Fix issue 583. #1219
Annotations
10 warnings
|
ci:
Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L293
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(293,14-293,16):
- In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to
prove that the types of
q1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(293,14-293,16))
and t1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(173,20-173,22))
are equal.
- The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.qualifier
- The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.st_term
- If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
|
|
ci:
Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L123
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22):
- In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to
prove that the types of
p1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22))
and pb1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19))
are equal.
- The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern
- The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern & Prims.bool
- If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
|
|
ci:
Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L139
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19):
- In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to
prove that the types of
pb1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19))
and p1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22))
are equal.
- The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern & Prims.bool
- The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern
- If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
|
|
ci:
Pulse.Lib.Raise.fst#L21
(318) * Warning 318 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/lib/common/Pulse.Lib.Raise.fst(21,4-21,12):
- Values of type `raisable` will be erased during extraction, but its
interface hides this fact.
- Add the `must_erase_for_extraction` attribute to the `val raisable`
declaration for this symbol in the interface
|
|
ci:
PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.fst#L943
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.fst(943,4-943,16):
- Global binding
'PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.desugar_decl'
is recursive but not used in its body
|
|
ci:
Pulse.Common.fst#L84
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Common.fst(84,11-84,12):
- The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though
FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop
relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
|
|
ci:
PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L659
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(659,47-659,48):
- The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though
FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop
relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
|
|
ci:
PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L658
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(658,47-658,48):
- The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though
FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop
relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
|
|
ci:
PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L542
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(542,8-542,17):
- Global binding
'PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.scan_decl'
is recursive but not used in its body
|
|
ci:
PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L394
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(394,8-394,15):
- Global binding
'PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.eq_decl'
is recursive but not used in its body
|