Skip to content

adapter_name problem #15

Open
Open
@Harry-mic

Description

@Harry-mic

Hi! I encounter an issue that when doing the Step3(SFT).

The function "get_accelerate_model" in qlora_model.py sets the adapter_name="lora_default". This results in an error that the trainable parameters are set to 0.0 rather than 1.6% of the full parameters:

def get_accelerate_model(
    args: Namespace,
    checkpoint_dir: Optional[str] = None,
    adapter_name="lora_default",
    is_trainable=True,
    reuse_base_model=False,
):

I fix this by setting the adapter_name="default". I am finetuning a llama-2-7b-hf model and I wonder if it is a bug or an issue caused by the different finetuned model(7b and 70b)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions