Skip to content

Commercialism Policy #5

Open
Open
@please-wait

Description

@please-wait

This started out for me as a hassle in a peer review process, but I am increasingly starting to admire ASHRAE's Commercialism Policy. For example, have a look at their presentation template.

As per policy, they expect that:

  • Any reference to an initiative or software is for clarity.
  • Software name is mentioned only once in the beginning, and afterwards referred to generically (Software 1, Software 2)
  • Equipment branding is removed from the photos
  • It is not suggested that ASHRAE Approves the product in any way
  • Potential bias is listed
  • Presenter's logo is only on the first slide

Specially the second item sounds awkward but interesting.

They can be so strict with all of it because they are big. But the underlying idea is: a tool is a tool and nothing more, it can be substituted for something else, let's talk about what was achieved. I think we should be using the same principle to the extent that it doesn't disincentivize presentation.

What would you think about having a commercialism note for presenters?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions