Found while verifying unrelated branches during the tech-debt sweep — every branch I checked showed these, and none of them caused them.
homeboy-core — 1 deterministic failure
test http_api::http_api_test::artifact_content_serves_encoded_artifact_store_locator ... FAILED
Confirmed on origin/main at 0cad5a542 with a clean, isolated target dir. Fails identically on branches that do not touch http_api.rs.
homeboy-agents — 6 failures in cook::tests, and they are flaky
On origin/main:
cook_successful_concrete_attempt_publishes_reviewer_body
manual_preflight_intent_does_not_block_normal_cook_finalization
manual_preflight_recovers_without_a_persisted_promotion_and_rejects_tampering
recovered_cook_finalization_uses_latest_resumed_gate_contract
re_materialize_follow_up_baseline_recovers_after_worktree_deletion
replacement_gate_proof_recovers_failed_candidate_without_hiding_evidence_or_republishing
They are not stable. Consecutive runs of the same tree produced 9, then 5, then 6 failures, with overlapping but non-identical sets. The names point at worktree materialization, baseline re-materialization, and gate-proof recovery — all filesystem- and ordering-sensitive.
Why this matters more than the count
I only detected these by diffing failure lists between a branch and its merge base. A branch that genuinely broke one of these tests would be indistinguishable from the noise, and a reviewer seeing "6 failed" on their branch would reasonably assume it was theirs.
It also interacts badly with two things the sweep just landed:
- CI shards are
--changed-since-scoped, so a given shard may never run these.
#11835 bounded several poll loops with deadline-based tests. Flaky wall-clock tests in the same suite make it harder to tell a real timing regression from this background noise.
Suggested handling
- Fix or
#[ignore] the deterministic http_api failure — a permanently-red test teaches people to ignore red.
- Triage the
cook::tests six as a group. If they share a fixture-isolation root cause (likely, given the names), one fix probably covers them.
- Until then, consider a documented known-failing list so a branch author can diff against it, which is what I had to reconstruct by hand.
Found while verifying unrelated branches during the tech-debt sweep — every branch I checked showed these, and none of them caused them.
homeboy-core— 1 deterministic failureConfirmed on
origin/mainat0cad5a542with a clean, isolated target dir. Fails identically on branches that do not touchhttp_api.rs.homeboy-agents— 6 failures incook::tests, and they are flakyOn
origin/main:They are not stable. Consecutive runs of the same tree produced 9, then 5, then 6 failures, with overlapping but non-identical sets. The names point at worktree materialization, baseline re-materialization, and gate-proof recovery — all filesystem- and ordering-sensitive.
Why this matters more than the count
I only detected these by diffing failure lists between a branch and its merge base. A branch that genuinely broke one of these tests would be indistinguishable from the noise, and a reviewer seeing "6 failed" on their branch would reasonably assume it was theirs.
It also interacts badly with two things the sweep just landed:
--changed-since-scoped, so a given shard may never run these.#11835bounded several poll loops with deadline-based tests. Flaky wall-clock tests in the same suite make it harder to tell a real timing regression from this background noise.Suggested handling
#[ignore]the deterministichttp_apifailure — a permanently-red test teaches people to ignore red.cook::testssix as a group. If they share a fixture-isolation root cause (likely, given the names), one fix probably covers them.