Fix OpenRouter model ID mismatches for GPT-5 family #2619
Workflow file for this run
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| name: Claude Code Review | |
| on: | |
| pull_request: | |
| types: [opened, synchronize] | |
| # Optional: Only run on specific file changes | |
| # paths: | |
| # - "src/**/*.ts" | |
| # - "src/**/*.tsx" | |
| # - "src/**/*.js" | |
| # - "src/**/*.jsx" | |
| jobs: | |
| claude-review: | |
| # Optional: Filter by PR author | |
| # if: | | |
| # github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'external-contributor' || | |
| # github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'new-developer' || | |
| # github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: write # Required for inline comments | |
| issues: read | |
| id-token: write | |
| steps: | |
| - name: Checkout repository | |
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| with: | |
| fetch-depth: 1 | |
| - name: Run Claude Code Review | |
| id: claude-review | |
| uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta | |
| with: | |
| claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }} | |
| # Optional: Specify model (defaults to Claude Sonnet 4, uncomment for Claude Opus 4.1) | |
| # model: "claude-opus-4-1-20250805" | |
| # Direct prompt for automated review (no @claude mention needed) | |
| direct_prompt: | | |
| Review this PR and provide constructive feedback focusing on: | |
| - Critical bugs or security issues | |
| - Performance improvements and optimizations | |
| - Code quality and best practices | |
| - Potential refactoring opportunities | |
| - Breaking changes or API issues | |
| For each issue found, provide: | |
| 1. Clear explanation of the problem | |
| 2. Specific suggestions for improvement | |
| 3. Code examples when helpful | |
| Use inline comments for specific code suggestions and improvements. | |
| Provide actionable recommendations, not just issue identification. | |
| Provide a confidence score (0-10): | |
| - 0-3: Critical issues, do not merge | |
| - 4-7: Minor issues or improvements suggested, merge with consideration | |
| - 8-10: Good to merge, minor or no suggestions | |
| Summary format: | |
| **Score: X/10** - Brief reason | |
| **Suggestions Summary:** | |
| - List key improvement suggestions | |
| - Highlight any critical fixes needed | |
| # Enable sticky comments to update existing comments instead of creating new ones | |
| use_sticky_comment: true | |
| # Enable inline suggestions for specific code improvements | |
| review_mode: "inline" | |
| # Optional: Different prompts for different authors | |
| # direct_prompt: | | |
| # ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' && | |
| # 'Welcome! Please review this PR from a first-time contributor. Be encouraging and provide detailed explanations for any suggestions.' || | |
| # 'Please provide a thorough code review focusing on our coding standards and best practices.' }} | |
| # Optional: Add specific tools for running tests or linting | |
| allowed_tools: "Bash(yarn build),Bash(yarn test),Bash(yarn lint)" | |
| # Optional: Allow specific bots to trigger this workflow | |
| allowed_bots: "greptile-apps,replicas-connector,claude" | |
| # Optional: Skip review for certain conditions | |
| if: | | |
| !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[WIP]') |