests do not get picked up by the coverage checking. Not sure how to proceed with this, but some means of accounting for the testing done there would be good - maybe check what, if anything MPI.jl does?