Clarify FCCeeCLD detector model

[andresailer]

From the name of the model FCCee_o2_v02 I would assume that this is based on FCCee_o2_v01, which is the CLD detector model with the smaller 10 mm beampipe, and the corresponding smaller vertex detector
cf. https://github.com/iLCSoft/lcgeo/blob/4a5b6bb293ce5526ed23d14a3b5157a31326caf8/FCCee/compact/FCCee_o2_v01/FCCee_o2_v01.xml#L284

But looking at the vertex detector used in FCC_o2_v02 I see:

FCCDetectors/Detector/DetFCCeeCLD/compact/FCCee_o2_v02/Vertex.xml

Lines 45 to 47 in ce0513d

	<constant name="VertexBarrel_r1" value="1.75*cm"/>
	<constant name="VertexBarrel_r2" value="3.7*cm"/>
	<constant name="VertexBarrel_r3" value="5.7*cm"/>

Instead of
https://github.com/iLCSoft/lcgeo/blob/4a5b6bb293ce5526ed23d14a3b5157a31326caf8/FCCee/compact/FCCee_o2_v01/Vertex_o4_v05_smallBP.xml#L41-L43

	<constant name="VertexBarrel_r1" value="1.25*cm"/> 
        <constant name="VertexBarrel_r2" value="3.5*cm"/>
        <constant name="VertexBarrel_r3" value="5.7*cm"/>

[vvolkl]

@EmanuelPerez can you confirm? From what I remember:

The starting point was FCCee_o1_v04. The other files are obsolete or were used
for tests I think, except o2_v01, which has a smaller beam-pipe (backgrounds are still
to be studied in detail with this model, to check that such a small beam-pipe is acceptable
or not).

So this might be better off with the name FCCee_01_v05?

[EmanuelPerez]

On 10 Feb 2022, at 14:06, Valentin Volkl ***@***.******@***.***>> wrote: @EmanuelPerez<https://github.com/EmanuelPerez> can you confirm? From what I remember: The starting point was FCCee_o1_v04. The other files are obsolete or were used for tests I think, except o2_v01, which has a smaller beam-pipe (backgrounds are still to be studied in detail with this model, to check that such a small beam-pipe is acceptable or not). Yes. o1_v04 is the configuration with the R=15 mm beam-pipe, while o2 corresponds to the smaller beam-pipe. I do not remember a o2_v02. But obviously, it is indeed the wrong vertex file that has been put in this directory. The beam-pipe file may also be wrong, that needs to be checked. E. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#16 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABI7YBGTTAM52AQ4K57U6WDU2OZ5PANCNFSM5OAUDZOQ>. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>