diff --git a/dev/terria/terria-cube-v8.json b/dev/terria/terria-cube-v8.json
index c5f199842..c826302ae 100644
--- a/dev/terria/terria-cube-v8.json
+++ b/dev/terria/terria-cube-v8.json
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@
}
},
"featureInfoTemplate": {
- "template": "Digital Earth Australia Intertidal
This location had an elevation above modelled Mean Sea Level (MSL):
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.elevation}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres (± {{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.elevation_uncertainty}}{{/terria.formatNumber}})
It was exposed from tidal inundation for:
{{data.0.bands.exposure}}% of the {{#terria.formatDateTime}}{format: \"yyyy\"}{{data.0.time}}{{/terria.formatDateTime}} analysis period
Mapped intertidal extents can be affected by biases in the tidal conditions observed by satellites
. At this location, satellites observed the coastline at tide heights ranging from
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_lot}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} to
+{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_hot}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres above MSL, compared to the full astronomical tide range of
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_lat}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} to
+{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_hat}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres above MSL.
This resulted in satellite data observing
~{{data.0.bands.ta_spread}}% of the astronomical tide range, and failing to observe the lowest
~{{data.0.bands.ta_offset_low}}% and highest
~{{data.0.bands.ta_offset_high}}% of tides.
For more information about intertidal mapping accuracy and limitations and data access options, visit the DEA Intertidal product description.Digital Earth Australia Intertidal
This location had an elevation above modelled Mean Sea Level (MSL):
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.elevation}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres (± {{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.elevation_uncertainty}}{{/terria.formatNumber}})
It was exposed from tidal inundation for:
{{data.0.bands.exposure}}% of the {{#terria.formatDateTime}}{format: \"yyyy\"}{{data.0.time}}{{/terria.formatDateTime}} analysis period
Mapped intertidal extents can be affected by biases in the tidal conditions observed by satellites
. At this location, satellites observed the coastline at tide heights ranging from
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_lot}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} to
+{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_hot}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres above MSL, compared to the full astronomical tide range of
{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_lat}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} to
+{{#terria.formatNumber}}{maximumFractionDigits:2}{{data.0.bands.ta_hat}}{{/terria.formatNumber}} metres above MSL.
This resulted in satellite data observing
~{{data.0.bands.ta_spread}}% of the astronomical tide range, and failing to observe the lowest
~{{data.0.bands.ta_offset_low}}% and highest
~{{data.0.bands.ta_offset_high}}% of tides.
For more information about intertidal mapping accuracy and limitations and data access options, visit the DEA Intertidal product description.