Skip to content

POSITIONING.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
200 lines (139 loc) · 7.69 KB

POSITIONING.md

File metadata and controls

200 lines (139 loc) · 7.69 KB

Dedaliano Positioning

Read next:

What Dedaliano Is

Dedaliano is an open-source structural solver and an emerging structural engineering platform.

Today the strongest identity is:

  • browser-native structural modeling and analysis
  • open-source solver development
  • broad structural mechanics coverage
  • unusually deep benchmark and validation culture

The cleanest short description is:

Dedaliano is an open-source structural analysis and structural mechanics platform for structural engineering.

The stronger current claim is:

Dedaliano is becoming one of the strongest open structural solvers, with a broader product surface than most solver-first projects.

That claim is now supported by more than raw category count:

  • latest reported full-suite status of 5896 passing tests and 0 failures
  • explicit benchmark-gate suites for constraints, contact, shells, reduction, sparse / conditioning paths, and sparse 3D parity
  • solver-core work that now includes constraints, shells, contact, SSI, fiber nonlinear analysis, imperfections, creep / shrinkage, and reduction
  • an explicit multi-family shell story (MITC4, MITC9, SHB8-ANS, and curved shells) with research-driven selection guidance instead of opaque defaults

What It Is Not

Dedaliano is not:

  • a general-purpose multiphysics platform like Abaqus, ANSYS, or Code_Aster at large
  • a generic CAD/BIM replacement
  • a full construction-documentation system
  • a general CFD, thermal-fluid, or manufacturing simulation stack

The scope should stay structural first.

Current Product Surface

The current product surface is already broad enough to support a real company narrative:

  • browser-native structural modeling and visualization
  • a substantial Rust structural solver
  • meaningful structural design-check and postprocess modules
  • a large public benchmark and validation program

The detailed source of truth for what exists is:

Strategic Advantage

The strongest current differentiators are:

  • Open source The solver and validation story are inspectable and auditable.
  • Browser-native delivery No desktop installation, licensing friction, or heavyweight deployment model.
  • Validation moat The repo already has an unusually large public benchmark surface for this class of product.
  • Platform leverage The same solver can support the web app, APIs, future plugins, single-purpose tools, and design workflows.

The next differentiators are less about adding whole new solver categories and more about:

  • robustness on difficult real models
  • performance at scale
  • benchmark credibility on the newest solver families
  • shell and nonlinear workflow maturity
  • consistent solver-path behavior across constrained and unconstrained workflows
  • benchmark-gated release discipline on the newest solver families
  • scale-oriented workflow maturity such as reduction/substructuring and large-model solve discipline
  • productizing the full solver surface cleanly across app, API, and downstream tools

If the goal is to become the best open structural solver by far, the winning path is now clear:

  • dominate runtime and scale on real structural models
  • build the deepest visible proof moat in the category
  • make solver behavior deterministic and explainable
  • harden the ugly mixed nonlinear workflows competitors still win on
  • turn the multi-family shell stack into a coherent default workflow instead of a hidden expert feature

That credibility should be built visibly. The strongest long-term trust program is not one technique in isolation, but a stack:

  • public benchmark and cross-validation coverage
  • invariant and property-based testing
  • fuzzing for edge cases and regression discovery
  • selective proof-oriented rigor on small critical kernels

This document is about market framing, not the full solver inventory. Use BENCHMARKS.md for capability/proof and SOLVER_ROADMAP.md for execution order.

Best Competitive Wedge

Trying to be “the best solver overall” across all simulation categories is too broad.

The strongest winnable positions are:

  • best open-source structural solver
  • best browser-native structural solver
  • best validated structural solver for everyday structural engineering
  • best structural solver for building-frame and common office workflows

Near term, the most credible path is:

elite structural solver first, broader structural platform second

Those are credible paths. “Best solver in all engineering physics” is not the right target.

Product Categories Around the Solver

The solver can support several product layers:

  • structural analysis application
  • structural analysis API
  • code-check and design modules
  • connection and foundation tools
  • report and calculation automation
  • BIM / CAD integrations
  • optimization and AI-assisted engineering tools
  • education and benchmark-explorer products

The right expansion path is:

best structural solver -> best structural engineering platform

not:

best structural solver -> generic simulation company

Business Expansion Order

The best expansion order from the current base is:

  1. structural solver trust and solver-quality leadership
  2. code checks / design modules
  3. reports and documentation
  4. connections
  5. foundations
  6. interoperability and BIM-connected workflows
  7. optimization / AI-assisted workflows
  8. collaboration / firm workflow tooling

This order follows how structural firms buy software:

can it analyze -> can it design -> can it produce deliverables -> can it fit our workflow

Adjacent Markets That Fit

Good adjacent markets:

  • building structural engineering
  • bridge and staged-construction workflows
  • prestress / PT workflows
  • foundation and SSI-related workflows
  • structural education
  • engineering automation and report generation
  • structural optimization and design review
  • architect-friendly conceptual structural analysis as a later, guardrailed product layer

Bad adjacent markets for now:

  • CFD
  • broad thermal-fluid simulation
  • manufacturing solids
  • electromagnetics
  • general multiphysics expansion

The Role of the Solver

The solver is the core asset.

Business-wise, that means:

  • every new structural product can reuse the same mechanics core
  • benchmark credibility transfers across products
  • design, reporting, and workflow products become higher-margin layers on top of solver trust

This is why solver quality should stay the center of the company narrative.

Related Docs