Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
64 lines (45 loc) · 3.86 KB

findings.md

File metadata and controls

64 lines (45 loc) · 3.86 KB

Acton Reactive Mono-repo Structure Review

This document summarizes the findings of a review of the Acton Reactive mono-repo structure and crate interdependencies.

Overall Structure

The project is organized as a standard Rust Cargo workspace, defined in the root Cargo.toml. This is a recommended best practice for managing multiple related crates.

The workspace members are:

  • acton-core
  • acton-macro
  • acton-reactive
  • acton_test

Crate Dependencies and Relationships

The dependencies between the workspace crates were analyzed by examining their respective Cargo.toml files:

  1. acton-core:

    • Appears to be the foundational library crate, containing core types and logic.
    • Does not depend on other main workspace crates (acton-macro, acton-reactive).
    • Uses acton_test as a development dependency.

  2. acton-macro:

    • A procedural macro crate (proc-macro = true).
    • Provides macros, likely used by acton-reactive.
    • Correctly isolated with no dependencies on other workspace crates.

  3. acton-reactive:

    • Appears to be the main library or application crate, integrating functionality from other crates.
    • Depends on acton-core for core logic.
    • Depends on acton-macro for procedural macros.
    • Uses acton_test as a development dependency.

  4. acton_test:

    • Provides testing utilities for the Acton framework.
    • Contains a nested procedural macro crate, acton_test_macro, located at ./acton_test_macro.
    • Depends on acton_test_macro.
    • Used as a development dependency by acton-core and acton-reactive.

  5. acton_test_macro:

    • A nested procedural macro crate within acton_test.
    • Provides macros specifically for the testing utilities in acton_test.
    • Correctly isolated with no dependencies on other workspace crates.

Dependency Specification

  • All dependencies between crates within the workspace are correctly specified using relative path entries (e.g., acton-core = { path = "../acton-core" }). This ensures that the local versions of the crates are used during builds and tests within the workspace.

Best Practices Assessment

  • Workspace Usage: The use of a Cargo workspace is appropriate and follows standard Rust practices for multi-crate projects.
  • Modularity: The separation into core, macro, reactive, and test crates suggests good modularity and separation of concerns.
  • Dependency Management: Path dependencies are used correctly for intra-workspace linking. The dependency graph is acyclic.
  • Proc-Macros: Procedural macro crates (acton-macro, acton_test_macro) are correctly defined and structured, including the nested macro pattern in acton_test.

Minor Observations and Suggestions

  • Redundant Version in Path Dependency: In acton_test/Cargo.toml, the dependency acton_test_macro = { path = "./acton_test_macro", version = "1.0.0" } includes a version field. Cargo ignores this field for path dependencies, so it could be omitted for clarity, although its presence is not harmful.
  • Blanket unused Lint Allowance: Both acton-core and acton-reactive have [lints.rust] unused = "allow" in their Cargo.toml. While potentially useful during rapid development, this can hide dead or unnecessary code. Consider removing this blanket allowance and using specific #[allow(unused)] attributes where needed, or addressing the unused code directly. This promotes better code hygiene, especially for library crates.

Conclusion

The mono-repo structure and the way crates reference each other generally follow Rust best practices. The workspace is well-defined, dependencies are correctly specified using paths, and the modular structure appears sound. The minor observations regarding lint allowances and redundant version specifiers are suggestions for potential refinement rather than significant issues.