Open
Description
This started out for me as a hassle in a peer review process, but I am increasingly starting to admire ASHRAE's Commercialism Policy. For example, have a look at their presentation template.
As per policy, they expect that:
- Any reference to an initiative or software is for clarity.
- Software name is mentioned only once in the beginning, and afterwards referred to generically (Software 1, Software 2)
- Equipment branding is removed from the photos
- It is not suggested that ASHRAE Approves the product in any way
- Potential bias is listed
- Presenter's logo is only on the first slide
Specially the second item sounds awkward but interesting.
They can be so strict with all of it because they are big. But the underlying idea is: a tool is a tool and nothing more, it can be substituted for something else, let's talk about what was achieved. I think we should be using the same principle to the extent that it doesn't disincentivize presentation.
What would you think about having a commercialism note for presenters?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels